Originally Posted By: hatt
Originally Posted By: Garak
Originally Posted By: HerrStig
Farming with horses isn't going to feed the United States.
I didn't say it would or that we should even try. I stated that if my grandfather could farm solely with horses and go to church every Sunday and get his kids off to school without a car, many of us can run our own little lives without cars, if we really want to do so badly enough, at least those of us who feel most ripped off by pricing.
I'm curious as to why farming with horses wouldn't feed the USA? If you don't have 8 wheel drive tractors or 18 wheelers you'd farm differently. Most grain is used to produce stuff we shouldn't even be eating anyway. Once you stop growing grain for as far as the eye can see in all directions, a simpler way of farming becomes apparent.
I dunno. IIRC a pound of meat takes something like 7 pounds of grain. Slash agriculture by a factor of 7 and you'd get... a huge amount of land just the same. Only now you'd need teams of horses and men to work it--horses don't work for free, any less than the men. [Sorry women, you're free to help too.] So you'd still need a good amount of feed grain.
I'm sure it could be done. Just leave it out in the Midwest, New England is all forested back over now, no need for all that land being planted or cut for fuel. I guess we could bring back wood (or coal?) fired trains to transport that grain (and meat?) to the coasts? [Yeah even New England would get large areas plowed over to make food, no way around that. Bummer about getting fresh veggies in winter though.]
*
In college I biked to school for a year plus. It was actually great, once I got used to it. I still miss those days. But I'm not sure I'd want to get a horse so as to make the trek to the grocery store, pretty sure the upkeep on a horse makes a 50's vintage car look meek.