- Joined
- Jul 28, 2024
- Messages
- 1,475
Buy bothBoth are on sale right now. I did a search and found many different threads which seem to not come to any conclusions. So let me know your thoughts on which one you would choose.
Buy bothBoth are on sale right now. I did a search and found many different threads which seem to not come to any conclusions. So let me know your thoughts on which one you would choose.
I believe the OP was asking about technical merits of the two products.Vavoline is owned by Aramco. Aramco is mostly owned by the Saudi Royal family. It's pretty well established that the Saudi Royal family funded 9/11. I don't touch anything Valvoline.
I believe the OP was asking about technical merits of the two products.
The Valvoline quick lube spots are a separate company and American-owned. But as mentioned elsewhere, the Saudi owned (state controlled) Aramco bought the Valvoline lubricants company a while back.From Wikipedia:
“Valvoline Inc. is an American retail automotive services company based in Lexington, Kentucky.”
I looked at the thread...I don't get it. What does it show that keeps Valvoline on the avoid list? What was the experience you are referencing? It isn't EP either, his thread is about R&P.Four pages and no mention of Glenda's Valvoline EP experience. With so many other good options at the same (or lower price), I'd personally avoid.
I think what he is trying to say is that VRP is a great choice in your Subaru as @Glenda W. experience is that they become oil burners even with well regarded top tier off the shelf synthetics so she had to use VRP to fix that. With those results, why bother using something else for the same price?I looked at the thread...I don't get it. What does it show that keeps Valvoline on the avoid list? What was the experience you are referencing? It isn't EP either, his thread is about R&P.
She developed an oil burning engine even with 5k OCIs with Valvoline EP. If you look at her oil change history in the first post, she lists what oils she used, and despite using a "good oil" available OTS, she still developed an oil burning engine.I looked at the thread...I don't get it. What does it show that keeps Valvoline on the avoid list? What was the experience you are referencing? It isn't EP either, his thread is about R&P.
5K isn’t exactly a short interval when the OEM interval is 6 mo/6K on synthetic oil.She developed an oil burning engine even with 5k OCIs with Valvoline EP. If you look at her oil change history in the first post, she lists what oils she used, and despite using a "good oil" available OTS, she still developed an oil burning engine.
Even with short intervals, you are not guaranteed to leave no deposits or have less wear if the oil quality isn't sufficient.5K isn’t exactly a short interval when the OEM interval is 6 mo/6K on synthetic oil.
Plenty of people will make the argument that OEM interval is generally too long.
The oil will also have more deposit fighting capabilities at 3k than at 5K, so it could be a wash.Even with short intervals, you are not guaranteed to leave no deposits or have less wear if the oil quality isn't sufficient.
Edit to add: here's a good explanation as to why. The light ends evaporate and leave deposits.
And the Valvoline oil is still made in USA by Americans.The Valvoline quick lube spots are a separate company and American-owned. But as mentioned elsewhere, the Saudi owned (state controlled) Aramco bought the Valvoline lubricants company a while back.
Agree. And they have a big lab and other operations here as well, as featured in LSJ's videos. My reply was in response to someone mistaken that Valvoline (lubricants) is an American company.And the Valvoline oil is still made in USA by Americans.
However, I think the OP just wanted to know the technical merits of the oils he asked about.
Whose mistake is it again?Agree. And they have a big lab and other operations here as well, as featured in LSJ's videos. My reply was in response to someone mistaken that Valvoline (lubricants) is an American company.