One would expect a good uoa when using any top tier synethic for only 3,000 miles. This is no usefull information other than the engine was not self distructing. JMO
Yes, 2.4L Nissan Frontiers with small sumps.quote:
Has anyone else noticed increased consumption using 5w20 where not Spec ?
Well, using thick-head logic it shouldn't shear down as much. Since the base oils are the same, the "5w" part, the "20" part indicates that there is less viscosity index improvers to shear down.quote:
Originally posted by PJH:
Then what does 5w20 shear down to after ......?
Then like 5w15quote:
Originally posted by 427Z06:
Well, using thick-head logic it shouldn't shear down as much. Since the base oils are the same, the "5w" part, the "20" part indicates that there is less viscosity index improvers to shear down.quote:
Originally posted by PJH:
Then what does 5w20 shear down to after ......?
Check the UOAs of 5w20s posted on this forum. They don't shear very much, and certainly not out of grade. 5w30s routinely shear out of grade.quote:
Originally posted by PJH:
Dagwood
Then what does 5w20 shear down to after ......?
It's a function of the specs that 5w20s have to meet and the way they are made. By using higher VI base oils and the fact that there is less viscosity spread, these oils use less VI improvers. It's the VI improvers that permanently shear causing viscosity loss. 5w30s have more VI improvers. Any oil with over a 20 pt viscosity spread is going to shear some, and some more than others depending on the quality of the base oils and VI improvers used.quote:
Originally posted by bob_ninja:
G-Man,
Why is that? Why would 5W30s shear down much more than 5W20s? Does it apply to both dino and synth? Is it common accross brands?
SUS is old school, baby. I convert to cSt. Anything <= 56.8 SUS, I consider SAE 20, i.e. < 9.3 cSt.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
Check your list again. Some of the ones I looked at were still 30wt's. 15 of the UOA's had a viscosity > 54 @210*F 30wt's are roughly 54-61.