Ruger RXM (Glock clone, sort of)

[Astro14]

In 2000 I had the honor of partaking in various small arms evaluations. Of these guns, to include the SCAR, and several others of the like. Basically it was a continuation of the OICW program which was somewhat previously mothballed.

We also tested several different shotguns, and semiauto handguns, to include the Glock 17.

Even back in 2000, a replacement for the M9 was being looked at. One of these reasons was the success of police departments with the ugly glock in service.

Modularity has been one of the requirements of military service for quite some time. 100% parts interchangeability at the armorer level. .... Which for whatever reason the Glock does not qualify for. I argue that if the M14 qualifies, then so does a Glock.

In regards to a standard issue sidearm, although a one size fits all deal does not work well with handguns, I dont see a unit armorer, at will, changing grips for a soldier who just does not like how it feels.

Pistols of course in the military are more reserved for Service purpose units, medics, pilots and MPs, standard line units dont get issued pistols. In special purpose units, typically you could carry whatever you wanted as long as it was on the approved list.

Gimmick? I think so. I mean gun makers would not be able to stay in business without the introduction of new stuff.

Will the Ruger be as good as the Glock? Maybe, and since thats what the question EVERYONE is asking themselves in the background, why not just stick with the OG?

Interesting points, all.

My military experience was quite different than yours, but, as a pilot, and later, with a TACRON (Tactical Air Control Squadron, that deploys with Marines), I carried my personal weapon a S&W 5906 in Desert Storm, then a 1911 (Issued by the USN) in Bosnia, then an M-11 (Sig P229 issued by the USN).

Of those, I thought the M-11 was the best choice.

Compact, so, it fits in flight gear (I had a custom holster made for the 5906, which I then used for the 1911) better than a full size, which didn’t fit in our gear of the 1990s.

No safety, just the decocker, so, like a Glock, it’s ready to go when drawn - nothing to remember/forget.

You can’t go wrong with a Glock, and I have recommended the G19 as a first gun, and all-around choice, many times in this forum.

But I see the “chassis” revolution as just that - a revolution. A revolution in how a “gun” is defined and a revolution in ease of adaptability.

I will be watching this Ruger closely.

 

[Robster]

I've also carried issued Glocks, and now carry (most of the time) a Glock 27 as my go-to EDC. I've admired the simplicity, reliability and engineering that Glock has done with their pistols, as many of you have noted. Before seeing this Ruger RXM, I couldn't really imagine any improvements to a Glock that I would have considered significant enough to make me take notice. I have plenty of handguns, so I probably won't buy one of the Rugers, but I'll give Ruger a tip of the hat for making significant improvements to a gun that heretofore I thought unimprovable by most measures.

 

[shortyb]

I like what I saw (and played with ). "Christmas Deal" according to PSA website, $399.

I bought it for a few reasons. First, I have no pistols machined for a reflex optic and always wanted one. Second, I like the idea of the modularity and ability to customize it to my liking. Third, I sold my G19 years ago and currently don't have a compact (yes, the G19 and G23 are both considered "compact" by Glock) Glock chambered in 9mm. Don't get me wrong, have plenty of Glocks (yes @dnewton3, all over the house ) and like them all just fine. This one, like my P320, allows me to make small tweaks and changes to give me exactly what I want. Right now, I like the matte gray color of the frame. Who knows, tomorrow I may want an OD green one. Being able to get one without having to Cerakote something really appeals to me. Or I may do what I do with several of my "ugly" ones and leave them as they came and just shoot the bejezuz out of them. Been using/owning Glocks since they came to the US. Was on the committee in 1988 to choose a semi-auto pistol for our dept. when transitioning from revolvers (yeah, I'm THAT old) and chose the "plastic" one over Sig, H&K, or S&W. We settled on the then new .40 S&W caliber and offered both the G22 and the G23 to our folks. Have carried a Glock in various calibers and sizes ever since and right up to my recent retirement. Been to every armorer school Glock offered and attended advanced armorer school at Smyrna twice, so I know my way around the pistols. I like what I see there too, and likely won't change my mind simply because something new and shiny comes along. I rotate my carry guns based on what I'm doing and where I'm going. Or if I feel it's a Glock day or a Shield Plus day. This gives me another choice, and as they say, variety is the spice of life.

Will be doing a full strip down, cleaning, and lubing before sending any lead downrange so stand by for a more in-depth review. Got a Holosun HS407A3 for an optic and look forward to messing around with that too. Merry Christmas to me.

 

[Robster]

Be sure to let us know how it works out for you! Congrats on the new gun!

 

[dnewton3]

Of the few YT reviews I've seen online, the RXM is getting some very positive notes and generally finding favor with those who handle/shoot them. I doubt I'd buy one, but I'd sure be curious just to try one.

 

[Rand]

rangeusa has it for 360 currently code handgun10