Synlube MSDS

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Miro is logging in using various usernames I wish he would just log in as himself. What would be the point of logging in as supposedly different people? To try to show that there are several satisfied customers that use Synlube? It might be more effective if some actual customers of Synlube posted their experiences.

It certainly looks like captain_kirk may possibly be Miro. Does captain_kirk not say that he has had zero credit card problems for about ten years running? That does not sound like a customer-it sounds like the owner of the company.

I for one am exceedingly tired of people I do not know coming to this website and telling everybody here that Synlube is great and pushing us to start using it. I am not going to trust the word of somebody I totally do not know. Everybody here keeps saying, supply a VOA or UOA.

And people are not going to trust a company that lists various addresses but cannot be located.

I can't handle the Synlube website myself. It seems to me that Miro would be able to clean up his own website and clear up problems like the Mazda RX-7 issue.

If Miro wants to push Synlube here he probably should see if he could be a site sponser.

Synlube still relies on supporters who are abusive to anybody who questions the Synlube claims. A professional business enterprise is polite.

I realize Synlube is small but Synlube needs to get up to date and borrow better PR and customer relations from other businesses.
 
Miro is looking to sell product and bi-pass becoming a sponsor. You won't see to many more Synlube users giving us reports, Miro is running out of IP addresses.

I was reading on the other board someone saying that people should buy Synlube to prove the product works. LOL They need to do the proving not us and not at our expense.

This whole thing is a joke, although amusing and fun for a while, it is getting old now.
 
A person at the other board had some really good points. He said basically it is not up to the CUSTOMER to try Synlube and either prove it works or does not work. It is up to SYNLUBE to prove to the customers that their product works and is worth the considerable sum of money to buy it.

Ome thing I have very much gotten tired of is being told I have no right to make any comments about Synlube unless and until I have tried it. In addition we are told that we should try this product just on the basis of statments made by people we do not know. It is obvious that Synlube has no real intention of supplying any real data on the performance of Synlube.

This entire Synlube business is getting very tiring. I am tired of the endless Synlube song. One of these days someone is bound to get hold of Synlube and do a VOA on it. That hopefully will put an end to all of this because I suspect the VOA will not make Synlube look great.
 
If that VOA comes to be, watch the Synlube people come out of the woodwork attacking the VOA, and the method used to test the product. Remember this is a space age product, and no one from earth can properly test it.

It should be interesting, and possibly perk up the entertainment value these threads were once providing.
 
Perhaps synlube l4l should take a few pages from Amsoil's book.
I don't use the oil, as it doesn't meet the specs I look for, but I don't think it's a bad oil.

The Amsoil people here don't get bent out of shape. Nor do any of the sponsors. You don't get attacked if you ask from them that which we seek for this stuff.

The difference between them and this speaks for itself.

Synlube Lube 4 Life, beimg such a small entity, should be going the extra mile to stand out.

Well, I guess it has. Just not the way it had hoped.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that the VOA on Synlube that members will be seeing soon will show us what's in this mysterious oil.

I believe it will show that Synlube is probably using Delvac-1 5W-40 Motor Oil.

I also believe that it will show that Miro is probably adding 2 cans of Lubro-Moly to the oil.

I also believe that it will show that Miro is using some powdered PTFE or maybe some Slick50.

I also believe that the VOA will show us why these few UOA's on Synlube do not look so great.

I also believe that this VOA will show us that Synlube is an old school formula and that it is not something we should use in today's vehicles.

I also believe that this VOA will show us that this Synlube is not as good as the oil's we are using now.
 
I also believe that they will try every way possible to cast doubt and discredit the report. It should be good.

I'm pretty much done for tonight. I'll check in tomorrow.
 
I don't think Synlube has the talent level to take a few pages from anybody's book. They seem pretty much incapable of anything-even cleaning up their woeful website.

They came to the wrong website to try and sell their stuff. People here expect proof-not being told over and over to try some unknown product being pushed by unknown people. Not to mention the fact that nobody can locate the Synlube facility where this unknown product being pushed by unknown people come sfrom.
 
Originally Posted By: Mystic
It certainly looks like captain_kirk may possibly be Miro.

My guess is it is that stefano guy, the person identified on the Nevada permanently revoked license documents for synlube as the owner. Any reasonable person can easily see he has an ownership interest by the way he defends synlube.

Also a person defending synlube on BITOG apparently sent miro an email in which he identified himself as steve. Stephano is the same name as "stephen" or "steven" in English. Personally I don't care who is who. It's all a scam in my opinion and I don't trust any of them for one second. But everyone should read all the information and make their own judgement.

From Noria:

***

WOW this explains everything !!!

this is what I just got from BTOG from the "operator/owner":

"Synlube is not a sponsor. You have been pushing it and trying to sell it on my board and that can result in being banned. Each person has a right to their opinion concerning oils and can discuss them but you are going overboard. Do not make another post concerning Synlube.

Helen"

Just got this through the OIL GUY

Now it turns out, BOB is not a GUY but it is a HELEN - doubt a "man"

WHAT A FRAUD !!!

And they are picking on you - like you say - they would probably glorify SynLube if you'd offered bribes to them !

Steve

****
 
I believe if Miro tries to cast doubt then it will backfire, nobody believes Synlube at this time, and they never will.

I have not seen any members here come out and say they are dumping there Pennzoil Platinum and are now using Synlube.
 
Anybody who would dump a proven motor oil for this Synlube stuff would be taking a grave risk with their engine. And at $32.00 a quart the Synlube better last for 50,000 miles! Who really wants to try this stuff in the engine of their car or truck?

And if the 15,000 mile UOA of Synlube for the Ford truck is legit this stuff fails before 15,000 miles! At 15,000 miles the oil in the Ford truck had low TBN and high iron indicating excessive wear. Not to mention some strange viscosity action.
 
Maybe Captain Kirk needs to show us some proof that his Synlube is better than the oil's we are using.

BITOGER's do not need to be the guinnea pigs, Miro or shall we call him Captain Kirk needs to show us the proof.
 
One thing for sure-you can typically find a legit business using Google Mapping and driving past the facility. The mere fact that nobody can find Synlube is really all the proof anybody needs. I have no doubt that if we knew where Pennzoil HQ was we could find it and view it using Google Mapping and drive past an actual facility.

Who really wants to have any dealings with a company that cannot be located? If you went to where some company was supposed to be and you could not find it what would be the next logical step?
 
I bet the reason nobody can see the Synlube Facility when they drive by is because it is underground in a BUNKER.
 
I worked for a company that paid employees to jam Yahoo financial message boards with garbage so no one could comment on the management. The 4 or 5 posters (Yes, 4 or 5 full time posters JUST to jam Yahoo financial message boards) would talk about hockey ..beer...whatever and make it impossible to discuss the company. When the weekend or holiday showed up, the posts stopped ..only to resume on the next business day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom