- Joined
- Nov 24, 2023
- Messages
- 192
Mandated ? No .
Green power needs 100% backup.Cuz we'll be using more and more green energy to power them. Plus battery technology will become much better.
All power sources need backup, right?Green power needs 100% backup.
Do nuke and coal plants have 100% back up?All power sources need backup, right?
100% backup? Not likely.Do nuke and coal plants have 100% back up?
Kwik trip has had a place to plug in since 2010.No, stop with all the Govt control. Let the market provide.
100% backup? Not likely.
Without exception, no source of electricity runs full time. Coal, nuclear and gas plants—or conventional resources—periodically experience unexpected outages, and they all need to be turned off periodically for routine maintenance.
Kwik trip has had a place to plug in since 2010.
Having a PHEV I always wished each pump would have an L2 EVSE that I could drop down and charge while pumping gas and dumping a load and grabbing a muncho.
Takes 20m-30m to do all 3.
Sadly too few PHEVs to justify
Before Wisconsin even had solar or Wind our utility went on a building spree of unnecessary taxpayer funded coal fired plants . We had 400% more installed power than we could use locally and exported power to Illinois, Minnesota even Canada.
The net effect of this has been a large and sustained increase in fixed fees and electrical costs to cover decommissioning “unnecessary” nuclear and hydro plants .
My local area Of 100,000 supplies power to 10’s of millions of people, before this mixup we had 95% of our local needs provided for by hydro with some of the cheapest fees and electrical in the country
and we’re still net exporters of power regionally, now we are crippled with decades of bonds funding the installation of excess power we can’t even use locally but get to suffer the extra pollution and bs making other peoples power, who don’t reimburse us for our expenditures.
There are consequences for eliminating 3rd party non-partisan government accountability boards.
All power sources need backup, right?
Ever think there is a reason people are declining the PHEVs? How about the pitfalls addressed by the manufacturers? Issues? ok, fix em. Then I may want to buy in. Entice me, the consumer not to push down my throat with inaccurate claims of saving the planet. Isn't that what other producers have to do?
So your answer is Gov't to the rescue? That is simply not the reality of how government often works. If the government was sincere it there be partnerships and we'd be developing infrastructure with corporate partners to have EV's charged while driving on highways or parking at supermarkets, malls, etc... Where's the supportive tech from govt? Future mandates but many seem unfunded.
And where are the legitimate conversations from social justice warriors who support EV's? Sourcing the necessary elements for EV manufacturing is an ugly word and that is being kind so not to raise ire of mods. Massive hypocrisy in my view. It's like dating a fierce feminist who then expects the man to pay the full bill for dinner. Where do you stand?
There is no need for oxygenates in modern fuel injected engines, the testing I’ve seen for their use is 4 decades old.Really? LOL! Do your homework before posting!
I work with MtBE daily. The rest of the world knows this and utilizes this. MtBE is the best oxygenate! The corn lobby and enviros took this best choice away from the consumer.
Sound familiar?
EVSEs and j-connectors are designed specifically to seal the contacts and eliminate sparking. Saying an EV sparks more than a spark ignition vehicle is silly.Electricity can spark causing a fire from fuel vapors or gas leak. EV's can catch fire starting more fires. Private business should be the one to decide if they want chargers or not. Government should not get involved.
Ever think there is a reason people are declining the PHEVs? How about the pitfalls addressed by the manufacturers? Issues? ok, fix em. Then I may want to buy in. Entice me, the consumer not to push down my throat with inaccurate claims of saving the planet. Isn't that what other producers have to do?
So your answer is Gov't to the rescue? That is simply not the reality of how government often works. If the government was sincere it there be partnerships and we'd be developing infrastructure with corporate partners to have EV's charged while driving on highways or parking at supermarkets, malls, etc... Where's the supportive tech from govt? Future mandates but many seem unfunded.
And where are the legitimate conversations from social justice warriors who support EV's? Sourcing the necessary elements for EV manufacturing is an ugly word and that is being kind so not to raise ire of mods. Massive hypocrisy in my view. It's like dating a fierce feminist who then expects the man to pay the full bill for dinner. Where do you stand?
Really? LOL! Do your homework before posting!I'm not really all that sure about ethanol mandates ever really being that critical. Especially in a place where there's a high demand for premium fuel. There is no more effective octane booster than 10% ethanol. Maybe 15% ethanol.
No, typical grid planning has contingency planned capacity (I'm sure @MVAR and @Shannow could provide some examples from their areas) which is the amount of instantaneous loss the grid can be expected to tolerate without going down. Here in Ontario, that capacity is 2x Darlington units, or roughly 1,800MW of ~13,000MW of nuclear capacity.Do nuke and coal plants have 100% back up?
You mean with widespread government mandates and widespread elimation of ICE vehicle choices?They will increasingly become more environmental and motorist friendly with widespread adoption.
PHES, arguably, has more utility than batteries because of the longer duration storage it provides. However, one must be careful in saying that it could be used to firm wind (which can be gone for weeks at a time) or solar, as the durations of non-generation associated with these sources tend to be much longer than the storage capacity of these facilities.I used to think that hydro storage was silly but it makes a lot of sense as either a backup and/or to “time shift” wind or solar. I understand that power plants need to operate at near peak for highest efficiency, so some power plants just go offline at night when demand is low.
Some of the backup is supposedly rather dirty sources.
Contingency reserves are part of the ancillary service market, part on the spin and non spin sections.No, typical grid planning has contingency planned capacity (I'm sure @MVAR and @Shannow could provide some examples from their areas) which is the amount of instantaneous loss the grid can be expected to tolerate without going down. Here in Ontario, that capacity is 2x Darlington units, or roughly 1,800MW of ~13,000MW of nuclear capacity.
Because there's no outage correlation with thermal plants, and aside from trips, outages are planned so that reserve capacity can be readied and brought online (and this is typically scheduled for periods where demand is going to be low and there's surplus capacity available) there is no need for huge amounts, let alone nameplate capacity, of backup supply.
On the other hand, since wind and solar are both highly correlated sources, you need full nameplate replacement capacity, as the situation in Alberta recently demonstrated, as you cannot rely on any of that capacity being firm supply. You can EXPECT a portion of it to show up, but you cannot RELY on it. This is why Alberta's entire grid can be powered by gas, despite having almost half that nameplate capacity available in wind, the same goes for Texas.
Really? LOL! Do your homework before posting!
I work with MtBE daily. The rest of the world knows this and utilizes this. MtBE is the best oxygenate! The corn lobby and enviros took this best choice away from the consumer.
Sound familiar?