Assuming you did enough changes to flush the residuals at what point would you start seeing a normalizing of metals within the oil? 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 mi?
How do you identify residual vs wear metals in a
On a modern new engine, how much break in wear is being expected? (Rebuild is a different animal)
I was sloppy with language. I meant until the number stopped trended downward at such a rate they were essentially useless when trying to chart the engines trend.
On my HD Engines when we do a reman we change at total engine miles of 5,000 mi, 15,000 mi and 30,000 mi and every 30,000 mi thereafter (manufacturer and lube supplier approved extended drain). We pull the first sample at 60,000 mi absent any obvious issues. However those engines last a million miles.
We only do gliders and pre-egr engines now so we only get remans.
I'm curious on a passenger vehicle where to start. Since the design B50 is 150,000 mi instead of 850,000 mi I'm assuming it would become reliable at a lower mileage.
Ah, OK. Makes sense.
Some members here have started sampling with the initial change and for the life of the vehicle. That's dedication and I enjoy reading the results. It would be interesting to review those cases and get an idea of when a modern mass produced engine trends normally. Maybe 10 or 15K as you suggest? I think it would depend on the interval and design. ARI has me changing my Escape every 7500 miles from the get go, so if I wanted to trend, I'm not sure how skewed the results would be compared to universal averages, from changing the initial fill at 7500.
didn't do oil analysis but the mpg didn't really drop until i hit 50k miles and then they kept dropping until 80k. On 90k now, I think I finally have a run-in engine.
Your MPG went down (or up) at 50K? I track every tank fill-up and MPG on my Tacoma, and saw the fuel mileage go up at around 10K miles, which I'd think is where the engine was finally broken-in. The spike at 8,500 miles was on a long trip, whereas most of the other data points were basically the same driving cycle - ie, to/from work commute (50 miles round trip).
View attachment 27260
An excellent visual reminder of why small fuel economy changes are irrelevant and cannot be correlated to a single variable such as an oil additive. We often see people claiming "I added X-additive to my oil and the fuel economy increased by 1 MPG" or something similar. Totally lost in this noise.Your MPG went down (or up) at 50K? I track every tank fill-up and MPG on my Tacoma, and saw the fuel mileage go up at around 10K miles, which I'd think is where the engine was finally broken-in. The spike at 8,500 miles was on a long trip, whereas most of the other data points were basically the same driving cycle - ie, to/from work commute (50 miles round trip).
View attachment 27260
An excellent visual reminder of why small fuel economy changes are irrelevant and cannot be correlated to a single variable such as an oil additive. We often see people claiming "I added X-additive to my oil and the fuel economy increased by 1 MPG" or something similar. Totally lost in this noise.
Thank you for the post. I think from now on I will link that chart every time I see one of those threads.
100% Here you go - 35K of Fuelly data with all my mods/maintenance that could impact mpgs.An excellent visual reminder of why small fuel economy changes are irrelevant and cannot be correlated to a single variable such as an oil additive. We often see people claiming "I added X-additive to my oil and the fuel economy increased by 1 MPG" or something similar. Totally lost in this noise.
Thank you for the post. I think from now on I will link that chart every time I see one of those threads.