World dominating? Please elaborate. I mean, I know people buy Highlander bcs. they just need reliable vehicle, and then start comparing it to X5, but “world dominating?” From company that couldn’t make diesel engine that doesn’t fall apart before 100k km? And then had to buy it from BMW?
Also, Mercedes has 4cyl with 222hp per liter.
I mean it is good car, but seriously…
Well I hope a car that retails for $13,000 extra such as the 240 outperforms the GR. If you scroll up I mentioned with ADMs there are better tools to be had then a GR/TypeR.It is not track ready car.
There has to be too many modifications to get them track ready. I see some, SOME in the sea of BMW’s on track. And those some are heavily modified with superchargers and accusumps so they don’t disintegrate engine during cornering.
Here in CO they tend to overheat super fast, and unlike BMW where you can easily “borrow “ oil coolers from bigger engines, in Toyota you can’t do that. You have to shell much more money.
It is not that M model is going to be faster on track, any 240 will.
Their torque in high revolutions is not bcs. rally cars have low torque. That is absolutely ridiculous statement. Their torque is not as good bcs. to achieve what BMW does, it takes more money, know how, complexity. That statement reminds me of ridiculous statements by some people how Toyota “helped” BMW with BMW engine, and it turned out BMW had Supra ready and no Toyota engineers touched it for six months.
And by the way, if Toyota had such know how, Supra wouldn’t be made in Austria.
Again, good cars, not worth that price.
BMW deserves every award there is for their I6, starting from the N54 and its B series successors. They have honed that motor to be a 0-60 king.
GR doesnt equate to GRMN, as i stated earlier, those are track ready with minimal prep required.
Lastly, where did you see a supercharged GR Corolla?