Don't laugh. It's been thought of.Maybe in the near future the folks in charge will see the crazy amount of money sitting in Roths and pass some silly law and have an ‘IRS distribution fee’ cause that money is no longer taxed ?![]()
Alicia Munnell, who had been appointed to a high-level job in the Treasury Department, proposed nearly 30 years ago taking 15% from retirement accounts. Her reasoning was that not everyone could invest in 401(k)s and IRAs, and we should tax those fortunate enough to have those accounts to reduce the deficits and to invest in infrastructure for "our future"—the kids.
She went further than the one-time 15% levy by actually proposing that annual gains in retirement accounts should be taxed as regular income then, not deferred. Imagine your IRA growing by $10,000 one year, but you have to pay (say) 25% of that when you file your taxes for the year, even though you might not be able to touch the money in the account. She subscribed to the theory that any income exempted from tax is actually a type of government tax expenditure itself. Your receiving a $1,000 tax break was the same in her eyes as the government paying you $1,000.
The Wall Street Journal and others blew the whistle on her schemes then and kept them from passing. But consider what I mentioned in another post about the proposal to make 529s just another taxable savings account. The same "justifications" were given.
That mentality is out there, folks. Keep in mind the Roth variants of IRAs and 401(k)s came along later. Who knows what someone could dream up for those.