Or cheaper. A used battery is 1000x richer source of raw materials than ore from a mine.They can obviously be recycled, but its far more expensive than just mining new materials.
And the materials in the battery are not consumed.
Or cheaper. A used battery is 1000x richer source of raw materials than ore from a mine.They can obviously be recycled, but its far more expensive than just mining new materials.
LOL. Interesting, especially since you don't know my brother or much about the NY grid. Best we stop here or one of us is going to get booted, since you're quick with dishing out insults this thread can take an ugly turn.You didn't answer. And in doing so did answer that your brother doesn't know Jack.
I am a retired engineer for whom my daily driver has been an EV for 12 years. Often eat lunch with a manager who works for the local electric utility. "What is the big problem with EVs on the grid? Not knowing when 250 kW loads will suddenly appear." He said looking at the raw data for my account he can't really see the EV. Looks too much like a heat pump.
I think there's some genuine concern to be had for this process when it isn't with LiFe batteries, as most lithium-based batteries get more prone to shorting and producing fires as they age and dendrites form, and that's certainly not something you want happening in your home. A robust BMS would be an absolute must in this usage case, as well as a containment system that prevents fire spread in the case of an event. From a reuse perspective, it's absolutely the "right thing", as avoiding disposal is key to reducing the overall lifecycle emissions of the product.No. Those darned innovative capitalists will find ways to make money off used and depleted batteries.
Oh wait, they are doing that right now, if you'd bother to search.
One of the greatest utilizations of a used EV battery is to repurpose for home energy storage. An EV battery with 50% of it's original capacity simply has less energy density than it used to have, otherwise works just fine. Usually only one module goes sour so disassembly of the battery yields a number of high capacity modules to build home energy storage.
I don't see any but Chinese batteries catching on fire.I think there's some genuine concern to be had for this process when it isn't with LiFe batteries, as most lithium-based batteries get more prone to shorting and producing fires as they age and dendrites form, and that's certainly not something you want happening in your home. A robust BMS would be an absolute must in this usage case, as well as a containment system that prevents fire spread in the case of an event. From a reuse perspective, it's absolutely the "right thing", as avoiding disposal is key to reducing the overall lifecycle emissions of the product.
Are you including grid-scale battery fires (of which there are many examples)? How about Samsung's phone battery fires? GM's recall of the Chevy Bolt (for fires)?I don't see any but Chinese batteries catching on fire.
OK, Chinese and Korean batteries.Are you including grid-scale battery fires (of which there are many examples)? How about Samsung's phone battery fires? GM's recall of the Chevy Bolt (for fires)?
But somehow Tesla manages to produce safe batteries.Yes, Chinese batteries (and in particular cheap Chinese goods using Chinese batteries like e-bikes/scooters...etc) are the most numerous in their examples, but the risk exists with all the major lithium-based chemistries (considerably less for LiFe as noted) and aged batteries present higher risk than new batteries (due to dendrite formation for example), so one needs to be even more careful, and take greater precautions when repurposing cells, particularly when they will be co-located with a huge number of other cells, and placed inside a domicile.
Tesla's grid storage batteries have had a considerable number of fires, and their cars aren't without fires.OK, Chinese and Korean batteries.
But somehow Tesla manages to produce safe batteries.
Name a Walmart which hasn't eventually "had a fire."Tesla's grid storage batteries have had a considerable number of fires, and their cars aren't without fires.
Speaking of grid-scale battery fires, Moss Landing has caught fire numerous times at this point. The Elkhorn expansion (Tesla batteries) caught fire in 2022. After the subsequent 2025 fire in Stage 1 (LG batteries), all of the batteries were taken offline. Elkhorn is still not back in service.
- The Victoria "Big Battery" in Australia (Tesla batteries) caught fire in 2021.
- A mobile Supercharger w/MegaPack in California caught fire in 2023.
- A Powerwall caught fire in a garage in California in 2023
- The Bouldercombe battery in Australia (Tesla batteries) caught fire in 2023.
- The Tilburg battery in the Netherlands (Tesla batteries) caught fire in 2025.
Eh, that's pretty weak.Name a Walmart which hasn't eventually "had a fire."
Musk Ticked off Norway which bought ALOT of Teslas. He criticized their strong union stance which bit him in the rear. Tesla employees in Norway stopped delivering vehicles and refused to drive them off the cargo ships. EV sales have dipped in some EU countries. In fact in the UK auto makers have sold record numbers of suvs ticking off lawmakers etc.Tesla is struggling in EU and BYD is gaining ground.
I read in Japlonik recently that EVs have not gained as much traction as expected so far.
There's been speculation but from reading Ford is building a midsized ev truck and some hint it might be called the Ranchero from the models past. Hopefully with a denser battery. Rumors floating around are that Tesla too is looking to build a small to midsize truck as the Cybertruck hasn't quite caught on.there's ord says a big EV related announcement is coming August 11th. New models and platforms it sounds like
“Speaking on an earnings call on July 30, Farley revealed to investors that the company is planning to announce a new EV strategy in August, which will help position the brand against competition from Chinese automakers.”
“On Aug. 11, that will be a big day for all of us at Ford," Farley said on the call. "We will be in Kentucky to share more about our plans to design and build a breakthrough electric vehicle and a platform in the U.S. This is a Model-T moment for us at Ford. A chance to bring a new family of vehicles to the world that offer incredible technology, efficiency, space, and features.”
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a65563894/ford-breakthrough-ev-announcement-coming/
Numerous sources find the probability of a Tesla fire is equal or less than that of a gasoline fire in an ICE. Mean old dangerous gasoline! Properly handled is perfectly safe. Just as with lithium-ion batteries.I've now provided numerous examples of Tesla battery fires (the most concerning being the grid-scale battery fires, given the small number of projects they've been used in), which refutes your claims here and bolsters my argument that any sort of battery recycling program, which I support, and I've been clear on that, needs to ensure that the batteries are sufficiently contained so that in the event of a fire, we aren't burning people's houses down. This is not an unreasonable position.
Norway's loss.Musk Ticked off Norway which bought ALOT of Teslas. He criticized their strong union stance which bit him in the rear. Tesla employees in Norway stopped delivering vehicles and refused to drive them off the cargo ships. EV sales have dipped in some EU countries. In fact in the UK auto makers have sold record numbers of suvs ticking off lawmakers etc.
That doesn't address my point.Numerous sources find the probability of a Tesla fire is equal or less than that of a gasoline fire in an ICE. Mean old dangerous gasoline! Properly handled is perfectly safe. Just as with lithium-ion batteries.
Millions of Teslas on the road, there will be a few fires. Just as with 4500 Walmarts in the USA some will have visits by fire trucks.
This is why I have a garage that is 50ft from my house. ICE and EV can burn. Why park a vessel full of inflammable liquid under or beside my bed? Why stuff a bunch of batteries there?That doesn't address my point.
We don't routinely take 10+ year old automotive electrical systems (the source of most ICE vehicle fires) and put them in our basements tethered to 10's of thousands of BTU of self-oxidizing fuel. But this is exactly what we are doing with EV battery recycling, which is why, as I've said several times now, there needs to be a safety-centric approach to this process that prevents us from incinerating entire families in the event thermal runaway happens. And these events DO happen. And they are considerably harder to manage than your typical ICE vehicle electrical fire, or even a gasoline fire.
Only a handful of grid-scale battery projects, with a significant number of fires.
There is a considerable difference between an EV catching fire underway, on a highway, vs the battery pack from said EV in your basement, past its useful end of life in transportation service, so more likely to experience a failure, burning down your house, potentially with you and your family in it.
This hand waving doesn't further the conversation.
Again, I'm quite pro recycling, but we need to ensure this is done safely so that we don't needlessly create tragedy.
Because land is expensive and people like to live in single family home.This is why I have a garage that is 50ft from my house. ICE and EV can burn. Why park a vessel full of inflammable liquid under or beside my bed? Why stuff a bunch of batteries there?
My Toyota hybrid had a fire warning. My HMG ev didnt.Because land is expensive and people like to live in single family home.
You can build them in mid-rise apartment with all sorts of safety mechanism, but many if not most Americans love to have walk in access to their car instead of going through elevator with stroller full of groceries or dolly at home.
I don't think people would get their house burn down that frequently but we are probably just past the learning curve of building batteries in scale for EV, and we still have some fire once in a while (I'm looking at you Hyundai). We will eventually get there and layer up safety mechanism, but it will still need redundancy before insurance companies practically ban them with premium increase like we have gotten from those wild fires.
This was a good story, I read it previously too.https://www.jalopnik.com/1930598/ev-transition-problems-automakers/
"Five years ago, most analysts assumed that EVs were heading toward critical mass and that once they consumed around 20-25 percent of the market, they would swiftly take over. That hasn't happened outside of smaller countries and China, and certainly not in the U.S., because going from a gas-powered car to an EV isn't an easy leap – it's more like a series of steps. You have to deal with charging, software issues, and variable battery performance in extremes of weather. You also have to spend thousands if not tens of thousands more dollars to buy an EV than you would on a traditional gas car."
Wow that would be wild if that pans out the way you think. I see a ton of Teslas around here. I'm not sure they're dead in the USA. Tesla is going to be releasing a more affordable EV option.This was a good story, I read it previously too.
My thoughts =
EVs are dead in the USA. By that I mean we are not going to see anywhere near a 25% BEV market saturation on US highways anytime in the next 30 years. Will they completely go away, no, not at all, they will fill a void for those that they make sense.
Maybe in time we will get to that 25% but I wont be alive to see it (gosh I hate that thought)
I will say one thing IS CERTAIN. You are about to witness a MASSIVE crash in the EV market. When the sales numbers come out for the last quarter of 2025. Typically reported towards the end of Jan 2026
So he cant see the EV?....
I am a retired engineer for whom my daily driver has been an EV for 12 years. Often eat lunch with a manager who works for the local electric utility. "What is the big problem with EVs on the grid? Not knowing when 250 kW loads will suddenly appear." He said looking at the raw data for my account he can't really see the EV. Looks too much like a heat pump.