Using a lower octane fuel than recommended

Probably some reference to a supposed cleaning of the combustion chamber. Whatever it does or does not do, one thing it does not do is increase the octane rating.

And just interested, how do you know it keeps the injectors clean? Do you remove them for inspection?
No scientific evidence, just anecdotical. It just idles and accelerates flawlessly. Sounds like a low mileage engine, although it it has 185,000 miles on it.
 
I'm fine with it as long as it costs the 10cents extra it takes to make it and not the 60cents to 1.10 extra it costs currently.
Is it really that cheap to make? I was thinking it was 10% more to bump to mid grade, so that's like 30 cents right there. Both bumps could be 20% and that's 60 cents. I mean, for tools, tires, and whatnot, going up a grade is often 10% or more. But I have no idea what it takes to bump octane (other than octane or octane-like components in the fuel).

I know ethanol can bump octane but adding that so as to bump is like shooting yourself in the foot since it costs btu's.
 
Interesting question. My 2021 Kia Soul 2.0 manual says 87 is the minimum octane it should use. So that begs the question “ if i use more than minimum octane, what are the benefits?” Of course there’s no answer, but with gas prices going up with no end in sight the hamster is digesting 87 period. Doesn’t seem to matter either. Just for fun I tried a tank of 91 and found little difference. The engine does have a 12.5:1 compression ratio but it’s an Atkinson cycle mill so what’s the actual comp ratio it’s using at any given time? It’s altered via valve timing but I’ve yet to find out if it’s a fixed valve timing or adjustable, octane dependent. FWIW it never pings that I’ve noticed.
 
Gotta hand to to Mazda engineers for pulling that off. My son runs 87 in his without any issues.


Mine did fine too but on a couple of hills near me I could tell the engine needed some help. The reality is that I could run 87 just fine and one those hills use the Sport Mode as I do now.

The issue I had noticed was that on these hills which are long and winding I usually get behind slower traffic. That tended to bog the engine down. Sport Mode keeps the RPMs up and it’s easy to toggle on and off.
 
Interesting question. My 2021 Kia Soul 2.0 manual says 87 is the minimum octane it should use. So that begs the question “ if i use more than minimum octane, what are the benefits?” Of course there’s no answer, but with gas prices going up with no end in sight the hamster is digesting 87 period. Doesn’t seem to matter either. Just for fun I tried a tank of 91 and found little difference. The engine does have a 12.5:1 compression ratio but it’s an Atkinson cycle mill so what’s the actual comp ratio it’s using at any given time? It’s altered via valve timing but I’ve yet to find out if it’s a fixed valve timing or adjustable, octane dependent. FWIW it never pings that I’ve noticed.


I believe the computer will adjust for any variances.

Years ago while traveling through Utah I filled up with 85. That seems to be a normal octane grade at higher elevations. I had no issues either. This was with a 2000 Mitsubishi 3.0 V6
 
I'm fine with it as long as it costs the 10cents extra it takes to make it and not the 60cents to 1.10 extra it costs currently.
Do you see premium fuel being priced $1.10/gallon higher than regular ? $0.60 is the norm in southwest Ohio although I know one station that does charge $1 more.
 
I never use a fuel below the recommended minimum octane rating. Some manufactures give HP ratings for high and low octane fuel and allow both to be used depending on whether or not you want the extra power. Neither of my current vehicles do this and so they both get 87 octane as required by the owners manual. I'm busy and important and do many important things so I don't really put too much thought into it beyond the manual...

...and I guess also writing about it on BITOG.
 
Do you see premium fuel being priced $1.10/gallon higher than regular ? $0.60 is the norm in southwest Ohio although I know one station that does charge $1 more.
.60 is most common sams or costco .30 to .50, but some stations such as shell .80-1+ often.
 
Costco has 91 here cheaper than regular on any gas station, so all three cars get premium. Our regular is 85 due to elevation, and even my Toyota doesn’t like it.
 
I feed my N52 engine 93 octane throughout the summer, but now that temps (and therefore IAT's have dropped) I have tried a couple of tanks of 89 octane (mid grade). From what I understand the mid grade fuel is just a mix of the premium and regular, and 89 is the minimum octane rating. So far, no noticable difference in performance, but that is also just judging seat of pants, so take my findings with a grain.
 
View attachment 81339
Stellantis definitely makes it clear that 87 might result in some light pinging, but durability is probably not compromised enough to be a concern (in their eyes). Mine does feel a bit weak (off-the-line) when running 87, but I have not been able to verify any difference in fuel economy.
I switched back to using 89 and my Ram definitely feels a bit peppier off the line. It also seems to go into/stay in MDS a little more since I got my new tires as well.
 
I am like some others who have already commented. Mid-grade (89 R + M) makes my cars run better. I was told by a supplier that hauls for local QTs that 87 regular is really 85-86 most of the time due to oxy blended additives. He said it rarely tests as 87 that is published on the pump.
 
I was told by a supplier that hauls for local QTs that 87 regular is really 85-86 most of the time due to oxy blended additives. He said it rarely tests as 87 that is published on the pump.
Looks like Missouri Ag department tests fuel's octane ratings (and they do this at the pump, not at the supplier) so I'd be skeptical of what you were told. The same thing will happen with higher octane fuels too.
 
Back
Top Bottom