Originally Posted By: chrisri
Originally Posted By: tratman2000
They would have to prove it was an oil related problem due to neglect to turn down warranty but it always helps having some type of log you could per say back date one useing alteranating ink pens of color. I have 2 kias with lifetime bumper to bumper warranty and what I do is tear off the lid to the filter box and write on the back the date milage and what oil went in and save it. Although I've read of some that go as far to video themselves changing it detailing the odometer and new filter and oil.
So what you are saying is that Toyota will warrant any engine failure even if car is not maintained at official Toyota dealership? All you need is to make notes on a piece of paper when you supposedly changed oil? This sounds insane, but great if works. There's no way you could pull something like that over here.
Car mfg's in the US can not, by law, require that you have work done at dealerships other than warranty work. If they require that, or require only OEM parts be used, then they must provide it free.
By law here in the US we can do our own work. We just have to make sure we use the correct parts( by application )and fluids( correct weights/spec's/ratings/etc... ). If you DIY, or even have a non dealer shop do the work, you just have to keep your receipts showing the work was done using the right stuff and done on time. No car mfg, and especially Toyota, is going to accept a maintenance log without receipts backing up the entries. Not for major engine repairs anyway.
This whole "they must prove what you did caused it" defense so many talk about when this stuff comes up( part of the same law I talk of above = Magnuson-Moss Act )is really misused and misunderstood. The "proof" card can only be played when it is established that the owner did everything right and the car mfg still tries to deny coverage. The vehicle owner who DIY's, or has work done at non dealer shops, actually has the burden of proof at the outset. Here is an example of what I mean...
A vehicle owner does their own OC's. The car mfg calls for 5W30 oil, with the API Starburst, that meets their oil standard XXX. The oil must also be changed within 6 months or 6,000 miles( whichever comes 1st ). The vehicle owner has to follow these requirements while under warranty. So, the vehicle owner follows the requirements to the letter and keeps receipts showing they did everything right, and on time, using their preferred brand of oil and oil filters. Both met all requirements and were the correct weight/part #.
At some point within warranty the engine suffers a failure, and even after showing proof proper maintenance was done, the car mfg still refuses to repair it under warranty. THIS is when the car mfg has the burden of proof. AFTER the owner shows they did things properly. Not before but after.
The car mfg denies the repair and claims the aftermarket brand oil filter caused it. For this to hold up legally, here, they must be able to show the filter actually caused the failure. They can not deny coverage just because it was not an OEM filter. IF the filter did have a defect or somehow caused the engine failure, and the car mfg can show/prove it, they actually can deny the repair. If not, legally, they must fix it.
Hope that is clear?