Where have all the piston singles gone...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
5,293
10 years ago on a clear cool Saturday like today, the sky around my house would have been abuzz with the drone of Lycomings and Continentals with Cessna, Piper, or Beech airframes attached to them. But not for awhile. All quiet. Suppose $6/gal 100LL probably partially responsible along with the tanked economy. Sad.
 
Yup. the economy mostly. owning a plane is very expensive even before you fire up the engine. my brother ran a flight school for a few years and had little problem finding new students... until the crash
 
As a Cessna owner, and with my local fuel hovering around $7/gal, I'm not doing much flying. That's just stupid expensive.

When Avgas was $2/gal, way back in the 80's, it was expensive and we complained. However, it was affordable for those with nice income. Today, my single engine Cessna 177 costs nearly $400 to fill up! There is nothing affordable about that. A cross country trip to my remote property could cost $1000. Sorry, that just ain't happenen'.

By the way, my "top off" price increase is $215 over 3 years here! That's more than double.

Put another way, those who could afford to feed a twin 3 years ago, can now only afford to feed a single...
 
Last edited:
Seems the end of an Era. Private ownership of small planes used to be a little slice of American culture. The Golden Age of general aviation seems over with. This really bums me out. I had hoped there would be a transition to aero-diesel engines for small GA aircraft... piston aviation engines that burn Jet A, and this would be the fix for the high cost of 100LL but Jet A is no less expensive and the aero-diesel concept doesn't seem to have gathered much momentum. Once upon a time I had a Pa-28. I got out of it quite awhile ago, for a few reasons, and stopped flying. That airplane has since been destroyed by a tornado at the field where the new owner hangared it. I dream of owning again and getting back into flying now that my life situation is more suitable to it, but Sweet Jesus the cost of the game has gone up a lot and not just fuel, annuals, parts, insurance, everything. Hangar rent at our airport is up 50% from when I used to pay it. Sitting here on a CAVU Sunday, winds light, there is a deafening silence in the skies. I fear what the silence is saying.
 
That's a good sign. I hope the trend spreads. A local flight school has a Robinson R22 but I never see it flying anymore.
 
The Robinsons are almost comical. They make a lot of noise but you see them barely moving along. When turbine powered helos are making that much noise they are really moving.
 
Ah yes, true. But they cost much less to acquire and to operate than a turbine ship, hence their popularity with flight schools. The R44 is gaining popularity with news channels and law enforcement. Robinson sells specific versions of the R44 outfitted for each of those two mission types. If memory serves, the R44 uses a Lycoming IO-540.
 
Checked on the price of AvGas today.

Lady told me that it's $2 (Oz) even per litre at the moment. $8 US per US Gal...and aviation fuels don't have road taxes.
 
I'm a licensed pilot and used to fly every chance I got. With the price of avgas at 6 bucks per gallon or more in this area, it's taken the fun out of flying.
 
I'm kicking around the idea of a homebuilt, utilizing something like the 4 gph 100 hp Rotax engine that burns auto gas, or the Australian six cylinder Jabiru which I think also burns auto fuel. But then most experimentals using those mills tend to be only good as VFR local region toys and not decent XC aircraft, except maybe the Europa. But granted, I don't know a lot about homebuilt/experimentals. Maybe there are better cross country (XC) choices among homebuilts.
 
Check out EAA's "Sport Aviation".
You'll be amazed at the variety and diversity available in homebuilt aircraft.
Everything from mogas sipping fair weather fun fliers to seriously fast cross country machines.
Even turbines and helos.
It's all a matter of what you want to spend and what you want to do.
The old Rutan Varieze offered great performance on very little power, for example, and was not expensive to build, although it was labor intensive. I see a couple flying around here on nice days.
The unconventional configuration makes them easy to recognize.
Van's RVs are all metal aircraft that offer good performance and are said to have exellent feel in flight. There are fast build kits available to lower the labor required to build one, as well, to give another example.
There are so many more.
If you think you might want to build an aircraft, your best bet would be to hook up with the nearest EAA chapter. There you can learn whether this would be a good route for you to airplane ownership.
 
Originally Posted By: LoneRanger
Seems the end of an Era. .......but Sweet Jesus the cost of the game has gone up a lot and not just fuel, annuals, parts, insurance, everything. Hangar rent at our airport is up 50% from when I used to pay it. Sitting here on a CAVU Sunday, winds light, there is a deafening silence in the skies. I fear what the silence is saying.



Originally Posted By: 46Harry
I'm a licensed pilot and used to fly every chance I got. With the price of avgas at 6 bucks per gallon or more in this area, it's taken the fun out of flying.


++1
 
Originally Posted By: tom slick
The Robinsons are almost comical. They make a lot of noise but you see them barely moving along. When turbine powered helos are making that much noise they are really moving.


The R44 cruise speed is about the same as a Bell Jet Ranger. . .The R22 isn't much slower. Most pilot's don't fly helicopters at max cruise speed because the vibrations increase and the rides gets "lumpier".
 
Klaus savier (sp) produces an electronic ignition for experimentals. He is able to achieve incredible speed and MPG from his vari-eze. his engine is a modernized and modified contential o-200.

I like the Idea of such aircraft. However such small toys are not practical for families.
 
We've got a Cirrus as a "puddle jumper" single that we use. We also have a larger twin engine'd craft that I can't recall the name of that is used as an actual people mover.

Our airport is actually surprisingly busy for a smaller town.
 
a lot of things happened:

-expensive fuel; probably the biggest immediate reason, although Avgas hasn't risen relatively that much beyond other other fuels. It is a boutique product and requires separate handling, etc. so the price, ugly as it may be, is not unreasonable. Let's see what the 'greenies' law suit to end leaded avgas does though.

-available aircraft; the fleet is aging and good older and especially new aircraft are expensive. Also, aside from the new glass panel birds, how exciting are steam gauges and flimsy plastic interior panels to a target population used to driving 5 series.

-aging/decreasing pilot population; we are just not attracting enough new pilots for a lot of reasons. Cost is a huge reason, but some are cultural. What kid wants to fly? Some do, but not many. ~40 years ago i was 5 flying (trying) a Cox Stuka w/ my Dad, kids played w/ gliders, the space program was in full swing, nightly TV news had Phantoms & Skyhawks doing what they were built to do (keeping apolitical here)...kids wanted to fly. Now they play video games which are pretty darn entertaining and a lot easier than earning a PPL.

As far as attracting adults, tough also, look at what you have to compete against for their tome and money. Also, the target demographic, professionals, small business owners, etc. probably work more hours than 30-40 years ago.

General Aviation flying will continue, but short of a marketing miracle or another dot.com boom it will be more of a niche hobby than it is now. Piper will sell its 100 planes a year, Beechcraft (Bonanza
20.gif
), Cirrus and Cessna more and the expirimental and Warbird folks will remain active, but the heydays are behind us.
 
It's my opinion that light aircraft have always had to compete with the automobile. Unfortunately, the cost relationship is vastly different than it used to be.

Case in point. Technam is producing a modern version of my Cessna 177. (same engine too) The price is more than 10 times the cost of a quality sedan. (and that's the unequipped price! )

Fast forward to 40 years ago, the general aviation "heyday". Really nice aircraft were available for $10,000-$15,000. The average new car price was $4,034. Gas was 36 cents per gallon.

Using that same ratio, new 4 seat aircraft should be $50K-$75K today. But, we all know that's not the case.

Bottom line: Light aircraft have become un-afordable to all but those with good income and a willingness to part with it for minimal return.

But, worse than that, light aircraft have become impractical, due simply to skyrocketing cost per mile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom