The question that has yet to be answered by all these videos:
Will it fire if you keep your finger off the trigger?
Sticking a peg, screw, nail, or whatever into the action is not the same as pressing the trigger - or just taking up slack - I am not defending SiG, here, and I don’t own a P320, but don’t go sticking stuff into the action and expect me to believe that is “equivalent” to a finger on the trigger.
Will the gun fire (via slide manipulation or whatever) if there is nothing pressing the trigger?
I think the conventional wisdom is that a full trigger pull should always fire the gun and anything other than that should never fire the gun.
I don't think the gun will fire unless the trigger has been partially pulled because there's a secondary safety that is immediately disengaged with the first little bit of pull.
I think it's the case that this is both a serious issue and that it's being overblown. I mean, it does take two concurrent manipulations to induce the AD.
My car is capable of driving into a telephone pole, that doesn't make it a design flaw per se. Four laws and strict observance of them and a P320 owner will never have anything worse than an interesting story.
If your holster partially pulls the trigger when the gun is fully seated within it and you point the gun at yourself (or allow it to be), things can go sideways sometimes.
One aspect of this that sort of infuriates me (as a former military leader) is how the senior leadership of the Air Force is pearl clutching in outrage at SIG when clearly they did no significant testing of their own when they fielded the firearm.
If the airman gets hurt using the gun YOU GAVE HIM AND REQUIRED HIM TO CARRY, how is that 100% on SIG and not at least hugely on the military leadership charged with organizing, training, and equipping the troops?
Where is the "buck stops here"? Where's the congressional hearings on the M17/M18 adoption process and the likely backroom deals that led to it?