What if "low tension ring" theory is all wrong?

Mazda's introductory publicity for the 1981 Mazda GLC (which I had, listed below) bragged about the new low-friction (low tension) rings.
ha, i owned a 1981 GLC. it was one tough car with the lil 4 banger. It did burn oil.
 
less tension = more blowby = more carbon buildup?

i also wonder if thinner oils contribute to the blowby.
I'm pretty certain the thinner oils do contribute to more blowby. especially in higher cylinder pressure turbocharged engines. I used to have a IS250 with the 4gr-FSE which was direct injection ONLY. This engine was so famous for carboning up to top end that Toyota released a TSB on it and was even replacing long blocks in some cases it was so bad.

My car? No carbon and only traces of varnish in the top end. No catch can or other countermeasures, and it was a lease when sold new. Why was my car so much cleaner than others samples of the same car? Well, maybe my use of premium, low volatility oils of heavier-than spec viscosity had something to do with it? Volatility and tendency toward blowby aerosols really do matter in a newer vehicle.
 
Back
Top Bottom