Originally Posted By: jpa
Cujet - I never considered that perspective of "holding the torque" and stretching the bolt.
My father rebuilt a SeaDoo engine using one of those dial torque wrenches.
While it seems strange to many who are used to garden variety bolts (hardware) , my example is a good one. ARP head studs are designed to stretch. They thread into the block with the standard coarse threads. The nut, however, is fine threaded. This puts much more "pull" on the stud than the OEM head bolt can produce (with it's coarse threads) . Hence the excellent performance of ARP type products in high boost applications.
The ARP stud's "nuts" are typically lubricated with a product that reduces friction, allowing the nut to turn easily under high load. At least for a few seconds. As the stud stretches, the nut turns a bit. The beam type torque wrench will give excellent results in this example.
It's not unusual for improperly torqued "stretch" type studs and bolts to fail under cyclic loads, when improperly torqued. Aircraft connecting rods have had this issue for the last 100 years!
The old school SeaDoo 2 stroke engines had similar stretch type stainless bolts holding down the head. They were easily ruined by sloppy technicians.