Who is making you stage the house?I have to stage the house myself
Personally I wouldn't buy a house that's occupied or staged.
Who is making you stage the house?I have to stage the house myself
There it is, it already exists and why nothing better has been developed. How much cheaper can it get? To have personal representation, 24 hours a day, marketing and representing your home for sale until the day it sells....
I am not one for government interference in the free market but it sure seems like the private companies aren't stepping up to the plate and offering better choices in how to sell a home.
Doesn't matter to you, someone else would.Who is making you stage the house?
Personally I wouldn't buy a house that's occupied or staged.
I think your ex wife is semi professional so she can use her connection to get things done. However for most typical casual buyers and sellers they may run into problems on paperwork and checking, negotiation, etc. My parents used to be real estate agents in another country and they work till midnight closing deals all the time, and very often negotiation falls through or buyers couldn't get a loan without help from the right banks, etc. Very often we found sellers wanting to keep certain expensive items for their new homes (in the US it would be curtains, certain appliances, etc) and the buyers want to be compensated for a huge amount, and in the end one of the agents compensate the difference in cash back to the buyers to make them happy.The cost to the seller to sell a home is not minimal. Especially when the seller can expect to fork over $60,000 in commissions to his agent and the agent of the buyer.
Prior to my divorce my ex-wife and I decided to do a For Sale By Owner. She was a mortgage lender for a major bank and had a lot of industry contacts with whom she could call in a few favors and help us with the legal paperwork and other things for a very small fee or no cost at all.
Boy, the agents in my town about lost their minds.I can't count how many phone calls we got from agents wanting to argue with us about why they should get the listing and how many came to our open houses pretending to be potential buyers and then revealing themselves. I had to show many the door and almost grabbed one pencil necked weasel and physically removed him from the premises.
In the future I will either negotiate a lower rate with an agent, and of course I fully expect their cartel like collusion to make that a difficult task, or I will use a discount broker and refuse to sign any contract longer than the average time on market. If that discount broker is a lazy and ineffective agent like the last one I engaged he'll be cancelled quickly. If more people resisted the status quo we'd see some changes in the traditional and outdated commission structures.
So you are saying you didn’t sell your last home by yourself and you needed an agent?The cost to the seller to sell a home is not minimal. Especially when the seller can expect to fork over $60,000 in commissions to his agent and the agent of the buyer.
Prior to my divorce my ex-wife and I decided to do a For Sale By Owner. She was a mortgage lender for a major bank and had a lot of industry contacts with whom she could call in a few favors and help us with the legal paperwork and other things for a very small fee or no cost at all.
Boy, the agents in my town about lost their minds.I can't count how many phone calls we got from agents wanting to argue with us about why they should get the listing and how many came to our open houses pretending to be potential buyers and then revealing themselves. I had to show many the door and almost grabbed one pencil necked weasel and physically removed him from the premises.
In the future I will either negotiate a lower rate with an agent, and of course I fully expect their cartel like collusion to make that a difficult task, or I will use a discount broker and refuse to sign any contract longer than the average time on market. If that discount broker is a lazy and ineffective agent like the last one I engaged he'll be cancelled quickly. If more people resisted the status quo we'd see some changes in the traditional and outdated commission structures.
This. I sell all my homes without an agent and it's a bit more work because agents will not even show the property to a client that has retained them. It's a little more work selling myself but saving 6% of 500K makes it worthwhile, and I can price the home lower to entice a buyer. Last two I sold myself were in contract within 14 days.The problem I see is there is little incentive by both agents to spend a lot of time with the sale. The more money the agent makes, the higher attention which will be spent on the transaction.
It’s great to have choices!This. I sell all my homes without an agent and it's a bit more work because agents will not even show the property to a client that has retained them. It's a little more work selling myself but saving 6% of 500K makes it worthwhile, and I can price the home lower to entice a buyer. Last two I sold myself were in contract within 14 days.
When you lower the price by 1/2 of what a commission would be it makes perfect sense ( 6% of a 500K sale is 30,000......do the math). My last home got into a bidding war and it sold at what would have been the price with a commission, so I made almost an extra 30K by lowering the price with no agent. All you need to do is pay a lawyer, which you would have had to do anyway.Thats brilliant, under price your home just to save a few bucks? How does that make sense at all?
Huh? So I have to move out, buy and new house, and move into it before you're willing to make a deal? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?Who is making you stage the house?
Personally I wouldn't buy a house that's occupied or staged.
My thought is if the house is occupied it's a good indication of how well the home owner kept the property. Kind of like looking at a private party used car vs a used car from car max where all the "evidence" has been washed away.Who is making you stage the house?
Personally I wouldn't buy a house that's occupied or staged.
I've purchased several occupied houses and it was never hard to envision where things would go and what changes I wanted to make. It just takes a little imagination.My thought is if the house is occupied it's a good indication of how well the home owner kept the property. Kind of like looking at a private party used car vs a used car from car max where all the "evidence" has been washed away.
But I can see your point, you want to see the "blank canvas" that you're going to be working with. That makes sense.
Most likely yes. I can't properly inspect a house that's occupied. Plus I don't have to worry about when the previous people are going to leave.Huh? So I have to move out, buy and new house, and move into it before you're willing to make a deal? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
I'm surprised since that takes a lot of potentially great homes off your list. It has been the rare house I've looked at that wasn't occupied. To each their own!Most likely yes. I can't properly inspect a house that's occupied. Plus I don't have to worry about when the previous people are going to leave.
Possibly so. I wouldn't sell my house until it's empty either.I'm surprised since that takes a lot of potentially great homes off your list. It has been the rare house I've looked at that wasn't occupied. To each their own!
It's just that most people can't afford to do that...I certainly can't.Possibly so. I wouldn't sell my house until it's empty either.