I'd like to see it in a Wrangler, but I doubt that it would fit.Given its power that turboed 3.0 Liter would make a fine Challenger or Charger engine.
I'd like to see it in a Wrangler, but I doubt that it would fit.Given its power that turboed 3.0 Liter would make a fine Challenger or Charger engine.
You could always make it fitI'd like to see it in a Wrangler, but I doubt that it would fit.
My TJ has an I6 but I don't think the engine compartment off the JL is as roomy.You could always make it fit
Wranglers used to have inline 6s, I don't see why they couldn't have them again
I think it's cool the stuff exists for pushing the limits of what don't seem physically possible, but I just don't understand how they can sell enough of these things to justify making them at this price. I'm not saying I'm in the price bracket to buy $100k vehicles, but I definitely hit a cap on what I want to spend on vehicles short of what I could afford. At some point I saw a level of diminishing returns on a depreciating asset that I would effectively be burning money. Maybe the experiences I look for when driving just make it possible for me to be a cheaper date. Love me some horsepower though.Not sure I can wrap my head around a >$100k vehicle that is 3L and 7,700lb being this performance category either...
I know they can make high power I6's but I wonder if it's "worth it". Long crankshaft means long engine, with crankshaft twisting. You can avoid twisting by making the crank thicker and heavier--but that defeats the idea of quickly rev'ing up. I know BMW made good I6's for a long time but I wonder what the incentive is for anyone else to dive back in there, not when V6's and even I4's might do the job. Well, maybe outside of this uber-SUV category.Jeep could bring the 4.0 inline 6 back, with turbos this time
At some point I think makers want to have a flagship model that makes them look good, and makes people aspire for. Doesn't have to make them money on the unit itself, but it may draw people in the door who buy something else. And maybe they are just blowing R&D budget, in a "use it or lose it" scenario.I think it's cool the stuff exists for pushing the limits of what don't seem physically possible, but I just don't understand how they can sell enough of these things to justify making them at this price.
That's probably close to a base Suburban. I sure the sub 700 FICO buyers will love it!View attachment 167219
Looks like you can get a base model Wagoneer L with that engine for $70K. Honestly that isn’t terrible considering the space, towing capabilities and the segment it competes in.
I doubt you can get a base 4x4 Suburban for $70K…That's probably close to a base Suburban. I sure the sub 700 FICO buyers will love it!![]()
Well..prices start in the $60,000.00s. But yea/options transaction prices are a different thing.I doubt you can get a base 4x4 Suburban for $70K…
Its power is frankly excessive for most uses. But a well designed i6 with a smaller turbo with minimal lag would be great.Given its power that turboed 3.0 Liter would make a fine Challenger or Charger engine.
I too have a N54. There is never any scenario where it can’t get to where I want it to go. But my 278/312 V8 has a completely different manner, which in the case of this vehicle, may be the 3.0 v. 6.4 comparison. Take my advice the latter is a better experience. Only when trade off is introduced, is the smaller displacement considered.Its power is frankly excessive for most uses. But a well designed i6 with a smaller turbo with minimal lag would be great.
500hpnin a non 6500 lb vehicle is almost worthless. I can’t even use the 300/300 in my 135i without being at illegal speeds and on the verge of getting in trouble.
But I see your point. Would be fun for a bit.
The 8 speeds take up too much room.You could always make it fit
Wranglers used to have inline 6s, I don't see why they couldn't have them again
They do manage to get the 6.4L in there, how much longer is the I6?My TJ has an I6 but I don't think the engine compartment off the JL is as roomy.
View attachment 167219
Looks like you can get a base model Wagoneer L with that engine for $70K. Honestly that isn’t terrible considering the space, towing capabilities and the segment it competes in.
If you’re saying that someone needs a 6.4v8 to go get groceries in their 6500lb suv, I’d say you’re looney.I too have a N54. There is never any scenario where it can’t get to where I want it to go. But my 278/312 V8 has a completely different manner, which in the case of this vehicle, may be the 3.0 v. 6.4 comparison. Take my advice the latter is a better experience. Only when trade off is introduced, is the smaller displacement considered.
I noticed GM tones down the 2.7L in the entry level Colorado - something a parts house would own - but boosts it to a joyous 310/430 in the nicer 4WD units …Its power is frankly excessive for most uses. But a well designed i6 with a smaller turbo with minimal lag would be great.
500hpnin a non 6500 lb vehicle is almost worthless. I can’t even use the 300/300 in my 135i without being at illegal speeds and on the verge of getting in trouble.
But I see your point. Would be fun for a bit.
Boy, the AMG, ///M and SRT SUV's must really chide you then, lolBut most consumer use cases are absurd. No, I don’t want some idiot rocketing a 6500lb suv down the on-ramp at some excessive rate of acceleration and ultimately creating safety issues for all.
Well, they again are virtually worthless for practical use, super fancy appointments and strong brakes aside. Getting to 65 mph in no time flat serves very little practical purpose. Unless you are so entitled that you are planning to drive illegal speeds on the public roads, which is a different conversation.Boy, the AMG, ///M and SRT SUV's must really chide you then, lol![]()