Passport and CR-V rear seat leg room are about the same, FYI.Congrats!
Since you like Honda, mid 30s gets you into Passport or Pilot territory. As stated above if you're considering more than 1 child it pays to plan ahead.
I had a 2014 CX-5 Touring, and loved it. I sat in a Toureg. I'm 6'1", and it was too small for me.I do not have experience with the Tiguan directly and don't intend to divert the direction of this thread if that's your primary goal.
But anytime I see a thread about a family vehicle with a budget in the $30k ballpark, I have to voice the opinion to check out Mazda. They're often overlooked and the CX-5 truly continues to be an excellent vehicle.
You are partially correct about the 2GR-FKS. It uses the dual port and direct D-4S injection system, and it uses the simulated on-demand Atkinson cycle. It is not a true Atkinson cycle engine as it operates in Otto cycle much of the time and it switches to the highly efficient simulated Atkinson cycle during light throttle steady-state cruising (where the closing of intake valves is delayed to effectively increase the expansion ratio to improve efficiency).2GR-FKS is direct injection, Atkinson cycle. Torque is pushed higher and has very narrow torque band.
Touareg? Maybe felt smaller. But, only one of those teo will be comfortable on long trips, and it is Touareg.I had a 2014 CX-5 Touring, and loved it. I sat in a Toureg. I'm 6'1", and it was too small for me.
Really didn’t dwell into details. It is underwhelming engine and feels weaker than 2GR-FE.You are partially correct about the 2GR-FKS. It uses the dual port and direct D-4S injection system, and it uses the simulated on-demand Atkinson cycle. It is not a true Atkinson cycle engine as it operates in Otto cycle much of the time and it uses the highly efficient simulated Atkinson cycle during light throttle steady-state cruising (where the closing of intake valves is delayed to effectively increase the expansion ratio to improve efficiency).
You just like, and are used-to, turbocharged engines edy. Their very wide torque band can be addictive. The 2GR-FKS (and most other NA engines) can seem underwhelming by comparison. I get it.Really didn’t dwell into details. It is underwhelming engine and feels weaker than 2GR-FE.
I know it is dual injection though.
Nah. My BMW is NA, though torque is 2,750-5,000rpm.You just like, and are used-to, turbocharged engines edy. Their very wide torque band can be addictive. The 2GR-FKS (and most other NA engines) can seem underwhelming by comparison. I get it.
But, your BMW has a manual transmission. It is much easier to keep the engine in it's optimal torque range with a manual. By comparison, the automatic in the Sienna is calibrated to upshift at the earliest opportunity, and to hold it in the higher gears longer to achieve the highest fuel mileage possible. This characteristic is pretty common now days. It can also be infuriating when you ask for power and it won't downshift unless you floor it. This kind of shift programing makes it seem like the vehicle is underpowered.Nah. My BMW is NA, though torque is 2,750-5,000rpm.
It is underwhelming bcs. heavy vehicle, torque at 4,700rpm. It is better suited for 86 or Lexus IS350, not minivan. That is an issue. 2GR-FE has wider torque band although it is 20lb-ft less. In real world feels more dynamic.
I am aware of all that. And BMW’s come with automatic.But, your BMW has a manual transmission. It is much easier to keep the engine in it's optimal torque range with a manual. By comparison, the automatic in the Sienna is calibrated to upshift at the earliest opportunity, and to hold it in the higher gears longer to achieve the highest fuel mileage possible. This characteristic is pretty common now days. It can also be infuriating when you ask for power and it won't downshift unless you floor it. This kind of shift programing makes it seem like the vehicle is underpowered.
One big thing about minivans is utility too.when our two sons were little we had a nissan sentra station wagon. minivans seem bloated to me. it’s too bad that station wagons are dead. the buick envision looks decent if in this situation these days.
So, let me get this straight, you are commenting on the performance of an engine that you don't even have? That being the case, what makes you an authority on whether or not this engine is a dud?I am aware of all that. And BMW’s come with automatic.
I got Sienna before this BMW. I skipped purposely 2GR-FKS. It is dud. And yes, transmission programming doesn’t help. But then, 6 speed is also programmed to downshift at earliest opportunity. Atlas has same 8 speed transmission and yet VR6 pulls hard from basement of rpms.
99% of Sienna owners doesn’t care about this. It is just my observation.
It doesn’t. Same like it doesn’t make you how BMW drives.So, let me get this straight, you are commenting on the performance of an engine that you don't even have? That being the case, what makes you an authority on whether or not this engine is a dud?
Great point. Minivan FTW.Yeah you're not thinking about this now but in 5 years when your kid's helping him/herself in and out of the car, in parking lots, you'd like the sliding minivan door. Kids love slamming regular doors open into the next vehicle over.