Using LifePO4 battery in my 2024 Honda Accord Hybrid for great mileage. Your thoughts?

1 Can’t get you pictures to work.
2 Anyone that says your “ Warranty is void” is an idiot. Which is not to say that repairs related to the battery and electrical system are going to be covered under the warranty.
3 hope it doesn’t get cold where you are or that something other than this battery can start and power the car.
Try this link to my thread on the Honda Accord forum. You will see the pictures there also.

https://www.driveaccord.net/threads...ce-upgrades-adventure-and-more.570743/page-14
 
Will your insurance cover the total loss if the battery burns your car down? Just curious, since you are using a non-standard battery here.
Honestly, I do not know for sure, but I can tell you that if my car burns down I will file it on my insurance immediately. And I will hope they pay to get the car replaced.
 
Might be worthwhile to call and ask.
I am not a soothsayer who sees the future, but I can tell you that I know their answer. They will say NO!

So, I am just hoping the battery does not burn down my car. I plan to keep the battery in my car for a while until I atleast draw a conclusion from my experiment if the battery helps to maintain consistent high mpg numbers or not.
 
Genuinely curious, if all functions in a hybrid car could be ran off of Li ion batteries, why do hybrid cars even have a lead acid battery? Why wouldn't all electrical energy demand be pulled from the primary Li ion battery pack, and just eliminate the lead acid? This would same money, weight, space, and complexity. Less demand on the BCM. No battery tray. Fewer battery cables.

Being a motorhome guy, I've done a little research into Li ion batteries. I was under the impression that they are not well suited for the sort of current demand that a starter puts on them. I do understand that a starter for a small engine, as is in most hybrid cars, doesn't pull near as much current as the starter on a larger engine. But it is still a pretty good spike. Can anyone here say with certainty?
It is a trade off between a large DC->DC converter (with a large capacitor to stabilize the output) or a smaller one with a 12V battery. I don't think they cannot be done, but rather focus the R&D on the more important things and just leave the 12V system alone to reduce risk.
 
Nobody is arguing what you’re getting for MPG. The car is efficient. Agreed.

The claim that you experienced a big increase because of a different 12V battery is the point of contention.

You have discovered the latest in a long line of specious claims - the 100 MPG carburetor, the magnetic fuel alignment device, and the intake “vortex” booster, for example - miracles of efficiency “improvement” that simply made no sense from an engineering or basic physics perspective.

You claim the what - better efficiency - and maybe you see a result. That results has dozens of potential explanations, but you choose to believe that it’s your battery. That’s your belief, and since you haven’t shown how you controlled for all the other variables, it remains belief.

What you cannot prove, and where your explanation falls short, is “how”.

How does this battery take that much load off your engine?

How does it increase your MPG?

Miracle alignment of fuel molecules in the line via magnetic force? Nope, that’s been claimed. Better mixing of fuel and air via a stamped piece of sheetmetal in the intake? Nope, that’s been claimed, too. Secret technology suppressed by big oil? Yeah…claimed, as well.

Which leaves you believing, and claiming, that your 12V charging circuit was responsible for about 5 MPG. Call it the difference between 55 and 60 MPG. Which are your numbers, right? A bump from 55 to 60 MPG?

At 60 MPH, that is a burn difference of 0.08 gallons, give or take, or roughly 10,000 BTU.

So, 10,000 BTU saved in an hour, is a load of 3,000 watts. So, your battery is saving 3,000 watts at 12V - dude that’s 250 AMPS.

You want us all to believe that your new battery takes a consistent 250 fewer amps to charge than the last battery.

You are claiming that the electric use in your car went down by 250 amps on the basis of a battery?

250 amps?

You’re going to have to do better than that.
To add to that, there was a claim somewhere along the way in here about weight savings.

What's the difference in weight between the stock lead acid battery and this battery? Would 30lbs be a realistic number if the original is say 40lbs and this one is 10lbs? I'm sort of pulling those numbers out of my rear end, especially as I doubt the original weighs 40lbs and the replacement is as light as 10lbs, but let's go with it for the point(s) I want to make.

Google tells me that depending on the trim, 3,458-3,532lbs is the curb weight of a 2024 Accord Hybrid. I'm actually surprised a modern vehicle the size of an Accord is that light, but I'll go with it. That means that the battery change is less than 1% of the total weight of the car. Somehow that translates to a 10% increase in gas mileage?

Just to go with a few other points:

1. If I let my work backpack get too full, it might push 30lbs. I think my MKZ is about the same weight as an Accord Hybrid, although of course it's a different beast. Still, though, if I claimed I saw a 10% difference in gas mileage on days I didn't have my work backpack in the car, everyone would(rightly) say I was crazy.

2. I'm 6'2" and weigh about 230lbs. I know I'm a bit on the pudgy side, and I'm sure my doctor would be really happy if I was more like 200lbs. If I were to lose 30lbs, would my gas mileage increase by 10%? No, of course not. It certainly hasn't changed notice from when I was more like 280lbs a few years ago. For a lot of Americans wanting to haul 30lbs less regularly in their car, though, losing weight themselves would probably be a better strategy..

3. Offhand, a gallon of gasoline is, what, 6lbs(based on water is 8lbs/gallon and most non-halogenated organics have a specific gravity between .7 and .8)? I'm sure that's close enough. A 2024 Accord Hybrid has a 12.8 gallon gas tank. That means a full tank is ~77lbs, and a 1/4 full tank is 19.2lbs. We'll call it 50lbs difference, or 25lbs difference between half and full. Someone fixated on hypermiling could easily cut about as much weight as this battery by say only filling their tank half full...
 
This is the odometer of the guy who bought the LifePO4 battery and claimed that after he installed it, he started getting consistently high mpg numbers. Look at the pictures of his odometer.

This thread is my own experiment to see if I will get the same results after installing the LiFePO4 battery. This experiment will last for some months before I can draw my own conclusion.

Look at his pictures below.
It shows he got 61 mpg over 10,000 miles.
It also shows he got 71 mpg over 3,216 miles.

So I bought the battery to also see if I will consistently be getting higher mpg in city driving.

Here are the pictures of his odometer to show the high mpg numbers. Even a Camry cannot claim this. A Toyota Prius cannot easily claim this either.
PicR0w9.jpeg

vMegCGk.jpeg

gTGyh7A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
LMAO I certainly will trust a fully certified 30 plus year Honda Tech over anything you say. I can assure you any Honda dealer will look for ANYTHING to void a warranty that's a fact.
An Honda dealer cannot "void a warranty" if that's actually what your 30 plus year honda tech said he's beyond an idiot.

they can and probably will refuse to cover under the warranty an electrical repair that can be related to the battery. That is not even close to the same thing as "voiding a warranty".

People need to stop saying "void warranty" because it makes you sound stupid.
 
I’m missing something, here. How would a change in battery chemistry yield a 10% improvement in efficiency?
Good question.

The HAH battery is used differently than a typical SLI battery. And it’s often allowed to drop real low. Lower than is healthy for a lead acid battery.

LFP drop in.12v replacements are real, and perform well in use cases similar to a hybrid. No high current crank condition, no high rate uncontrolled alternator. Below freezing issues are real. NATO 6T batteries have resolved this through internal heaters. Not sure the run of the mill 12v will have that.

A hybrid with a tiny battery to eat up harmonics and ripple, and keep the keyless entry and a few relays on is an ideal place for li-ion. But it has its issues too.
 
Good question.

The HAH battery is used differently than a typical SLI battery. And it’s often allowed to drop real low. Lower than is healthy for a lead acid battery.

LFP drop in.12v replacements are real, and perform well in use cases similar to a hybrid. No high current crank condition, no high rate uncontrolled alternator. Below freezing issues are real. NATO 6T batteries have resolved this through internal heaters. Not sure the run of the mill 12v will have that.

A hybrid with a tiny battery to eat up harmonics and ripple, and keep the keyless entry and a few relays on is an ideal place for li-ion. But it has its issues too.
You’re an engineer, with a PhD, and understand batteries better than anyone.

Was my BTU to watts to amps math correct?

How much does it take to charge/maintain a typical LA battery in normal use?

The sustained load on most cars is dozens of amps to run things like fuel pump, ECU, injectors, blower motors, headlights, and infotainment, with momentary loads like windows, ABS module, perhaps, brake lights.

For the 12V system, not the hybrid system, I just don’t see how a battery chemistry change makes much of a difference - the 12V system is there to start the engine, and provide some capacity for momentary surge load like window operation, brake lights, whatever, while the alternator sustains the steady state loads.

Most of my cars have a 140 Amp alternator. Fairly typical.

I just don’t see how you can gain a reduction of 250 amps load to explain the fuel efficiency increase when we are not changing the load on that alternator, and that load is created by running accessories.
 
You’re an engineer, with a PhD, and understand batteries better than anyone.

Was my BTU to watts to amps math correct?
TBH I hadn’t even read through that far in the thread when replying.

My first gut reaction is that charge control, and use of the battery, and provision of the power for a range of things is done differently.

It’s not uncommon for the HAH battery to be maintained at 12.5V in use (less than 100% SOC), and sit at 11.9-12V after parked a while.

My point was that it isn’t reliant on the battery the same way. Sitting at low SOCs is damaging to a lead acid battery, but not to a Li-ion. In fact, it’s favorable for the Li-ion.

Regarding math, the battery is either charged or it isn’t. My HAH has a group 51 battery. Call it 55Ah. And let’s say it sits between 0% SOC and 95% SOC every single trip. That’s about 650Wh.

How much fuel does it take to make 650Wh? Well, the inverter is probably 97% efficient, the motor and drive is probably 95% efficient, and the engine is about 30% efficient at best. So that’s the math.

How much does it take to charge/maintain a typical LA battery in normal use?
If it is fully charged, then I’d call it <0.5A. If not, see above.

Note that the Li-ion requires zero, it can sit at any SOC it desires. It will charge slightly more efficiently, but it will take about the same Wh overall to fully charge from zero to full. But there could be a scenario where the HAH maintains at 12.5, the Li-ion couldn’t care less, maybe the charge control doesn’t even invoke a charge, while the lead acid would absorb. I don’t know. But it’s Wh…

The sustained load on most cars is dozens of amps to run things like fuel pump, ECU, injectors, blower motors, headlights, and infotainment, with momentary loads like windows, ABS module, perhaps, brake lights.
All of that is handled by the hybrid battery and motor generator. The 12v battery may clean up power quality a bit. Not much else.

For the 12V system, not the hybrid system, I just don’t see how a battery chemistry change makes much of a difference - the 12V system is there to start the engine, and provide some capacity for momentary surge load like window operation, brake lights, whatever, while the alternator sustains the steady state loads.
I tend to agree. Unless the car is short tripped and the parasitical are high enough that it does a real number on the lead acid, but less of one on the Li-ion. We do see that sometimes. But it’s going to be a difference of watt-hours, not massive, IMO.


I just don’t see how you can gain a reduction of 250 amps load to explain the fuel efficiency increase when we are not changing the load on that alternator, and that load is created by running accessories.
I’m not either. At least not at the level that is being claimed. We know “smart” alternator charging is a thing, and can offer incremental mpg benefit. But that’s fractions of a MPG, not huge amounts, IMO.

And the batteries are small. The Li-ion will be half the weight. But half of a small amount is a small amount.

So it doesn’t add up, IMO.
 
Reading through that thread and, wow...

Apparently it was $350 total, bought from a seller on Alibaba. That would instill me with a lot of confidence...

Also, apparently the battery is a touch over 20lbs. Per the OP, the stock lead acid was 27lbs. So much for one of the claimed benefits being weight savings-7lbs...

They also added a full sized spare. How much does that weigh? A lot more than 7lbs I'm sure.
 
Last edited:
Reading through that thread and, wow...

Apparently it was $350 total, bought from a seller on Alibaba. That would instill me with a lot of confidence...

Also, apparently the battery is a touch over 20lbs. Per the OP, the stock lead acid was 27lbs. So much for one of the claimed benefits being weight savings-7lbs...

They also added a full sized spare. How much does that weigh? A lot more than 7lbs I'm sure.
Very correct.

The new battery weighs 20.8 lbs. The oem battery weighs 27.2 lbs.

I bought the battery from a seller on alibaba. They shipped the battery and it was held by US customs for inspection for some days or say more than a week before it was released.

Yes, my car did not come with a full size spare. I bought and installed a full size spare. It definitely added some real weight. I think maybe if I removed the spare tire, I may gain atleast 1 more mpg on my number.
 
As of today, I am averaging 65 mpg after 372 miles. This is 50% city and 50% highway with a top speed of about 60 mph. My tires are set at 36 psi.

I do not know if the LiFePO4 battery is making it easier for me to maintain this mpg, but I will see as time goes by I still have many months before I draw any conclusion if using this battery helps me easily get higher mpg numbers.
3jq4soo.jpeg
 
As of today, I am averaging 65 mpg after 372 miles. This is 50% city and 50% highway with a top speed of about 60 mph. My tires are set at 36 psi.

I do not know if the LiFePO4 battery is making it easier for me to maintain this mpg, but I will see as time goes by I still have many months before I draw any conclusion if using this battery helps me easily get higher mpg numbers.
3jq4soo.jpeg
What is your AC set at? Ive read thst HAH has ideal efficiency with ac set at 70, Econ mode, and of course don’t let it change into heating mode…. But ac use will be a big factor.
 
What is your AC set at? Ive read thst HAH has ideal efficiency with ac set at 70, Econ mode, and of course don’t let it change into heating mode…. But ac use will be a big factor.
I drive only in ECON mode. My ac js set at 60. In Econ mode, the ac is not as cold as in normal mode.
When I hypermile, I turn off the ac any time I feel I can live without it. Also, I almost always run my ac only at 60. I never chose any other number because at 60 in econ mode, the ac is dialed back a little bit. It is not as cold.
Kh7kfPa.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom