That discharge is like a catchcan, designed to keep debris from building up overwhelmingly










P365 has no such issueWhen I was looking for a new carry option the sig p365 was very intriguing. Due to sigs issues of late I settled on s&w shield plus and am very very happy
I suspect this is due to liability and fear lawsuits due to the publicity surrounding the small number of published cases rather than actual experience.I carried the exact SIG P320 equipped with a red dot and night light in a polymer holster for the past 7 years. It shot well, and I never had an accidental discharge. Needless to say recently they were all traded for Glocks.
I am seeing more gun ranges post rules online and at the range prohibiting the P320 from being brought onto their property. Banned. No sale, trade, carry, shooting, or repair work on the P320 is allowed.
You’ve chosen a good gun.When I was looking for a new carry option the sig p365 was very intriguing. Due to sigs issues of late I settled on s&w shield plus and am very very happy
I know that the issue is a 320 issue and not a 365 issue. I guess it's the way sig has handled or should I say not handled the issue with the 320. Made me think that if I did have an issue with the 365 I was not confident that they would be there on the customer service end. I know they can make a really great firearm but customer service is important to me in the end.You’ve chosen a good gun.
I’m not sure you chose it for the right reasons.
The P365 doesn’t have any of the problems that the P320 does. It’s not a SIG issue, if there is even an issue at all, it is a P320 issue.
Here’s a great analysis on the subject, by Dr. Grande. Basically it’s a human error during holstering/unholstering, but they are putting the blame on the gun.