Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Filter efficiency is directly and primarily controlled by the media, but not the amount of media. The velocity of flow has a small effect on it and my recollection of the primary material I read about it years back was that lower velocity tended to nudge the efficieny up. As I recall, it was by a negligible amount but I am not standing on my memory about that.
When comparing the same media, more media area with a constant flow means less flow velocity through the media, which means less delta-p. I can see efficiency going up a bit due to the media's ability to hold captured particles better with less delta-p trying to dislodge those trapped particles. Kind of goes back to the Purolator/Mann+Hummel graph showing the efficiency slowly dropping with increased filter loading.
Filter efficiency is directly and primarily controlled by the media, but not the amount of media. The velocity of flow has a small effect on it and my recollection of the primary material I read about it years back was that lower velocity tended to nudge the efficieny up. As I recall, it was by a negligible amount but I am not standing on my memory about that.
When comparing the same media, more media area with a constant flow means less flow velocity through the media, which means less delta-p. I can see efficiency going up a bit due to the media's ability to hold captured particles better with less delta-p trying to dislodge those trapped particles. Kind of goes back to the Purolator/Mann+Hummel graph showing the efficiency slowly dropping with increased filter loading.