Why Do Knowledgeable Folks on Here use 20 wt Oil

Status
Not open for further replies.
So you have no idea what engine they're from, what oil was used, how many miles on them, or the use case... But are sure that thicker oil would have prevented it. 🤦‍♂️
Did you even read my post? I made it 110% clear I was using the photo to show what upper rod bearing wear looks like. Sometimes I really wonder why anyone including myself share experiences here….
 
I guess I need to explain my post better. Sometimes when dissembling an engine for inspection you will find wear on the upper rod bearing halves(like shown below) and no wear at all on the bottom half. What causes this is during TDC of the power stroke energy travels down the connecting rod to the crank. This squeezes the oil “cushion” between the crank journal and upper rod bearing half. If oil temperatures get to hot and viscosity is to low this cushion could go to zero causing friction and wear. This is common during severe service like racing, towing, plowing etc. and one reason why some manufacturers recommended a higher viscosity in severe service. Something like oil starvation usually causes wear to upper and lower rod bearings.

79803CEC-3AA3-46E5-A87F-ECB3AE4D1267.webp
 
Last edited:
I guess I need to explain my post better. Sometimes when dissembling an engine for inspection you will find wear on the upper rod bearing halves(like shown below) and no wear at all on the bottom half. What causes this is during TDC of the power stroke energy travels down the connecting rod to the crank. This squeezes the oil “cushion” between the crank journal and upper rod bearing half. If oil temperatures get to hot and viscosity is to low this cushion could go to zero causing friction and wear. This is common during severe service like racing, towing, plowing etc. and the reason why some manufacturers recommended a higher viscosity in severe service. Something like oil starvation usually causes wear to upper and lower rod bearings.

View attachment 266546
Eveyrtime I see your posts/, I think of this picture from a trip out to CA a while ago. Unrleated but whatever.
20190913_123622.webp
 
Last edited:
I guess I need to explain my post better. Sometimes when dissembling an engine for inspection you will find wear on the upper rod bearing halves(like shown below) and no wear at all on the bottom half. What causes this is during TDC of the power stroke energy travels down the connecting rod to the crank. This squeezes the oil “cushion” between the crank journal and upper rod bearing half. If oil temperatures get to hot and viscosity is to low this cushion could go to zero causing friction and wear. This is common during severe service like racing, towing, plowing etc. and one reason why some manufacturers recommended a higher viscosity in severe service. Something like oil starvation usually causes wear to upper and lower rod bearings.

View attachment 266546
Before I retired - I replaced ring sets on a few dozen high mileage, 3.5 V6 Honda engines.
And a few piston/ring sets on high mileage 2.4K engines.
All due to carbon locked rings - under extended warranty. All used Xw20 oil, the majority were 0w20.
I can report none had upper bearing wear as shown.
But I'm pretty sure none were driven at the track either.
 
Before I retired - I replaced ring sets on a few dozen high mileage, 3.5 V6 Honda engines.
And a few piston/ring sets on high mileage 2.4K engines.
All due to carbon locked rings - under extended warranty. All used Xw20 oil, the majority were 0w20.
I can report none had upper bearing wear as shown.
But I'm pretty sure none were driven at the track either.
Those are great engines, my daughter’s 2016 RDX has one. I use 0w30 and it’s never burned a drop of oil, knock on wood.
 
Those are great engines, my daughter’s 2016 RDX has one. I use 0w30 and it’s never burned a drop of oil, knock on wood.
Yes it is - the ring sticking problem was something that I never saw a clear reason for.
Obviously the VCM shutting down the cylinders was the main culprit - but so many never had a problem.
The K motor rings sticking were much more rare.
I've always thought (conjectured) it was a combination of bare minimum maintenance, and Starvin' Marvin fuel.
 
Yes it is - the ring sticking problem was something that I never saw a clear reason for.
Obviously the VCM shutting down the cylinders was the main culprit - but so many never had a problem.
The K motor rings sticking were much more rare.
I've always thought (conjectured) it was a combination of bare minimum maintenance, and Starvin' Marvin fuel.
Low tension piston rings and longer OCI’s
 
What is this 3 factor bearing graph that you speak of like its eveyday knowledge? Is it the 3 ball Amsoil test that proves nothing in the real world?
image

The Y axis represents friction. The X axis represents N x v/L which is the "Bearing characteristic number" The transition is > .0000017.
v= viscosity N= rpm L= Load
Numbers under .0000017 are unstable and lead to mixed and thin film lubrication. With lower viscosity there is less cushion when loads increase like when shifting or hard acceleration. To me its just common sense.
 
Low tension piston rings and longer OCI’s
That's a contributing factor, but there's more to it than that.
Cylinders 5 and 6 rings never seize - because they never turn off - and cool off.
Plus so many of these engines never have the problem, on any cylinder.
There's some combination of maintenance, driving habits, PCM programming, and possibly the fuel used, that causes the lower tension rings to bind.
Never saw an explanation as to why the pistons are also replaced on the 2.4 engines.
There was no obvious difference.
No explanation of any cause is given in the bulletins - just a procedure.
 
Did you even read my post? I made it 110% clear I was using the photo to show what upper rod bearing wear looks like. Sometimes I really wonder why anyone including myself share experiences here….
There was a time in my life when I thought I could assemble and install a small or big block Chev blindfolded.
Without getting too high on my own supply, the answer is yes.
 
There was a time in my life when I thought I could assemble and install a small or big block Chev blindfolded.
Without getting too high on my own supply, the answer is yes.
I know the feeling!! Then you of all people know what it’s like to pull a SBC pan to inspect rod bearings. Never pull just the cap, inspect the upper half too. Also I have no doubt you could do it blindfolded. I never mentioned the engine but you knew!
 
Especially that upper one !
Right. The upper rod bearing is the loaded one and sensitive to over loading from detonation, high boost or bringing in the NOS at low rpm without enough camshaft to bleed off torque.
The bottom rod bearing is sensitive to rpm and is highly loaded when the piston reverses direction at tdc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4WD
If only that were the case. Singular uncontrolled UOA aren’t nearly as useful as many imagine them to be.
There's a ton of multi run analysis threads and even ones comparing 30 and 20 in the same engine.

Here's two I found in 1 minute:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom