Carcarenut picks M1 over TGMO for GR Corolla

World dominating? Please elaborate. I mean, I know people buy Highlander bcs. they just need reliable vehicle, and then start comparing it to X5, but “world dominating?” From company that couldn’t make diesel engine that doesn’t fall apart before 100k km? And then had to buy it from BMW?
Also, Mercedes has 4cyl with 222hp per liter.
I mean it is good car, but seriously…
It is not track ready car.
There has to be too many modifications to get them track ready. I see some, SOME in the sea of BMW’s on track. And those some are heavily modified with superchargers and accusumps so they don’t disintegrate engine during cornering.
Here in CO they tend to overheat super fast, and unlike BMW where you can easily “borrow “ oil coolers from bigger engines, in Toyota you can’t do that. You have to shell much more money.
It is not that M model is going to be faster on track, any 240 will.

Their torque in high revolutions is not bcs. rally cars have low torque. That is absolutely ridiculous statement. Their torque is not as good bcs. to achieve what BMW does, it takes more money, know how, complexity. That statement reminds me of ridiculous statements by some people how Toyota “helped” BMW with BMW engine, and it turned out BMW had Supra ready and no Toyota engineers touched it for six months.
And by the way, if Toyota had such know how, Supra wouldn’t be made in Austria.

Again, good cars, not worth that price.
Well I hope a car that retails for $13,000 extra such as the 240 outperforms the GR. If you scroll up I mentioned with ADMs there are better tools to be had then a GR/TypeR.

BMW deserves every award there is for their I6, starting from the N54 and its B series successors. They have honed that motor to be a 0-60 king.

GR doesnt equate to GRMN, as i stated earlier, those are track ready with minimal prep required.

Lastly, where did you see a supercharged GR Corolla?
 
Nah, I still have Prado in Europe. But I really want to hear about this world domination. Or how they did not focus on appliance vehicles?
World domination? Oh yeah I forgot, we're playing RISK. If Toyota had more know how? You mean if BMW had more know how.They wish they had Toyota sales and reliability.
 
Last edited:
I mean, it's gonna get dominated by a 20 year old M car, the owner of which isn't going to give two hoots about how many HP/L it makes. 0-60 in north of 5 seconds and a high 13 at 101Mph in the 1/4 aren't exactly impressive 🤷‍♂️ I'm sure it handles well, but still, it's not going to be showing Mustangs, Camaros or many SUV's its tail lights light to light with Boy Racer behind the wheel.
Wait until the tuners crack the ECU and you have tunes for this thing (including E). Software should make these things hurt some feelings is my prediction.
 
Wait until the tuners crack the ECU and you have tunes for this thing (including E). Software should make these things hurt some feelings is my prediction.
Possibly, but it's already pretty high strung as it is at 187.5HP/L, this reminds me of some of the Civics I used to see at the track where they were putting a breaker bar on the head bolts between passes.
 
World domination? Oh yeah I forgot, we're playing RISK. If Toyota had more know how? You mean if BMW had more know how.They wish they had Toyota sales and reliability.
Not to be too cynical, but yeah, if BMW were to abandon everything that makes them BMW, they could become Toyota.
 
Possibly, but it's already pretty high strung as it is at 187.5HP/L, this reminds me of some of the Civics I used to see at the track where they were putting a breaker bar on the head bolts between passes.
It's a certainty. My 1.8 VW sits higher than that at close to 200hp/L with no drama...this thing has plenty of room for more power and with Toyota reliability, I'm sure it's been tuned quite conservatively. Those Civics were NA and convereted to forced induction, not the same thing/can't compare to a OE forced induction engine that gets more power extracted through software like we are talking about here. I personally think this thing is killer...too bad a performance car made of the average person has been destroyed by the dealers with silly markups and folks buying them and flipping them on sites like Cars and Bids....a shame....hope they all eat it on it. Have already read of one account of a flipper that lost a bunch of money which to that I said "serves him right".
 
It's a certainty. My 1.8 VW sits higher than that at close to 200hp/L with no drama...this thing has plenty of room for more power and with Toyota reliability, I'm sure it's been tuned quite conservatively. Those Civics were NA and convereted to forced induction, not the same thing/can't compare to a OE forced induction engine that gets more power extracted through software like we are talking about here. I personally think this thing is killer...too bad a performance car made of the average person has been destroyed by the dealers with silly markups and folks buying them and flipping them on sites like Cars and Bids....a shame....hope they all eat it on it. Have already read of one account of a flipper that lost a bunch of money which to that I said "serves him right".
Guess we'll see. There are no guarantees, Mitsubishi (walk crank, walk) and Scoobie Doo modified reliability come to mind, both factory forced induction. Just because it's Japanese with a factory hair drier doesn't make it a sure thing that it'll be bomb proof when taken well beyond the design basis.
 
Well I hope a car that retails for $13,000 extra such as the 240 outperforms the GR. If you scroll up I mentioned with ADMs there are better tools to be had then a GR/TypeR.

BMW deserves every award there is for their I6, starting from the N54 and its B series successors. They have honed that motor to be a 0-60 king.

GR doesnt equate to GRMN, as i stated earlier, those are track ready with minimal prep required.

Lastly, where did you see a supercharged GR Corolla?
I was generally talking about the Toyota lineup that is catered to more engaging customers.
I highly doubt I will ever see Corolla GR on the track.

What is minimum preparation? I have seen people on track with regular Chevrolet Impala coming to blow off some steam. That does not mean anything to come and do a few laps.

As for BMW I6, I would say, its history is lot longer than N54!

As for 240, I am not sure 230 won't outdo it on track too. BMW ALWAYS puts much more hp on wheels than other cars, bcs. they can make efficient drivetrain better than others. Plus, other NUMEROUS variables made Toyota buy cars from BMW, not another way around.
But, I am not sure BMW is a comparison, as I said, other cars in this category will be more appealing in the long run.
 
I was generally talking about the Toyota lineup that is catered to more engaging customers.
I highly doubt I will ever see Corolla GR on the track.

What is minimum preparation? I have seen people on track with regular Chevrolet Impala coming to blow off some steam. That does not mean anything to come and do a few laps.

As for BMW I6, I would say, history is bot longer than N54!
I will be curious this year if I see any down at VIR! I've seen a number of GR Supras and of course the 86.
 
Guess we'll see. There are no guarantees, Mitsubishi (walk crank, walk) and Scoobie Doo modified reliability come to mind, both factory forced induction. Just because it's Japanese with a factory hair drier doesn't make it a sure thing that it'll be bomb proof when taken well beyond the design basis.
I'd put my money on Toyota having no drama but like you said time will tell. Lancer EVOs can handle huge power out of that 2.0. Subis....yeah....need some engine bits to do it. The Germans....so many MK7 GTIs, Rs, and Golfs on the road with ~2x stock power happilly bee-boppin around without many issues to note. Software for MK8 is out and already software along is netting big power gains on the new GTI/R.
 
Oh I agree. And if that's your thing, I think a Tesla/Kia EV has that category locked down. Light to light destruction.
EV's are cleaning this category up if we are being honest, a good portion of them are nutty in the acceleration department. The BMW i4 M50 was tested at 0-60 in 3.3 seconds by Motortrend, the same group that couldn't get Toyota's claimed 0-60 of 4.99 seconds from the GR. It also ran a mid-11 at 121Mph.
This is more about on track performance. The GR corolla/Yaris are essentially rally ready. What does that mean?

The visceral experience, the way the vehicle feels on the track and how much control input will the vehicle allow to the driver is different then its competitors. The same with G16E-GTS; its a purpose built engine. It has very strong mid-range torque which is what's needed for rally cars. Its top end torque is actually very weak since rally cars have low top speeds. You see this in drag races where the GR has very fast 1/4 mi time but low trap speed.

While I understand this will probably not matter to most folks who just want to go fast, but if you really nerd out on the minute details and want a honed in product, Toyota is the brand.

That said, theres a lot of stuff in the pipeline, especially in the higher $ budgets.
Well this is kinda where I was going with the 20 year old M car comment. I see the potential for uptake in two camps here:
1. The Boy Racer camp I alluded to, which has previously been attracted to the WRX/STi and Lancer and indeed likes to blast light-to-light
2. The weekend racer camp where somebody legit wants a vehicle that can be tossed around the road course on the weekend, and then go to work on Monday and they may not have room for or can't afford to have a dedicated track vehicle.

An old bimmer is a pretty formidable opponent on the track if setup right and you don't have to worry about the car you are still making payments on. But, as I noted, that's obviously not an option for everybody and I'm sure this vehicle will be quite capable in that capacity and fun for the person who owns it.
 
Being a mechanic is different than being a chemist. No disrespect.
You don't have to know about oil, you have to know what the insides of an engine looks like as it ages and that tells all you need to know about oils.
 
Ridiculous. He's not using TGMO because the label omits "ILSAC GF-6A" but it does show API SP. Show me an SP oil not GF-6A nowadays that isn't "HighMileage". And if i recall correctly, many of those are GF6A too. Additionally, give me a reason why an SP rated oil would fail to properly lubricate when compared to one with both certs. "SpecParanoia"
??? He's following the owner's manual specifically.

1675115857228.png


1675117107053.webp


You seen the European & Imports oil forum... that is the definition of SpecParanoia
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom