CR Top 10 LEAST reliable cars

[rjundi]

My MDX used came with navigation which I can use driving into Canada for 100 miles over border. Interface is really old but it beats paying $2/mb roamin internationally on a smartphone.

Its interestingly about the comment of all those electronics. MY Acura MDX has over 80+ buttons to operate everything. I think close to 20 on steering wheel. The systems they developed do not require a touch interface but a large knob for navigation the rest each system is integrated with the next but do not have a single point of failure.

07-2013 MDX has wonderful reliability in electronics. Believe it or not its 2nd nature after a month of owning this vehicle where buttons are.

I have 120,000 miles and not a lick of trouble with electronics except when battery was weak fixed for $100 with battery replacement.

 

[AP9]

Originally Posted By: rjundi
My MDX used came with navigation which I can use driving into Canada for 100 miles over border. Interface is really old but it beats paying $2/mb roamin internationally on a smartphone.

Its interestingly about the comment of all those electronics. MY Acura MDX has over 80+ buttons to operate everything. I think close to 20 on steering wheel. The systems they developed do not require a touch interface but a large knob for navigation the rest each system is integrated with the next but do not have a single point of failure.

07-2013 MDX has wonderful reliability in electronics. Believe it or not its 2nd nature after a month of owning this vehicle where buttons are.

I have 120,000 miles and not a lick of trouble with electronics except when battery was weak fixed for $100 with battery replacement.

 

[grampi]

Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Everyone has their experiences and everyone's experiences are valid - that's what we base out perceptions on and unless someone is lying about their experiences (doubtful) then it counts. Arguing over someone's experiences is pointless.

However I think it's fair to say on the subject of Chrysler that historically they have built low quality cars. Had they not, they would not have gone bankrupt twice in their history. Once in the 80s when Iacocca was begging for loans and once again in 2008.


Chrysler was flush with cash until Daimler sucked them dry. I completely disagree that historically Chrysler has made bad vehicles. No worse than any other mfg. They have had their good and bad.


Then you sir are a Kool-Aid drinker...

 

[grampi]

Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Originally Posted By: whip
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Well, I was wrong. I am truly humbled. Apparently others anecdotal experiences are much more important than mine. Interesting point indeed.

Thanks for schooling me...


You're not wrong, just narrow minded....

Pot, meet the kettle.


I met him, and he apparently can't re-read his own posts or recall his past comments. Done doesn't even begin to describe my reaction, I am thoroughly embarrassed and have now figured out how to use the correct button to avoid future [censored]!

My thanks to the many who shared with me privately.

My apologies to all who got to watch...



...and apparently I just make up stuff about Chrysler products because they are perfect and the best built vehicles on the planet...