Originally posted by PandaBear:
[QB] Guys, this is what a Ford engineer told me on anandtech.com during a casual conversation:
Part 1:
Taurus's have always had 'low life' transmissions. Forging the steel of quality control and quality materials that'd make it outlast things that usually fail last in the car such as...engine, frame, exc, would cost unfeasable amounts of money. Most manufactures, especially Ford, do demographics and look at statistics to see how long people keep such cars (usually 4 years, with an 8-10 year life expectency for your typical sedan) and how to build it most economically to last that long.
Anyway, the transmission in your Taurus has a lifespan of 120,000-150,000 miles,
This form of 'planned obsolesence' is sad. We have engines that can go 300K or more but you'll have to rebuild the tranny (at $2k or more a pop) a couple of times in that period. Maybe instead of spending $$$ on "demographics and statistics"
(bean-counters) they should give that money to engineering so that they can improve the product.
As I stated on another thread my friends 98' Hyundai Sonatas A/T (Mitsubishi KM-175 - J-U-N-K) just crapped out at 109K despite servicing every 30K. This happened to the KM-175 in my 92' Sonata at roughly the same mileage/service interval. The A/T shop that we called said "junk it, it ain't worth fixing". Does this mean that Hyundais are throw away cars? It seems that engineers have made engines more durable but much improvement is still needed when it comes to A/T's.
PS. Can anybody tell me what model A/T GM uses in my 02' Buick Century? It is a very smooth-shifting (and I hope durable) unit.