Let me simply state that no fastener on which I have used a TW has been stripped, broken, or has come loose.
That cannot be said of many of all the rest.
That cannot be said of many of all the rest.
Stu_Rock said:you are still more likely to be consistent with a torque wrench than without. More directly, I contend that the last sentence in your post is almost certainly provably incorrect.
I think that Bickford has, in fact, proven to the contrary, at least to my satisfaction. I'd urge you to read the full text sometime when you're really bored, and make your own determination--no need to take my word for it.
OK, when I get a chance, I will walk over to the engineering library and take a look, as well as the reference in the table you cite. Amazon preview does at least show most of the chapter. I agree that clicker wrenches aren't that great, and that angle torque is pretty good. I don't trust Bickford's operator feel "measurement," which is as much of a contention as mine is. I don't think his value would stand up to testing. (What? questioning an expert? Yes, as an academic scientist I reserve the right to do that). Also, Bickford does not present "methodology" in that book chapter, which is basically a review paper. That is not the type of document where "proof" is found.
Originally Posted By: JOD
For a joint that is really tension-critical, like head gaskets (as you mentioned), that's why manufacturers typically include angle torque specs, or utilize TTY bolts. Why? Because it's much more accurate.
Agreed, though I had in mind more compliant gaskets with regular bolts, not cylinder heads.