No, fellas, I'm sorry, but I ran out of time and ambition for anymore tests for the forseeable future.
I didn't test those two because they are kind of relatively uncommon filters, and partly because they have ratings that are available. At least the EaO does and the RP does have efficincy info posted on this site from info via email from RP.
In fact, I can't even lay my hands on an RP filter.
I used the PureONE as kind of a "gold standard" because it is the highest efficiency off-the-shelf filter that has published data. So, I really wasn't trying to test filters (like the P1) with available info, but compare those that don't have info with those (like P1) that do so we can see which ones come closer to really good, and which are pretty far toward the worst.
Sort of make sense?