ARCO,
I agree fully with your opinions. Yes, the "Gamma" engine in this Accent is very highly tuned. 11:1 compression, VVT, Variable length intake manifold. Its 1.6L with 138 h.p. From an interstate roll, when you kick it down and the 6 speed auto chooses what gear it wants this thing really screams! You can feel the variable length intake kick in like a small nitrous shot!
I DO run the [censored] out of it to Redline quite often for the reasons you mentioned and also to show any weaknesses while its still under warranty. I don't mean abuse, but when the engine is fully up to operating temperature , then it is subject to a full throttle blast to redline at any time. I have a long, steep interstate hill that I can take from a stop at a red light, accellerate at WOT all the way up the entrance ramp and to the top of the hill (WOT 100%.) The car hits exactly 100 mph at the crest of the hill. I think it does good to help remove "stubborn" deposits.
So, I don't think grannying around is the issue. But like you said, it is a high strung engine, but the owner's manual says it will run on 87 fine. My belief is that there are some carbon deposits causing the ping, even though the Top Tier additives are supposed to prevent it.
87 octane, and 11:1 compression may be able to work with clever cam timing through the VVT, but it seems that it wouldn't take much carbon buildup to raise the compression ratio, and act as a glow plug. But the [censored] additives are supposed to prevent this!
Is gas really full of that much garbage these days? Hard substances that the detergent can't affect?
Someone mentioned a faulty knock sensor. But the car wasn't put into any extreme situation to be pinging in the first place. Or do manufacturers really lean on the timing and such to the point that they NEED an agressive knock sensor to keep things under control? Maybe the knock sensor IS the problem. I don't know. But the point is the engineers are being forced to get extreme in the gas mileage war because OPEC is being allowed to DESTROY OUR ECONOMY!
The ironic thing is that this car with its 6 speed auto, VVT, 11:1 compression, variable length intake manifold, low rolling resistance tires, low ride height, low front fascia, and low vehicle weight and a puny 1.6L displacement are all geared to maximize fuel efficiecy...
But, the [censored] thing only matches some of the regular old economy cars I've had from the past. I mean late 80's and early to mid 90's economy cars. [censored], I even had one OLD Honda that would beat it handily in a fuel economy contest. That Honda was 24 years older and with NONE of the "high tech" features I mentioned this Hyundai has.
And this Hyundai is supposed to be one of the TOP fuel economy cars available today.
what gives?