What are you eating right now?

The widely held belief or rather convenient excuse that a person's metabolism slows naturally down with age because of age is not true. What is true is that as we age many of use become more sedentary which slows our metabolism down. Also with increasing age nutritional requirements change and this should be addressed.

My metabolism has definitely slowed down in the last 10 years or so. I don’t eat any different than I used to to and I’m actually more active than ever (I average 12,000 steps a day and in the summer it’s more like 15-20,000). But I’m stuck in the 190-195 pound range and can’t seem to get below that. When I was in my mid 40s I had no problem maintaining my weight in the 170-175 range. When I was in my 20s and 30s I had no problems maintaining my weight in the 145-150 pound range.
 
My metabolism has definitely slowed down in the last 10 years or so. I don’t eat any different than I used to to and I’m actually more active than ever (I average 12,000 steps a day and in the summer it’s more like 15-20,000). But I’m stuck in the 190-195 pound range and can’t seem to get below that. When I was in my mid 40s I had no problem maintaining my weight in the 170-175 range. When I was in my 20s and 30s I had no problems maintaining my weight in the 145-150 pound range.
But do you strength training consistently 3 times a week
 
My metabolism has definitely slowed down in the last 10 years or so. I don’t eat any different than I used to to and I’m actually more active than ever (I average 12,000 steps a day and in the summer it’s more like 15-20,000). But I’m stuck in the 190-195 pound range and can’t seem to get below that. When I was in my mid 40s I had no problem maintaining my weight in the 170-175 range. When I was in my 20s and 30s I had no problems maintaining my weight in the 145-150 pound range.
Nutritional requirements change with age. Concluding that the metabolism has slowed down because of age is the wrong. As #18Fan says, strength straining is essential. Some cardio also. Half an hour 3 to four days a weeks is kind of minimum. A 5-mile run is more beneficial than a 5-mile walk. 5 miles is 12,0000 steps.
 
Last edited:
Nutritional requirements change with age. Concluding that the metabolism has slowed down because of age is the wrong conclusion.
But my point is that I’m still eating the same amount of calories but yet I’m burning more of them with my increased amount of walking. So that points to a slower metabolism if I’m not losing weight.

Weight gain and loss is directly related to the amount of calories you consume vs the amount you burn.
 
There's more to this than it being fad. Historically speaking, fasts have existed in most or maybe even all cultures so there may be an innate drive to fast on occasion.

There is pretty strong evidence that an occasional prolonged fast, more than a couple of days, and the resulting increased autophagy may have a disease-preventing effect due to increased elimination of abnormal cells.A prolonged fast could be regarded as sort of a biological house cleaning. Another effect is sort of a reset of metabolic functions.

Biologically speaking, prolonged fasting* is not required for good health, and autophagy occurs anyway but as I said, there's pretty good evidence of befits from an occasional fast because it boosts autophagy. In no way would I suggest anybody let themselves go and then try to undo the damage by fasting. That's not how it works.

I would say, if an occasional fast makes you feel good, do it. Many people say they gain mental clarity from prolonged fasting.

I want to be able to surf at 90! ☠️


*Not eating overnight (8-12 hours) is however necessary for almost everyone who wants to maintain an optimized metabolism.
Great post.
 
But my point is that I’m still eating the same amount of calories but yet I’m burning more of them with my increased amount of walking. So that points to a slower metabolism if I’m not losing weight.

Weight gain and loss is directly related to the amount of calories you consume vs the amount you burn.
Actually your last sentence is not factually correct. The correlation is between the TYPE of food you consume more than it is caloric content. Animal fats and proteins are metabolized in the body far different than sugars and carbohydrates.
 
True story my old man 79 years old smokes about 2 packs a day and drinks to boot but one thing he does is strength trains everyday and has all his life and runs circles around others his age who have never lifted a dang thing after 30 years old. I am in believe it's what only keeps him going and is very well.
 
But my point is that I’m still eating the same amount of calories but yet I’m burning more of them with my increased amount of walking. So that points to a slower metabolism if I’m not losing weight.
The more you walk, the more calories you burn. That's what you say, That's how it is. Maybe you are trying to say your are eating the same amount of calories as always but now you need to walk more to keep the weight off? Maybe your muscle-to body-fat ratio has changed. You probably require a higher protein and lower carb diet to maintain your weight.

Weight gain and loss is directly related to the amount of calories you consume vs the amount you burn.
Yes, but. There are so many buts and I have posted about it so many times that I will not do so again. The human metabolism is complex. What you eat, carb, fat, protein, when you eat, and how often you eat it, exercise, what kind, when, massively affects whether you burn burn body fat or mainly blood glucose and whether or not you put on body fat. If your metabolism is in an anabolic state you will have the hardest time losing weight. If you are in a catabolic state, gaining weight will be neigh impossible. Reducing weight management to calories in and out is missing the larger and complex picture and focusing on only one aspect of weight management. Focusing only on calories works okay for people who have zero metabolic problems but even they can benefit from a more refined approach that will have faster and lasting effect.

Look how many people are starving themselves and they still can't lose weight.
 
Good traing today and Good eating to go with it.
20241229_102201.webp
20241229_171558.webp
 
Actually your last sentence is not factually correct. The correlation is between the TYPE of food you consume more than it is caloric content. Animal fats and proteins are metabolized in the body far different than sugars and carbohydrates.
What changes is the signaling pathways that determine what our bodies do with fat, carbs, and protein. There are different signalling pathways. For example, if you eat a carb-rich meal the carbs get converted into blood glucose and the blood glucose gets converted into glycogen which is stored as fuel in the muscles, the liver, and the brain. Our cells feed on glycogen and if there is excess blood glucose, what is our body going to do? The signaling pathway directs the excess blood glucose to be converted into and deposited as body fat. Using blood glucose requires insulin which acts as a growth factor. It triggers body fat stroage and muscle growth People on a lot of insulin find losing weigth very difficult. Bodybuiulders may abuse insulin because it allows them to grow bigger bigger muscles.

Eat a big steak, lots of protein and fat. The protein triggers a much lesser insulin response comapred to carbs and the protein from the meat can more readily be used for building contractile tissue. The fat barely affects insulin levels. Howver, if the fat intake is high and exceeds caloric requiements, nothing deposts body fat faster that excess fat intake.

Why do bodybuilder sand strength athletes eat all the time? They want to maximize new tissue formation. This sis achieved by activating the m-Tor pathway all the ime by eating all day long, and by exercisinbtg hard repeatedly and often almost every day. The risks are CVD, CKD, and an increased risk for cancer from the caloric overloda, the strain on the cardiovacular system and kidneys, and from ebing in an anabolic state most of the time. They are mximizing strength or appearance at the cost of suboptmal longterm healt.

For optimum health one should balance anabolic and catabolic states, basically you stimulate the m-Tor and AMPK pathways in a balanced manner.

What triggers mTor?
carbs, hard exercise
growth factors like insulin
amino acids
mTor triggers cell growth including abnormal cell proliferation
insulin resistance
adipogenesis (creation of new body fat)

Why is mTor beneficial in mderation?*
Tor increases our capacity for cell growth

What triggers AMPK?
insufficient caloric intake (fasting)
ecercise (yes, it goes both ways so never skip exercise!)
Omega-3 fatty acids (fatty cold water fish)
polyphenols (mostly from plant-based food)

Why is AMPK beneficial in moderation?*
AMPK enhances autophagy, and slows or stops cell growth (so you don;t want to trigger AMPK all the time)

I'm all diatribed-out.

*by moderation I mean based on personal goals. Not everyone has the same goal. But one should find a balance between those metabolic processes. Stand naked in front of the mirror (Draw the blasted curtains, @Jdeere562) and you can tell if your metabolic balance is off.
 
Last edited:
Five out of seven days on average my fast is at least 14 hours overnight into the next late morning. Probably why I do not have type 2 diabetes. Im making my own insulin.
Good job. I recommend that approach to anybody who struggles with maintaining weight, or with having difficulty losing weight. It is the most efficient and least difficult approach. Some people get away with not eating 8 hours, some require 16 hours. This method has to be be combined with appropriate caloric intake and a reasonable nutritional profile and ideally should be supplemented with some exercise. When I tell people to not eat for a few hours before going to bed and to skip breakfast I get a lot of resistance, though. Bad habits are hard to overcome as is is the three-meals-a day routine that most of us learn as children and maintain as adults.
 
You live in LA (area). You have access to a lot more foods than I do.

Buy the -2024 (25?) Milk Street Cookbook. Really easy, everything in the book.


You are absolutely right, Monsieur Pablo, and that is just one of the reasons why I love you. But you are putting me in the awkward position of having to admit that what I eat is crap, not because I am stupid, but because my paycheck is stupid. Stupid inadequate.

EDIT: By the way, I love your oysters. That last time I was in Washington, I ate oysters morning, noon and night. I ate oysters in Seattle. I ate oysters in Bellingham, looking out over the bay. I ate oysters and oysters. Gee whiz, we ought to have an oyster thread.
 
You are absolutely right, Monsieur Pablo, and that is just one of the reasons why I love you. But you are putting me in the awkward position of having to admit that what I eat is crap, not because I am stupid, but because my paycheck is stupid. Stupid inadequate.
Don't worry. With the impending economic upswing you'll be drowing in inexpensive fresh, healthy foods very soon. You may even get some exercise picking avocados, walnuts, tomatoes. If things go sideways there's always roadkill. I got some Cajun recipes.
 
Back
Top Bottom