2011 Equinox V6 7 month review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
11,196
Location
NY Capital District
Edit: This is not in response to hokies CR-V thread, I didn't even see it till after I posted this :3

For the second time, because my back button decided to kill an hours worth of typing in one fell swoop (ALLOFMYRAGE).


Sooooooo... For the second time today.


We took delivery of our 2011 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ V6 on June 30th, 2011. It stickers at just over $38k and has every single option available. Most everything I say in this review applies equally/almost equally to the GMC Terrain. We currently have 7,260 miles on the clock.

Pros: Smooth, Comfortable and quiet ride, Gutsy V6, Cavernous Backseat, high quality interior

Cons: Numb Steering, Average fuel economy, medioce handling, turning circle.

Trips to dealer since purchased: None

Fuel Economy: Overall Average: 17.1mpg, best tank: 25.4mpg overall highway: 24.5mpg

Final Vehicle Assembly: Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada
Engine: St. Catharines, ON, CA
Transmission: Silao, Mexico
US/Canada Parts Content: 66%

Interior/Ride: This is where the equinox shines, so this is where I will start. The interior is well designed. We got simple black, but it is available in several two-toned interior colors which look fantastic. The materials feel high quality, most of it is plastic, which is par for the segment. But the plastics have a high quality feel to them, and a lot of them are partially soft-touch. It is attractively designed. The Gauge cluster is readable, and the DIC is useful.


Front seat comfort is good, the driver seat is adjustable in front/back, height, tilt, and recline, all power. There is a wide range of adjustment to fit most drivers, and will comfortably accommodate both tall, and shorter people. The steering wheel offers a good range of adjustment in tilt and telescope as well, finding a comfortable driving position is easy. The passenger seat offers slide/recline manual adjustability, and offers a generous range of adjustment as well. Headroom is ample, even with the moonroof.

The backseat though is where it gets really impressive. The amount of space back there makes it feel cavernous. At 5' 11” tall I can easily stretch out nicely, even with a normal height person in the seat in front of you. The middle passenger isn't punished either. Seats are comfortable, though the middle seat is a bit harder, as you'd expect. Headroom is excellent as well, really impressive. Hip room is a litlte tight with 3 adults in the back, but the leg and headroom make it bearable.

The equinox is a bit on the low side for cargo storage, but it isn't tiny. If you fold down the rear seats (which don't fold fully flat) you get a lot of storage room for larger items like desks, tires & rims, or whatever.

The rear seat entertainment system is excellent, with two fairly large flip down TVs, one built into the back of each front seat. It offers a DVD player, and A/V inputs in the back. It comes with two sets of wireless headphones, and a remote control. When the vehicle is stopped, whatever is playing can be displayed on the front nav display as well. The rear seat passengers can be doing different things as well. If one person wants to play the PS2 on their TV, but the other person wants to watch garfield on DVD, that is easily done. The dual channel headphones make this possible. This is an excellent feature for families that take lots of road trips, sadly though it was removed as an option for the 2012 Model Year for reasons I cannot understand.

The Navigation system itself is functional and mostly easy to use. Navigation works well, and includes full maps of Canada, and the USA. Finding desinations is easy, and the navigation itself works well, it beeps when you are at the intersection you need to turn at, eliminating the “Is this it!?” that accompanies some other systems, and standalone GPS units. The ipod/radio/CD interface is well layed out and easy to use. This screen also displays the backup camera when in reverse. It can be controlled either via touchscreen, scrolling kob, or with a directional pad on the console, or change tracks/volume/source via buttons on the steering wheel. Voice control for bluetooth phones works well, and consistently.



Onto the ride and handling. The Ride is quiet. I mean, really quiet. It makes the CR-V sound like a tin-can in terms of road-noise and wind noise. Over decent, and smooth roads, the ride is smooth, composed, and it feels well planted. Steering on the other hand, is rather numb, and in my opinion, needlessly heavy, compared to the EPS in the 4 cylinder version, and the excellent EPS in the cruze. Handling itself is what I would call competent, but not fun. You can tackle twisty mountain roads, and be relatively assured that the tires will stay planted on the road. But it's not nearly as nimble or fun as the CR-V is. It's planted, but doesn't inspire a ton of confidence. In other words, the Equinox is designed to be a comfortable highway cruiser, not a nimble mountain goat. This could be due to it's height and weight, or suspension tuning, likely a combination of both. Either way like I said, it's competent, but I wouldn't call it fun. On the highway however, it's completely stable, planted. This is a car designed to haul families cross country and back in comfort.

This leads me in to the other big drawback. The turning circle. With 17/18” rims the turning radius is already fairly large, at I believe 37-38 feet. But with the 19” rims that our particular model came with, it is increased to just over 40 feet. That is a very large turning circle, and it's taken some getting used to, a little more planning when parking in a crowded parking lot. When we wer ein ohio for thanksgiving, and my mom drove my grandfathers escape, she commented on it, that the turning radius is definitely smaller. Heck, our expedition had a turning circle about 3 feet smaller than the equinox does. So be aware of this, it's not a deal breaker to us, but it is something worth noting. Go for the 18” rims, the better turning circle and lower cost is worth it just for that.


Powertrain: If you test drive one, the 4 cylinder and V6 aren't directly comparable. The V6 doesn't feel too much faster than the 4 cylinder right off the lot. A few thousand miles later, after it's broken in however, and the difference is like night and day. The 3.0L is the new Direct-Injeted, DOHC, VVT equipped GM HFV6, a smaller version of the excellent 3.6L people are already familiar with. It makes 264HP, and 222lb/ft of torque. But there is something I left out here. This is not your old big block, or 3800 series V6. This engine feels more like a Honda. What I mean is that 264HP comes on at 6,950RPM, and the torque at just over 5,000RPM. The engine isn't a complete dog in the lower rev ranges, but if you want punch, you have to put your foot down to get it. But when you do, it's actually pretty darn impressive. Once it hits it's powerband betwewen 4,000 and 4,500RPM, it will push you back in your seat, and if you aren't careful, spin the front tires, despite the TC and AWD. I've spun the tires a few tims when I put my foot down going 40MPH, when the transmission downshifts perfectly. This is definitely more like a Honda Engine, than the old GM V6s. This thing loves to rev, and will reward you for doing so. Once it hits the powerband it will pull all the way to the redline at 7,100RPM. It will upshift quickly, smoothly, and firmly, and do it all over again. The engine and 6 speed automatic are perfectly matched, and in perfect sync with each other. The power comes on higher in the rev range, but when it does, watch out! But at the same time, it's also extremely smooth, and refined.

I've said it before, but it makes the 3.0L duratec sound and feel rough, and unrefined in both sound and feel. This engine transmits no vibration to the cabin, and it sounds quite nice when revving. It's probably the best V6 engine I've ever experienced.

And it's no exaggeration when saying that this transmission is probably one of the best I've ever experienced as well. It's extremely smooth, the gears are well spaced, and the programming is spot on. Seriously, it's always in the gear I want it to be in, it downshifts exactly when I want it to, and it upshifts when I want it to, no hunting about, and no frustration when it wont' drop a few cogs when I prod the go pedal. It shifts smoothly, timely and firmly. I'm a huge fan of this transmission.

The powertrain overall is very smooth and refined, and matches the rest of the vehicle in that regard. I have to say well done to GM on this powertrain, because it's world class.

The 4 cylinder has about the same feel at low rev ranges, but there is no comparison once you hit the V6 powerband, it ha 100 more horsepower, and you definitely can't miss it. It does have a learning program, so it takes a few thousand miles before it really feels different than the 4 cylinder though.

Fuel Economy: It's used mostly for short trips around town and for my mom's commute. It averages 16-17mpg in that usage. Highway driving, our last two trips it achieved 24 and 25mpg respectively, both going 75mph, which isn't that bad considering it's weight, height, and the AWD coupled to a V6 engine.



Other features: The power liftgate. This is not something we went in asking for, it's just something it happens to have. And my god, 7 months later we appreciate it. It really is useful. Especially because the opener knob on the roof in the driver seat has a knob to adjust Full opening, and ¾ opening, for people who have lower garages.

The projector headlights are phenomenal, especially on high beams, they put out a LOT of light.

Backup camera: It works, and it works well, what else is there to say?


What it's for: People who want a comfortable highway cruiser to haul people in comfort
What it isn't for: people who want a nimble, lightfooted crossover (See CR-V).

Addendum: The 18" rims also get you Michelin Latitute Tour tires, versus the Hankook Optimo H725 that the 19" rims get you. those are smoother, and much quieter than the Hankooks, not to mention have better overall traction.

The engine is turning about 2,250RPM at 75mph, and climbing hills, it will keep the TCC locked, and downshift to 5th, engine speed climbing to 2,900RPM or so.
 
Last edited:
I understand what you are saying about the V-6 engine, even tho I haven't driven an Equinox - the Duratec is a somewhat rough-idling engine, with power much, much lower in the rev-range. I rarely ever have mine above 4k rpm.

In reading your review, I learned a lot - I didn't realize just what a 'revver' the new GM V-6 was - powerband and redline are WAY higher than I thought they would be!

Thanks for sharing!
 
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far. Not one trip to the dealer except required state inspections. My review would be nearly the same as yours, except I don't have any issue with the turning radius. Maybe because I have the 17" wheels. My fuel mileage is averaging about 24 mpg in 50/50 city highway mix.

I had a rattle that was driving me crazy for about 3 months. Couldn't find it. Started taking thinks out of the car and leaving them on the workbench. Finally found it today. A box of TICTACS in the center console bin!
Love the cartridge filter. I can do an oil change in about 15 minutes with little mess.

Nice review by the way.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Nick R
This is not your old big block, or 3800 series V6. This engine feels more like a Honda. What I mean is that 264HP comes on at 6,950RPM, and the torque at just over 5,000RPM. The engine isn't a complete dog in the lower rev ranges, but if you want punch, you have to put your foot down to get it. But when you do, it's actually pretty darn impressive. Once it hits it's powerband betwewen 4,000 and 4,500RPM, it will push you back in your seat, and if you aren't careful, spin the front tires, despite the TC and AWD. I've spun the tires a few tims when I put my foot down going 40MPH, when the transmission downshifts perfectly. This is definitely more like a Honda Engine, than the old GM V6s. This thing loves to rev, and will reward you for doing so.


I have really come to like high-revving engines. I grew up on old school. I remember swearing I'd never own anything with overhead cams. I loved my pushrods, thank you very much.

But there's just something about an engine that pulls harder and harder as it reaches 6000 or 7000 rpm that's become real compelling to me. And the refinement of modern engines like this is great. They make good mechanical noises, and are eager and willing to rev as high as you want them to rev.

My brother's Cadillac CTS has the same engine as your Equinox I think...it's the 3.0L HF V-6. It's not fast on paper in absolute terms, but the engine makes wonderful noises to keep you entertained.
 
Great review. I didn't know the engine liked to wind out that much. Seems like I see alot of them on the road around here. Tom
 
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.
 
Originally Posted By: dwcopple
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.


If it was a 2011 I know what the issue probably was. The 2011s had a weird issue with the cam phasers on the 2.4L Model. Neither the 2010 nor the 2012s have that problem. That or she had a completely defective model. There has been no engine drone on the highway on either the 3.0L or the 2.4Ls I've driven.
 
Excellent write up. I have a Terrain and I would agree with everything you said. Mine has also been very solid with no issues in the 14 months I have owned it. I am very happy with it!
 
Interesting to note the engine powerband being so far up. That would be a major drawback for me in a vehicle in this segment. I'm a much bigger proponent of engines with even power delivery, especially under 2000 RPM. I can't stand our Honda V6.


Thanks for the review.
 
Originally Posted By: Nick R
Originally Posted By: dwcopple
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.


If it was a 2011 I know what the issue probably was. The 2011s had a weird issue with the cam phasers on the 2.4L Model. Neither the 2010 nor the 2012s have that problem. That or she had a completely defective model. There has been no engine drone on the highway on either the 3.0L or the 2.4Ls I've driven.


No engine drone on the highway. Barely notice the engine noise unless under hard acceleration.
 
Originally Posted By: cchase
Interesting to note the engine powerband being so far up. That would be a major drawback for me in a vehicle in this segment. I'm a much bigger proponent of engines with even power delivery, especially under 2000 RPM. I can't stand our Honda V6.


Thanks for the review.


I agree, the power band is a drawback.
But, nonetheless great review!

My RX300 delivers 80% of it's torque at 1800 rpm.
 
Originally Posted By: hypervish
Originally Posted By: cchase
Interesting to note the engine powerband being so far up. That would be a major drawback for me in a vehicle in this segment. I'm a much bigger proponent of engines with even power delivery, especially under 2000 RPM. I can't stand our Honda V6.


Thanks for the review.


I agree, the power band is a drawback.
But, nonetheless great review!

My RX300 delivers 80% of it's torque at 1800 rpm.


Don't get me wrong, it has plenty of power down low to get around, we rarely go over 3,000RPM in everyday driving. But if you want poooooowwwwwweeeeerrrrrr, as clarkson says, then you have to go a bit higher than that to find it.
 
Originally Posted By: dwcopple
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.


The shop I go to said they've heard quite a few issues with timing chain/belt (what ever is on there) on the current generation Equinox. Not sure if it was the V6 or 4-cylinder. They brought it up when I was mentioning the timing chain TSB on our Xterra.
 
Originally Posted By: VicVinegar
Originally Posted By: dwcopple
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.


The shop I go to said they've heard quite a few issues with timing chain/belt (what ever is on there) on the current generation Equinox. Not sure if it was the V6 or 4-cylinder. They brought it up when I was mentioning the timing chain TSB on our Xterra.



I haven't heard of any timing chain issues on either the 2.4L or 3.0L, and I keep up with that kind of stuff. The only thing I've heard of is the 2011 2.4Ls had issues with cam phasers and solenoids and severe startup clatter that was fixed by replacing both parts, and performing an ECM update at the same time.
 
Originally Posted By: VicVinegar
Originally Posted By: dwcopple
Originally Posted By: ems1
I have a 2010 Equinox FWD 2.4L. I'm up to 31,000 miles in 2 years. Excellent vehicle so far.
Lady I work with has one that the engine just grenaded in. It is under warranty so they have sent a GM specialist to the dealership to do a full engine teardown and inspection on it. Can't wait to see her paperwork. I rode in it once and the engine drone on the highway was unbearable.


The shop I go to said they've heard quite a few issues with timing chain/belt (what ever is on there) on the current generation Equinox. Not sure if it was the V6 or 4-cylinder. They brought it up when I was mentioning the timing chain TSB on our Xterra.


GM changed the OLM (reduced OCI) on their 3.6 liter DI engine due to lubrication issues with the timing chain (I assume due to the DI oil/fuel issues). I know that the 2011 Equinox 3.0 liter V6 was changed also (probably at the factory). The OLM now has a maximum of 5500 miles for the OCI. My daughter has one and does severe highway driving with 5500 miles as the OLM's OCI. She used to get up to 10,000 miles on her OLM for her Chevy Malibu Maxx V6 engine on the same drives.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with most of the review from NickR. The rest of the review comes with personal ownership in which I don't personaly have. But, my buddy bought an '11 Nox 4 cyl FWD only with me in tow.

This Nox is a great vehicle in which I don't like the outward vision but, the rest of the Nox is very nice and friggin quiet. Better in fact than the other MFG's CUV's that we tested. The Nox feels more grown up compared to what we tested. CR-V, RAV 4, Escape, Subaru Forester and nothing from Chrysler!

When it came to narrowing down the choices of CUV's and driving even more than you can shake a stick at, the Nox came out on top.

Very well equiped with backup camera, roof racks, mud guards, 17" Aluminum Wheels, floor/cargo mats, BlueTooth(3mo FREE *OnStar) and all of the interior features one can get for $27 grand...munus discounts and GM moneys(~$25 g's). You can't go wrong! No Trade In on this purchace; a clean deal! No money down except for a small deposit to show honesty for the purcahce. And he paid cash!

This particular dealership even gives you back money you spent on maintenance at their dealership from your past vehicle, toward the purchace of this vehicle, in which the dealership keeps in an account for the owner.

For $27 grand, this Equinox has more info in the Information Center than my wifes $40 grand '01 Lexus RX! But, of course, the Nox is 10 years newer.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top