Would you buy a hybrid?

I admit, I am not very knowledgeable about hybrids ( who makes the best ) , but my bias would be to buy Toyota if I was looking for one.

I don’t get rid ( I used to when young, foolish, and made a lot less money ) if JT cars, I keep them as long as I can. I don’t worry about resale value but it’s a smart thing to consider for those who might not keep it.
Yeah get a Toyota. Hyundai is hit or miss.
 
Asian Hybrids lose value faster than almost anything, the only thing that drops value faster than an Asian hybrid is probably a teala.
I say buy a lease turn in. At 3 years old a hybrid lease turn in is close to the same price of a 3 year old gas powered car.
If your Hyundai and KIA maybe. Toyota, Honda and Ford Hybrids hold there value well.
 
Nope. Pure ICE or Pure EV for me.

Messy packaging/complexity. Even some brand new Toyota Hybrids are a packaging disaster. Huge compromises in interior space.
Interesting perspective. To me the hybrid seems like the best of both worlds. I don't own one yet but a plugin or regular hybrid probably will be my next vehicle. I have zero interest in pure EV but have no objections to others owning them.
 
Interesting perspective. To me the hybrid seems like the best of both worlds. I don't own one yet but a plugin or regular hybrid probably will be my next vehicle. I have zero interest in pure EV but have no objections to others owning them.
Hybrid is like having both complexities to save a couple MPG. Like one of those old tv/dvd player combos. One half always failed first.
 
I wasn’t aware hybrids had more problems other than models made by companies that also have problems with regular ICE models.
There's just more possibilities to go wrong and if the electric side of things goes wrong some cars don't allow the ICE to work on its own as a backup. It doesn't mean that it's going to be unreliable.
 
In theory, the cost difference is fairly minimal. But when the market is discounting the gas version significantly and charging MSRP on the hybrid model, the delta can be quite significant.
True, and allocation plays a big part. Demand outstrips supply. Toyota and the others need to listen to their dealerships.
 
Hybrid is like having both complexities to save a couple MPG. Like one of those old tv/dvd player combos. One half always failed first.

Fwiw, genuine Honda extended warranties (max 8 yrs/120k) prices for CRV hybrids vs ICE are similar, with the hybrids slightly more expensive. So Honda doesn’t see the complexity as an issue in that time frame.
 
We like ours. I normally kill my wife in MPG in daily driving. (in our truck she averages 13-15mpg, and I easily get 20-22) In our hybrid if I am careful, I can eek out 39 mpg. She can race around town like a crazy person and still easily get 35 mpg.
 
I can't see a vehicle being less reliable just because it's more complex ( hybrid/ICE powertrain ).

If an unreliable hybrid system is mated with an unreliable ICE, I could understand that complexity resulting in less reliability but not if both are well designed.

A320 CFM 56 Jet engine is very complex, but it's also very reliable.

So far, I have only had one issue and they have always started.

I am just throwing this out there, I enjoy the discussion.
 
While I can see the benefit for the new car purchaser, I think we can take it as a given that the battery isn't going to last the life of the vehicle and therefore it going to be a very bad purchase for some used buyer down the line where the improved mpg does not begin to compensate for the battery replacement cost. I was reading that even mild hybrids have a 48V battery as the starter battery and that can also cost $3000 to replace. The car manufacturers haven't the slightest interest in making hybrid batteries simple and cheap to replace and for the likes of Mercedes it can be $10,000.

I'm actually looking to replace my car soon and as a low annual mile user I'm not that bothered about the last few MPG but I am concerned about simplicity and maintenance costs so hybrids and in particular a Mercedes hybrid is ruled out for me.
I'm not sure why some folks repeat the old saw about the battery. I'm on my third hybrid, all Fords. The first two were firstyear 2005 Escape and the second 2011. I like most people enjoy the features of a newer car which is the only reason I kept updating, to my current Maverick. The battery is the least of the problems, as borne out by the New York taxis which were using first/second gen Escapes for upwards of 400K miles without major mechanical problems. Also with the original battery. And, with regard to street use, while they won't outrun a Tesla they are surprising adept with the momentary add-on grunt the battery offers when attempting a quick passing maneuver.
 
I can't see a vehicle being less reliable just because it's more complex ( hybrid/ICE powertrain ).

If an unreliable hybrid system is mated with an unreliable ICE, I could understand that complexity resulting in less reliability but not if both are well designed.

A320 CFM 56 Jet engine is very complex, but it's also very reliable.

So far, I have only had one issue and they have always started.

I am just throwing this out there, I enjoy the discussion.
Apples and oranges comparison. Commercial jet vs consumer car.

The original Toyota hybrids were ultra reliable. They were trying to prove a concept. I believe since everything has been about cost reduction. That’s typical for all consumer products.

By definition the more systems the more possibility of failure. Not that it couldn’t be designed to last forever - but the cost wouldn’t be conducive to maximum profit nor consumer budgets.

Obviously varies by model and only time will tell.
 
Apples and oranges comparison. Commercial jet vs consumer car.

The original Toyota hybrids were ultra reliable. They were trying to prove a concept. I believe since everything has been about cost reduction. That’s typical for all consumer products.

By definition the more systems the more possibility of failure. Not that it couldn’t be designed to last forever - but the cost wouldn’t be conducive to maximum profit nor consumer budgets.

Obviously varies by model and only time will tell.
So, hybrid technology is possible to be just as reliable unless they don't care about reliability as much as before.

If cost cutting is the reason, wouldn't that logic apply to their ICE line up as well?

Not an expert with Toyota, but I wonder if they are aware the main reason anyone I know who is brand loyal is because they feel they are more reliable.

I haven't looked up the reliability ratings of Toyota hybrids but will later tonight and chime back in.

Boeing proved even aircraft manufacturers can cut corners to save $

I don't take jet engine reliability for granted, look at all the problems ( we have several A220 long term grounded due to engine problems ) with some of the latest, complex jet engines.
 
So far none of the posts dealt with the cost and gas mileage of a hybrid model vs the cost and gas mileage of same model in a non hybrid version. Would anyone like to offer that up? The auto makers don’t want you to pay close attention to that.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47339&id=47343&id=47344

Note: You can personalize the price of fuel and miles driven per year.

Now go pull two new cars for sale in identical trim with one being a hybrid and compare.
 
Back
Top Bottom