To be perfectly frank, I got sick and tired of the car falling apart around me. Yes, when I was younger I did short OCI's (3000 miles) on my vehicles. All this ever did was cost me extra ownership money, to make the point of the original post... so yes. My cars would age and other things would begin to show wear (rattles, creaks, switches, accessories fail, suspension wears out, rust even etc.). In the end... I would have an old worn out car that was time to sell with a good motor / powertrain. Starting in 1996 with my new K1500 I went with the manufacturer's OCI (7500 miles)... guess what, same thing happened... great powertrain but the truck was worn out (AC issues, power steering leaks, radiator, alternator, front end, corrosion etc.). I have never had a oil related failure, sludged motor, lifter gummed up etc. on anything I have ever owned... 3k OCI or manufacturer OCI. However, for many, this 3k OCI (or any shorter than recommended OCI) is as powerful as their religious and / or cultural and / or social beliefs so I respect one's choice in that matter but short OCI's are simply not for me. I will short change my OCI under some circumstances only i.e. sustained operation in a dust storm, overheating, contamination from failed head / intake gasket etc. but otherwise the manufacturer's recommendation is fine for me. I love the GM OLM feature my last 2 GM's have had. Seeing the numerous UOA's here on BITOG done with oils and engines similar to what I use has also validated my decision on this matter for me as well.
Today (2013) my driving has changed and I exceed the "time in crankcase" number well before the mileage comes up / OLM goes off, this is one I am stuggling with. In warranty I change based on time recommended from the manufacturer (typically 1 year) and out of warrranty I change roughly 2 years... hope that is ok, so far so good... I am willing to bet nothing bad will happen to my motors