No, never heard of it until now! I'll check it out.
Cool
We'd love to have you as a member!
Cool

Uh, something doesn't sound right. My Caprice is around the 205-220 HP mark (and over 300lb-ft torque) and at almost exactly that weight, I ran a best of 15.7 @ 85mph. 160hp in a 4200lb boat is good for 18 second 1/4 miles. Either the weight's off, the power's off, or that track was off. Some LT1 caprices, with 260hp, run low 15s to high 14s @ 89-91. My times fall in line with that. Yours don't. Hence my confusion.quote:
Originally posted by Stoney57:
Try popping a 220 HP 3.0L V6 - 3.5L V6 into the TA, which weighs about 3800 lbs and see how well it does. Probably not very well, Torque is what moves you. I have a 1984 Oldsmobile 98 with a stock 79 olds 350 in it, the car is fully loaded power everything weighs well over 4200 lbs and runs 15.69 @ 89 mph at the drag strip. My stock 1979 350 rocket is rated at 160 HP and 275 foot pounds of torque, low numbers made the insurance companies happy.
thanx, that v6 hybrid is looking realy nice....quote:
Originally posted by Schmoe:
Hybird, with electric motor engaged. But even though, 212 will move your butt pretty good.
Originally posted by kevm14:
Uh, something doesn't sound right. My Caprice is around the 205-220 HP mark (and over 300lb-ft torque) and at almost exactly that weight, I ran a best of 15.7 @ 85mph. 160hp in a 4200lb boat is good for 18 second 1/4 miles. Either the weight's off, the power's off, or that track was off. Some LT1 caprices, with 260hp, run low 15s to high 14s @ 89-91. My times fall in line with that. Yours don't. Hence my confusion.
Yes, I know the rating of my engine is wrong, its more like 220 HP with over 300 foot pounds of torque, not sure, never had it on a dyno. All books and internet sites rate a olds 1979 350 at 160 HP. Small Block olds 403/350 have a short stroke and big bore creating decent torque. BTW I run Shell Rotella T 15W40 in it.
I'll bet you are not running a stock "pellet" cat converter, OEM spark curve, etc... those things really killed power in the late-70s. The only good thing is that it is cheap and easy to free up horses on cars from that era!quote:
Yes, I know the rating of my engine is wrong, its more like 220 HP with over 300 foot pounds of torque, not sure, never had it on a dyno. All books and internet sites rate a olds 1979 350 at 160 HP.
Sure. Most of the local "auto trader" type classifieds are online and you can check out what's available out there. Also check out the online "newspapers" classifieds for the local areas.quote:
Originally posted by Schmoe:
99.....are they selling them out there? Is there an online auction or something? Man, I would be willing to pay a fair price for a undamaged body and engine. I realize at this number of years, the interior will be pretty trashed, but that can be fixed.
LOL. Take your Accord and go find someone that has a bone stock 455SD T/A. Even in the smogger 70s these things still put out "huge" torque and decent power. They were THE last "musclecar" in my opinion. Anyways, it'll rip the Accord a new one without even trying. Don't even bother messing with one that has had some work done to it.quote:
Originally posted by Schmoe:
You can't tell me that a Honda Accord that's putting out 232 pounds of torque will get spanked by T/A now. No way, no how, no chance. I agree, in the 70's, 220 HP was a big thing, but again, that was in the 70's.
Awesome website! I don't know how I didn't stumble across it in the past. Love the production number and options info. Cool.quote:
Originally posted by Chevynut67:
No, never heard of it until now! I'll check it out.
CoolWe'd love to have you as a member!![]()
No doubt. Just pulling that stock cat off and replacing it with a piece of exhaust pipe was good for about 20 horse back then. Those cats were horrible.quote:
Originally posted by novadude:
I'll bet you are not running a stock "pellet" cat converter, OEM spark curve, etc... those things really killed power in the late-70s. The only good thing is that it is cheap and easy to free up horses on cars from that era!quote:
Yes, I know the rating of my engine is wrong, its more like 220 HP with over 300 foot pounds of torque, not sure, never had it on a dyno. All books and internet sites rate a olds 1979 350 at 160 HP.
![]()