Can too thick of oil be damaging?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by FordCapriDriver
Originally Posted by RDY4WAR
What about on cold starts? On a 50 degree morning, a more viscous 20w-50 would take longer to circulate to the top of the engine than a less viscous 10w-30, correct? If that is correct, wouldn't that contribute to more long term wear?

Actually until you get below freezing the difference is negligible

That was not the case with my 1990 Ford Tempo. Very noticeable difference in engine performance between 5-10-30 M1 and M1 15-50. Sluggest.
 
Originally Posted by Shannow
wemay, nice effort at thin statesmanship.

GM, speccing the same engines in the US for Dex 1, and Oz as Dex 2 tells you something about what the engineers really think for the two markets.

The OP asked would thick damage anything...the answer is no.

edit...unlike the other situation...


In response to the op, i agree, it wouldn't. Now I'll ask the mods to change my user name to "The Statesman"👨â€ðŸ’¼. But everything i stated is true.

...and i would never go below what was recommended in my manual unless the engineers back spec'd the recommendation.
 
Last edited:
Just for grins, I bought some clearance M1 15W-50 EP years ago and ran it in our now long departed Gen 6 Accord 5spd sedan.
The engine was noticeably smoother and quieter as well as notably less eager to rev. The VTEC worked just fine. Fuel economy suffered a little, but little enough that the last tank run on this oil actually yielded better fuel economy than the first tank I ran on the M1 AFE 0W-30 that replaced it.
In appropriate ambient temperature conditions, I'd doubt that a couple of grades thicker than recommended would cause any problems.
 
Back in the day,I put GTX 20W50 in everything. My cars,motorcycles,and all lawn equipment got it
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by wemay
Originally Posted by Shannow
wemay, nice effort at thin statesmanship.

GM, speccing the same engines in the US for Dex 1, and Oz as Dex 2 tells you something about what the engineers really think for the two markets.

The OP asked would thick damage anything...the answer is no.

edit...unlike the other situation...


In response to the op, i agree, it wouldn't. Now I'll ask the mods to change my user name to "The Statesman"👨â€ðŸ’¼. But everything i stated is true.

...and i would never go below what was recommended in my manual unless the engineers back spec'd the recommendation.


Hi wemay,

Ford back-spec'd my 1960's designed 4.9l (300ci) to 5w-20. Up until around 2005 the engine was spec'd for 10w-30. Around 2008 (and again 2015) I tried 5w-20 and it was a disaster. The engine knocked, timing gears banged and the engine was very noisy. IMO it was a mistake and went back to 10w-30 and everyone is happy now.
 
Back spec'ing to me is a joke. Now THAT is cafe. If an engine "originally" was spec'd for a 20wt,that's a different thing and I can fathom the engine being engineered to use that weight of oil.
 
That part of my post was in jest but the ... never materialized.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Shannow
wemay, nice effort at thin statesmanship.

GM, speccing the same engines in the US for Dex 1, and Oz as Dex 2 tells you something about what the engineers really think for the two markets.

The OP asked would thick damage anything...the answer is no.

edit...unlike the other situation...


Yep, the engineers really know that the thinner you go the more chances of engine wear. I'm sure many who have been here awhile, and in these discussions have seen this thread:

https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/4290245/Ford_4.6L_DOHC_oil_opinions_-_

Similar thread:
http://mach1registry.org/forums/showthread.php?t=112712
 
Originally Posted by SonofJoe


- Low VII polymer loading (one of the lowest for the 'typical' viscosity grades).



I'd (naively) assumed this was directly related to the difference between the two numbers.

Since this is less for 15W40, I'd guessed it would have a lower polymer loading.

Evidently there's a bit more to it....
 
It doesn't work that way. If you go by the 'gap' between the oil's W-rating & its 'weight', a 5W30 (gap = 25) should contain a similar amount of VII as a 15W40 (gap = 25). The reality is the 5W30, for a given base oil slate & polymer, will always contain more VII.
20W50s are 'special' in terms of their low VII loading because they have more 'headroom' on relative CCS viscosity than other grades (9,500 cP for 20W50 vs 6,600 cP for a 5W30).
Finally, it's also worth pointing out that heavy oils like 20W50s are in reality more shear tolerant than low viscosity oils. Blend a tight 20W50 to say a KV100 of 16.31cst (the lower limit of J-300) and the HTHS will still be on grade. Put the oil through the very (unrealistically) severe KO30 cycle shear test and yes the oil will shear out of grade (to a heavy 20W40) but so what? You'll still have an oil that's viscometrically protecting against the worst wear.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Patman
Originally Posted by tcp71
a 100C 20w50 wt oil has a viscosity of around 18CST. A 40C 5w30 oil has a viscosity around 45CST. The viscosity differences of hot vs. cold oil are so much greater than the differences between 30 and 50 wt oil at operating temperature that all our engines must explode before we hit operating temperature. Short trippers beware.


But then we also need to worry about what cst will that 20w50 be on a cold start, even on a 40 or 50 degree day. It'll be a lot thicker than 5w30 would be.
At 40 or 50 * day the 20W-50 will not have pumping problems.
 
Originally Posted by SonofJoe
... However it might be worth mentioning some of the very positive benefits of plopping a 'tight' Group I 20W50 in your engine...

- Greater Minimum Oil Film Thickness & higher HTHS. ...
- Low Noack Volatility ...
- Low VII polymer loading (one of the lowest for the 'typical' viscosity grades). Put this together with that low Noack, and you'll deffo see this reflected in low piston deposits on tests like the Sequence IIIF/IIIG. You won't get late onset oil control ring stickage (& out of control oil loss) with a tight Group I 20W50!
- Very good oil solvency. ...
- it can be produced on fully depreciated plants ...
And yet, despite all those advantages, you use 0W-20 yourself (as I believe you've mentioned in other threads)? That's interesting, or telling!
As a compromise in a mild climate, what do you think of 5W-20 or 10W-30 in an engine for which 0W-20 is specified? I've switched to 5W-20 myself, in hope of forestalling the infamous Toyota "ring-stickage." (I will disagree about calling it "late-onset," because it often occurs so early.)
Thanks!
 
Originally Posted by CR94
Originally Posted by SonofJoe
... However it might be worth mentioning some of the very positive benefits of plopping a 'tight' Group I 20W50 in your engine...

- Greater Minimum Oil Film Thickness & higher HTHS. ...
- Low Noack Volatility ...
- Low VII polymer loading (one of the lowest for the 'typical' viscosity grades). Put this together with that low Noack, and you'll deffo see this reflected in low piston deposits on tests like the Sequence IIIF/IIIG. You won't get late onset oil control ring stickage (& out of control oil loss) with a tight Group I 20W50!
- Very good oil solvency. ...
- it can be produced on fully depreciated plants ...
And yet, despite all those advantages, you use 0W-20 yourself (as I believe you've mentioned in other threads)? That's interesting, or telling!
As a compromise in a mild climate, what do you think of 5W-20 or 10W-30 in an engine for which 0W-20 is specified? I've switched to 5W-20 myself, in hope of forestalling the infamous Toyota "ring-stickage." (I will disagree about calling it "late-onset," because it often occurs so early.)
Thanks!


You're quite right. I do use 0W20, not 20W50. That's for a couple of reasons.

First off my car's still under warranty. Suzuki spec 0W20 so that's what the car gets. I have had cause to claim on the warranty (an expensive LED dial/trip computer went wonky). The claim went through easy peasy because I'd had my yearly service done at the Suzuki dealership.

Second, when I buy cars, I prioritise fuel economy over every other thing (looks, performance, its ability to haul coal!). I don't think global warming is fake news. I want my grandson (plus his brother/sister due in January) to have a good life, so I do my bit & drive a car that does 72 mpg. For that you need 0W20 (not seen 0W16 here yet).

Third, because of what I did, I can probably still get oil for free, even the 'good stuff', if needed. Oil cost isn't a factor for me, nor is it for you, but for a lot of folks around the world it is. Hopefully my comments will make them feel a bit better about buying the cheap 20W50 they can afford.

Regarding oil control ring stick, my understanding is that if you're going to see it at all, it kicks in after 40k to 50k miles. For me now, that's a decade's worth of driving but before retiring, that might have been as low as a couple of years. Also, if you live in somewhere with very cold winters or constantly drive like a maniac, I'd expect to it to kick in even earlier. So it depends...

Fast or slow, it's definitely 'a thing' that should be being addressed by the industry but isn't. The trick is using a low Noack oil (deffo sub 10% & preferably sub 7%). That means the highest W-rating & lowest weight you can tolerate, full synthetic & interestingly the lowest oil spec (to minimise DI).

Hope that helps...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Shannow

After a movie (for example), he'd come out, back out of the carpark, and straight into a burnout...all on BP Corse 25W50...he never had any issues, in spite of being insane.


I used to work with that guy, LOL

He would crank up his F150, drive across the parking lot, then slam it WOT until he disappeared into the night. His truck lasted for many years, but he bought a lot of rear tires, LOL
 
Originally Posted by gfh77665
Originally Posted by Shannow

After a movie (for example), he'd come out, back out of the carpark, and straight into a burnout...all on BP Corse 25W50...he never had any issues, in spite of being insane.


I used to work with that guy, LOL

He would crank up his F150, drive across the parking lot, then slam it WOT until he disappeared into the night. His truck lasted for many years, but he bought a lot of rear tires, LOL


I had a buddy with an '02 Mustang GT who did that with lord knows what in the pan in Edmonton in the winter. He spun a rod bearing then drove it all the way to Ontario knocking.
 
Originally Posted by SonofJoe
It doesn't work that way. If you go by the 'gap' between the oil's W-rating & its 'weight', a 5W30 (gap = 25) should contain a similar amount of VII as a 15W40 (gap = 25). The reality is the 5W30, for a given base oil slate & polymer, will always contain more VII.
20W50s are 'special' in terms of their low VII loading because they have more 'headroom' on relative CCS viscosity than other grades (9,500 cP for 20W50 vs 6,600 cP for a 5W30).
Finally, it's also worth pointing out that heavy oils like 20W50s are in reality more shear tolerant than low viscosity oils. Blend a tight 20W50 to say a KV100 of 16.31cst (the lower limit of J-300) and the HTHS will still be on grade. Put the oil through the very (unrealistically) severe KO30 cycle shear test and yes the oil will shear out of grade (to a heavy 20W40) but so what? You'll still have an oil that's viscometrically protecting against the worst wear.


Thanks for the info.

This'll probably overstretch you patience, but how would you guess my 50/50 mix of CPC SAE 40 (probably GRP 1, though I don't know that for a fact) and Delvac MX 15W40 would compare?

I'd guess simple (or maybe not so simple) dilution would bring the polymer loading down further.
 
Typically a Group I 15W40 will contain about 7.5% of liquid 25 SSI OCP VII (equivalent to about 0.75% of solid rubber).

A 50:50 mix of 15W40 & SAE 40, containing 3.25% of VII would look like a very nice 20W40. I personally love 20W40s! I tend to steer people to 20W50s only because 20W40s are virtually impossible to find on shelves. I've put 20W40 through some of the toughest engine tests out there and they always come up smelling of roses. Of course they're not great on fuel economy but as out & out lubricants, they're the dogs bollocks.
 
Yay! I've developed The Dogs Bollocks, (and it didn't hurt).

You can actually buy an off-the-shelf Castrol (Thailand) 20W40 here. Marketed as motorcycle oil, SG I think, and labelled "Castrol Go". Quite cheap

I thought of it as a car oil but I wasn't sure if I'd be sacrificing friction modifier benefits using a motorcycle oil, and I've got a lot of oil to use up anyway.
 
20W40 in locomotives (12X645 2-strokes) actually reduces oil consumption compared to straight SAE40. Chevron essentially blended 10W30 with SAE30 to arrive at 15W30, but it didn't catch on as I thought it would.
I mix SAE 40 with 10W30, or SAE 30 with 15W40, both good to a little below freezing, while shooting for a HTHS of around 3.8.
Right now I have 50/50 SAE30 & SAE 40 that I will have to drain if it gets too cold outside.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom