That truck was also driven cross-country multiple time hauling loads well below what it was rated for. Not exactly apples to apples here.I like the comments about how 625k miles is wonderful. When Toyota tore down the first million mile 4.7L in the 2007 Tundra, they said it had better performance than when new and looked like it barely had any use on it.
What I don't understand is how in nearly every thread on here which brings something positive to a brand/engine that's not Toyota, people feel like it's their obligation to come in and tout how it's not nearly as impressive as what Toyota did/does. I have nothing against Toyota, but it gets extremely tiresome. Toyota isn't paying you- it's okay to not compare other brands to them all of the time. You're not the only one to do this, you're just the latest one.