Actually it is an inappropriate use of the spider chart. You can't use them across approvals or licenses. That's not their purpose.Yes I am aware of that chart, thank you for sending that.
Actually it is an inappropriate use of the spider chart. You can't use them across approvals or licenses. That's not their purpose.Yes I am aware of that chart, thank you for sending that.
I know. However, I'm trying to illustrate the shortcomings of the lubricant he's using versus what's required for his application.Actually it is an inappropriate use of the spider chart. You can't use them across approvals or licenses. That's not their purpose.
Yes I am aware of that chart, thank you for sending that.
View attachment 108639
This is the OAI report of the same sample as the latest BS result.
I am sure there will be some feedback. Have to check on the fuel issue for sure.
As I suspected, fuel is significant at 3%. TBN is also a bit lower. Oxidation isn't as bad I expected it to be, so that's good news. KV100 is consistent with what Blackstone found.View attachment 108639
This is the OAI report of the same sample as the latest BS result.
I am sure there will be some feedback. Have to check on the fuel issue for sure.
I think you're spot-on. If @KEVINK0000 can provide a VOA for the oil he used, then maybe we can draw some meaningful conclusions, and this experiment might be salvageable after all.This is where a VOA would have been helpful, so we knew what virgin visc and oxidation were to see how far they've moved.
Mobil 1 FS 0W-40 is much better motor oil than Quaker State 5W-30. It has much better natural solubility than the Quaker State. For one, it uses ANs and Esters to keep your seals intact and your engine clean.Another UOA recently posted of same engine, which is still on original chain, apparently.
I would use ll-01, as it has N20 timing chain test. Castrol 5w40, Valvoline 5w40, etc. OP, I know UOAs are meaningless, but a UOA with an ll-01 oil would be interesting. Would it mean anything? NoMobil 1 FS 0W-40 is much better motor oil than Quaker State 5W-30. It has much better natural solubility than the Quaker State. For one, it uses ANs and Esters to keep your seals intact and your engine clean.
Look, disregard all my comments because all I'm trying to do is show you that you're doing this wrong. Instead, get some SAE40 Engine Cleaner from HPL and run it for one OCI with Mobil 1 FS 0W-40 or 5W-40. Then keep running one of these two Mobil 1 oils. I've run both in my wife's fuel-diluting 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe GDI 3.3L V6, and the 5W-40 usually came out dirtier and thicker than the 0W-40, but both left a clean engine behind. The N20 runs hot and will fuel dilute no matter what. So the best thing you can do for that engine is run the best motor oil you can afford. Fortunately, Mobil 1 FS 0W-40 and 5W-40 are both available and excellent products. Neither carries the Longlife-01 approval. However, both are Full SAPS ACEA A3/B4 lubes that carry approvals in the same class as BMW Longlife-01. Of course, there is always QS 5W-40, but you may have to order it online. Oh, and there is PP Euro 0W-40 available for a reasonable $24.99 at Walmart.com. The bottom line is that running better oil will give your engine a buffer for when the oil is fuel-diluted and ran hot, thereby prolonging that engine's life and allowing your son to enjoy that vehicle for a longer period.
Mobil 1 FS 0W-40 used to carry Longlife-01 approval. The reason why it no longer has it has everything to do with lubricant politics and nothing to do with the oils capability. Of course, the choices you listed are absolutely valid and good oils. I have a slight bias towards Mobil 1.I would use ll-01, as it has N20 timing chain test. Castrol 5w40, Valvoline 5w40, etc. OP, I know UOAs are meaningless, but a UOA with an ll-01 oil would be interesting. Would it mean anything? No
Nothing wrong with M1, but it’s really high saps. Might not be the best for turbo direction injection. Edyvw will probably have a better answer or recommendationMobil 1 FS 0W-40 used to carry Longlife-01 approval. The reason why it no longer has it has everything to do with lubricant politics and nothing to do with the oils capability. Of course, the choices you listed are absolutely valid and good oils. I have a slight bias towards Mobil 1.
What immediately stands out is Calcium and Boron. Boron on this VOA is at 108. On your three UOA's it's ~30, all of them. Calcium is >1,400 on this VOA, while yours are all ~1,300ppm. Not huge differences but enough to raise an eyebrow..View attachment 108691 Found this elsewhere on BITOG. Same oil VOA according to poster.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/quaker-state-5w30-sp.352111/page-2
Higher AW additives, and even more fuel than yours, lol, which has a pretty decent hit on viscosity.Another UOA recently posted of same engine, which is still on original chain, apparently. View attachment 108694
Full SAPS actually does a pretty good job preventing LSPI because ZDDP acts as a mitigator. When ZDDP levels are reduced, then you have to reduce calcium, because calcium promotes LSPI, and that's what has led to these different formulations with magnesium replacing calcium.Nothing wrong with M1, but it’s really high saps. Might not be the best for turbo direction injection. Edyvw will probably have a better answer or recommendation
To aleviate all concerns, and going strictly by approvals and API SN Plus/SP licensing, the Quaker State Euro 5W-40 would be the top pick for the OP's application. It's an LSPI friendly formulation that carries thd LL-01 approval, has a decent amount of ZDDP and a nearly 50/50 Magnezium/Calcium package.Nothing wrong with M1, but it’s really high saps. Might not be the best for turbo direction injection. Edyvw will probably have a better answer or recommendation