Amsoil in GM 3.6L DI engine?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: prax


ILSAC syns are cheap?

If by cheap oil you mean a conventional oil, then I would agree that he shouldn't use a conventional oil.

The issue is with API certification, not syn vs dino.


I'm being reminded of Tommy Boy where the guy at the parts store wants a "guarantee" printed on the box...

...except this is for an oil with a guarantee that far exceeds the specs (and most other oils).
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: BeanCounter


I've had plenty of folks try to argue this lousy point before because they just wanted it so bad not to be true. It doesn't prohibit you from pouring whatever oil you you so choose in your vehicle. Get over it already.


Nice marketing quotes (and I will not quote it again.. Next time just post the links.. IT's not like we have not seen that before
smirk2.gif
)

Take that to GM and ask them what they think of it. Make sure that you cover the non API symbol oil and extended OCI past the OLM.

I have. The 4 manufactures that I've TALKED to (not dealers)and ALL said that you NEED to follow the manual for warranty requirements. IF you do not, EXPECT some "issues" (and I don't need "ISSUES" when a vehicle is down)

Look I've HAD an manufacture take my receipts, look into a book to make sure that the oils I was using MET their requirements for OCI. (and they DID check to make sure that I did follow the length of each OCI)

If you want to fall back on Amsoil's warranty go for it. The quote you have above I question...

"AMSOIL offers a warranty that covers the cost of repair or replacement of a proven mechanically sound engine damaged as a result of using AMSOIL synthetic motor oil. However, it has never happened."

Amsoil has NEVER paid on a engine failing? Really? I have read here they they have from a sponsor so who is not correct?

I do not base my reputation on some marketing words. It seems that you do.
20.gif


I like Amsoil. I USE their products. But I'm not going to use anything that could be a problem in getting my engine fixed *IF* I have a problem. And I'd NEVER recommend to ANYONE to NOT FOLLOW what the manufacture (WHO PAYS FOR ANY REPAIRS) recommends in their manual for the warranty period.

To each their own.

Bill

PS: So according to you, I can take some 20-50 oil and pour it in my motor. When its 15 below zero and my engine fails due to non flow of oil at that temp the manufacture of the engine will replace it?

Your words;

"It doesn't prohibit you from pouring whatever oil you you so choose in"

Let me know how that works for you.
crackmeup2.gif
 
I agree with hounddog and beancounter 100%. The last thing I look at when deciding which oil to use is how it will affect my vehicle warranty because in the real world no one cares. As long as you take care of your vehicle you don't have anything to worry about.
 
Originally Posted By: iunderpressure
I agree with hounddog and beancounter 100%. The last thing I look at when deciding which oil to use is how it will affect my vehicle warranty because in the real world no one cares. As long as you take care of your vehicle you don't have anything to worry about.


I used to think that before my iron block/head motor needed head gaskets @ 61k miles. Never been over heated or abused.

Was very happy that since I followed the manual they fixed the engine and provided a rent-a-car with everything paid for.

First time in over 30 years of owning and driving vehicles.

Like I said, to each their own.
 
Originally Posted By: BeanCounter

No, Amsoil will not void your warranty. Look up the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. A manufacturer cannot void your warranty due to your choice of oil, that meets the necessary specifications...like GM 6094, unless they provide the oil they prefer free of charge, and so on and so forth.
To the best of my knowledge, we don't a Canadian version of the Act up here.
 
Originally Posted By: addyguy
There is no issue here - use the 'XL' line of Amsoil oils, and you won't have a problem. That's why Amsoil HAS the XL line - for situations just like this!
Their XL line is API certified but is NOT GM6094M certified.
 
Originally Posted By: tomcat27
According to Pennzoil, the deposits on the intake valves of DI engines is due to VI, not volatility in general.
Can you please point me to the web link where Pennzoil posts this conclusion? Thx.
 
Thanks everybody for sharing their knowledge and experiences. I'm more or less sold on Bill's advice that I should follow GM's recommendations in the manual. I certainly don't want to risk my 2nd biggest investment to prove a very likely fact that Amsoil's oils meet or exceed those specs.
 
Quote:
The *official* answer from Amsoil is that they don't necessarily go through every single spec in order to save certification money.



That's surely not a quote. It may be something someone said on a message board. I'm quite sure that they do extensive testing of every new evolution of oil that gets pulled out of whomever's collective behinds. What they don't pay is the ante (never ending tribute to the creators) for the right to wear the cert label.


Quote:
I used to think that before my iron block/head motor needed head gaskets @ 61k miles. Never been over heated or abused.

Was very happy that since I followed the manual they fixed the engine and provided a rent-a-car with everything paid for.


..and you blindly allowed them to take a scope up your sphincter for a non-lube related issue just because you wanted to indulge them in seeking an unrelated "out"? That's not the freedom fighting - live free or die Bill that I've come to know and love. Sounds more like a "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" type appeasement, if you ask me.
grin2.gif


What if they had pulled a "did you do anything different?" old standby dodge?? Whatever it was ..that would be IT!!

Dealerships should be routinely subjected to some "postal" event. The art of warranty dodging has way outpaced any warranty fraud. The fraudulent behavior clearly has a bias toward the dealership being the real criminal.
 
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: BeanCounter


I've had plenty of folks try to argue this lousy point before because they just wanted it so bad not to be true. It doesn't prohibit you from pouring whatever oil you you so choose in your vehicle. Get over it already.


Nice marketing quotes (and I will not quote it again.. Next time just post the links.. IT's not like we have not seen that before
smirk2.gif
)


Stop putting random bold and/or re-sized words throughout an entire post and we'll talk. I, on the other hand, like to provide more concrete evidence in a discussion versus what your opinion and/or unverifiable experiences are.

Quote:
Take that to GM and ask them what they think of it. Make sure that you cover the non API symbol oil and extended OCI past the OLM.

I have. The 4 manufactures that I've TALKED to (not dealers)and ALL said that you NEED to follow the manual for warranty requirements. IF you do not, EXPECT some "issues" (and I don't need "ISSUES" when a vehicle is down)


Well, since you are going to be pompous about it, I have called GM corporate and 2 dealerships multiple times about the issue and they have, contrary to your omniscient information, all verified that this is not the case.
I'll have to call them back and tell them they are wrong since a Bill from Utah disagrees...

Forgive me if it comes off rude, but I'm sorry I don't take "I talked to..." as a verifiable argument to actual, real information. I've *talked* to some of them to, and they didn't say "follow your manual" as a default response. I'm sure my comments about contacting GM above will get some ignorant response from you as well, so I can play that game, too.

My manual mentions what GM recommends and what the oil must "meet or exceed". This is real world stuff. Welcome to it.
wink.gif


For what it's worth, "talking to a manufacturer", as I'm sure you realize, very likely consists of you sitting on the phone with some phone bank employee, right?
I too have made that call, but I also trust as much, if not more, the service manager at a dealership who will allow or deny any claim that I might bring them.

Quote:
Look I've HAD an manufacture take my receipts, look into a book to make sure that the oils I was using MET their requirements for OCI. (and they DID check to make sure that I did follow the length of each OCI)


#1 Checking their "book" does not prove that a mechanical failure was caused by oil. Good try.

#2 Enlighten us on how they "check to make sure" you ran the proper OCI. I'd love to hear how they proved exactly how many miles you drove on the oil.

Quote:
If you want to fall back on Amsoil's warranty go for it. The quote you have above I question...


I don't care if you question how the sun comes up in the morning. I LOVE having this high of a quality of oil to "fall back on"; especially considering the ratio of oil changes with Amsoil to the warranty issues that we hear so often...

Quote:
"AMSOIL offers a warranty that covers the cost of repair or replacement of a proven mechanically sound engine damaged as a result of using AMSOIL synthetic motor oil. However, it has never happened."

Amsoil has NEVER paid on a engine failing? Really? I have read here they they have from a sponsor so who is not correct?

I do not base my reputation on some marketing words. It seems that you do.
20.gif



I'm not sure how many engines have failed because of Amsoil. I haven't been present for 100% of all warranty submissions for the company; have you?

There you go again with "I read..."
I must have missed the debate class period in school that taught us to use "I talked to...", "I heard...", and "I read..." as supporting points for an argument.
Please forgive me if I don't drain my oil now and tell Amsoil to go jump because a guy on an online forum "read" that 1 person may or may not have had a warranty issue with Amsoil.

Quote:
I like Amsoil. I USE their products. But I'm not going to use anything that could be a problem in getting my engine fixed *IF* I have a problem. And I'd NEVER recommend to ANYONE to NOT FOLLOW what the manufacture (WHO PAYS FOR ANY REPAIRS) recommends in their manual for the warranty period.


"I" is used a lot here.
I concur; I think "YOU" should do whatever your heart desires. Just quit asserting to everyone what you think, and trying to confuse it with FACTS.


Quote:
To each their own.

Bill

PS: So according to you, I can take some 20-50 oil and pour it in my motor. When its 15 below zero and my engine fails due to non flow of oil at that temp the manufacture of the engine will replace it?

Your words;

"It doesn't prohibit you from pouring whatever oil you you so choose in"

Let me know how that works for you.
crackmeup2.gif



Since reading comprehension is a premium in today's world, I'll let you in on it: I was telling you that your life will go on and you don't need to worry yourself with feeling obligated to run an oil simply because it can legitimately be run in a motor without warranty's being voided, the earth becoming dark, and universes being sucked into black holes.

It is apparent that you are quite against particular oils (as if the forum needed this thread alone to tell...) and that is fine. But your emphasis on bold words and smiley faces doesn't suggest anymore reality to the situation than what little that has been displayed.

The reality of things are that you have 2 entity's supplying warranties: 1 if it is a mechanical fault, and the other if it is an oil/lubrication fault.
Your BEST scenario includes a dealership denying a warranty, manufacturer denying a warranty, AND Amsoil denying a warranty (as if the oil run properly is going to cause more damage than a lesser quality oil would under the same scenario - not the first logical fallacy present).
I guess it is all just one big conspiracy...
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan

Dealerships should be routinely subjected to some "postal" event. The art of warranty dodging has way outpaced any warranty fraud. The fraudulent behavior clearly has a bias toward the dealership being the real criminal.


Exactly, Gary.
Precisely why I contacted 2 dealerships who both agreed Amsoil would not void my warranty and they would not void my warranty because of it. That's half the battle if they are in agreement. Corporate telling me they agree on the phone (after speaking to and asking a manager) is just icing on the cake for me.

There are just some people who are going to believe what they want their mind to accept, and that is fine, too.
 
Originally Posted By: BeanCounter
Since reading comprehension is a premium in today's world, I'll let you in on it: I was telling you that your life will go on and you don't need to worry yourself with feeling obligated to run an oil simply because it can legitimately be run in a motor without warranty's being voided...


Bill is not the one with reading comprehension problems.

Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Will the use of Amsoil VOID your 100,000 mile warranty? No. Will it make it more of a hassle *IF* you have problems? Yes...


Quote:
If the motor does not call out for syn, GM is not going to get on your case if you run Amsoil XL oil since its API SL/SM.


There's nothing in the M-M act that says they got to pay up right away. The dealership can deny the claim and force you to sue, and that takes time and as Bill says
Quote:
Will it make it more of a hassle *IF* you have problems? Yes...
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Quote:
The *official* answer from Amsoil is that they don't necessarily go through every single spec in order to save certification money.



That's surely not a quote. It may be something someone said on a message board. I'm quite sure that they do extensive testing of every new evolution of oil that gets pulled out of whomever's collective behinds. What they don't pay is the ante (never ending tribute to the creators) for the right to wear the cert label.

This is the response from a local amsoil dealer in my area after asked warranty questions and Amsoil not being on the GM approved oil list.
Originally Posted By: My Local Amsoil Dealer

It is a valid question but as far as manufacturers officially recommending specific brands, generally there is a business arrangement or fee involved to get this recommendation. You may see specific brands listed in some domestic and European owners manuals and it is my understanding that it would cost a company like AMSOIL a six-figure sum to garner such a recommendation. They simply refuse to get into this game. That being said, do some AMSOIL products meet specs like GM 6094M? Absolutely. AMSOIL goes to great lengths to make sure that the spec is met. If it didn't I can assure you that AMSOIL would not put the spec on the label.
 
I think warranty work has more to do with the dealership than your oil. I had a 2004 Jeep Rubicon that I lifted and did all kinds of off road mods to. The dealership I bought it from ended up closing. I had a couple warranty claims. I had to shop dealerships. Some wouldn't touch it because I had done so much to it, but I found one that would cover everything that was still factory under warranty including a U-joint on my lifted vehicle.

I had a 2005 Ford F-250 with the problem child 6.0L diesel. I bought it used and started having problems right away, but Bill Collin's in Louisville took me under their wing as if they sold me the vehicle. I had the turbo replace, transmission rebuild, egr problems, power sliding window rebuild, heating and air switch cluster replaced, and I forgot what else. Every time they gave me a rental car from enterprise which is in the same building. Not once did I have a single problem with having to prove where I bought my oil or what oil was in it.

In my experience many dealerships don't want to deal with you if you didn't buy your vehicle from them, but shop dealerships someone wants your business and will gain your future business.
 
Originally Posted By: prax


There's nothing in the M-M act that says they got to pay up right away. The dealership can deny the claim and force you to sue, and that takes time and as Bill says
Quote:
Will it make it more of a hassle *IF* you have problems? Yes...


You all are really reaching on this.
Hypotheticals and "if" statements as your only support?
Please.
 
Originally Posted By: iunderpressure
I think warranty work has more to do with the dealership than your oil. I had a 2004 Jeep Rubicon that I lifted and did all kinds of off road mods to. The dealership I bought it from ended up closing. I had a couple warranty claims. I had to shop dealerships. Some wouldn't touch it because I had done so much to it, but I found one that would cover everything that was still factory under warranty including a U-joint on my lifted vehicle.

I had a 2005 Ford F-250 with the problem child 6.0L diesel. I bought it used and started having problems right away, but Bill Collin's in Louisville took me under their wing as if they sold me the vehicle. I had the turbo replace, transmission rebuild, egr problems, power sliding window rebuild, heating and air switch cluster replaced, and I forgot what else. Every time they gave me a rental car from enterprise which is in the same building. Not once did I have a single problem with having to prove where I bought my oil or what oil was in it.

In my experience many dealerships don't want to deal with you if you didn't buy your vehicle from them, but shop dealerships someone wants your business and will gain your future business.


I agree with you.
A dealership that wants your warranty work can take a claim if they choose to. Precisely why I contact the local dealerships I would visit and ask if X voids my warranty in their view, etc.
 
Originally Posted By: iExcel
Originally Posted By: tomcat27
According to Pennzoil, the deposits on the intake valves of DI engines is due to VI, not volatility in general.
Can you please point me to the web link where Pennzoil posts this conclusion? Thx.


This statement was in the Q&A Pennzoil did for BITOG regarding PU. They say nothing more than what you have posted above. So it is basically an off the cuff response that leaves us without specifics. They (Pennzoil) certianly did not say their VI in PP, PU, or Pennzoil in general was better than Brand X, Y, and Z and thus will not contribute to deposits forming on the valves in DI engines.
 
I'm just wondering how much more oil Amsoil would sell if they did get the certs? It is possible that the sales would go up enough to pay for the testing.
 
Originally Posted By: BobsArmory
I'm just wondering how much more oil Amsoil would sell if they did get the certs? It is possible that the sales would go up enough to pay for the testing.


That's a good question, but I bet that 90% of those comfortable with running Amsoil aren't too torn over something like that. After all, the oil just has to "meet or exceed" the spec.

I would think they would have figured this in somewhere down the line of their business model, but you provoke a good question.
 
I think it's more complicated then that. Getting the appropriate certifications is much more involved than simply paying for them. The up front cost is just part of the burden required to get the certifications.

Other implications such as locking them down to a specific formulation and basestock supplier are very big considerations. Thus, everytime Amsoil would want to switch basestock suppliers or tweak their formula, they would have to be re-certified. Not cost effective at all, and does not allow for incremental product improvements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom