It wont, it's just media fluff to make a story sound good.This news all came out less than a week after I signed my contract with my realtor.. It will be interesting to see how much the commission goes down in real life.
It wont, it's just media fluff to make a story sound good.This news all came out less than a week after I signed my contract with my realtor.. It will be interesting to see how much the commission goes down in real life.
Since you asked the question.This is my issue with the whole situation.
What did the realtor do in those hours your house was listed for sale? How much work did the realtor do after the sale? Pretty sure it's a bunch of template / form stuff that takes a few hours but not $14k worth of labor / resources. It's cut and paste. How much heavy lifting did the title agency do? Nothing personal, I'm just on a rampage against the industry lol.
In the future you could do the same by paying $100 to have your home listed on MLS. Everyone will come banging on your door even without a realtor in almost any market now. Step 2, hire an attorney for the contract stuff. An attorney won't charge $14k.
Will it be as easy as I say it is? IDK, stay tuned.
Agree. To me it’s a stupid extension that someone is going to ask for x% less due to a marginally lower commission… and that this is going to magically fix the home affordability issues for people.It wont, it's just media fluff to make a story sound good.
Of just use Redfin which charges less than 6% already. Or use a flat fee listing. I've done it.Wait until July. The 6% commission is going away.
Home prices could go down now that the biggest group of real-estate agents agreed to lower commissions
The National Association of Realtors said it would pay $418 million in damages to settle lawsuits that claimed the NAR kept commissions unfairly high.www.businessinsider.com
I don't expect them not to have a commission, but 6% is egregious in my view and many others.Since you asked the question.
The answer is, why do you think someone is going to show your house and not get paid? Close to 90% of buyers use an agent.
The second question you asked.
How do you know how much it cost any business other than your own to run and pay the bills?
I agree, my case will be an outlier because I presume most investors / landlord prefer out of pocket FSBO deals. They are cost conscious to begin with, it's the nature of being a land lord, and dealing with these guys is going to be tough negotiating I presume. I like negotiating though, I've been borderline kicked out of car dealerships and I know what I have here. A high quality house, turn key operation, and I presume it will sell itself and generate a lot of interest. We'll see!BTW I would expect in your case to have maybe an easy sale, more so your not sure how to price it and like you say, its a depressed area and many savvy investors buy up properties like that at the snap of a finger and pay cash too. Investors love depressed areas.
I cant even warp my head around an area where a home sells for that price. Heck my first small home that needed lots of work 40 years ago was that price.
Thank you, I appreciate it. I know I might have gone a little scorched earth on the profession and don't mean to offend anyone in the industry. It's mostly my ignorance and napkin math assumption of the process. Maybe I'll be right, or get lucky, or end up finding a realtor?Truly good luck.
Just so you know, I’m not offended and I’m not in the industry and I haven’t been in a long time now.I don't expect them not to have a commission, but 6% is egregious in my view and many others.
"Americans have long paid unusually high commissions to real estate agents. The typical commission in the U.S. has been almost 6 percent, compared with 4.5 percent in Germany, 2.5 percent in Australia and 1.3 percent in Britain. As a recent headline in The Wall Street Journal put it, “Almost no one pays a 6 percent real-estate commission — except Americans.”"
The Realtors’ Big Defeat
A settlement in the real estate industry is a case study of a central flaw in free-market economic theory.www.nytimes.com
Showing a house a few times is not a complicated high skill task, I hate to be gruff about it but I don't see the value of doing that and charging $100's / hr. Sure they need to get paid. If this wasn't an issue then why is there a massive settlement and now the DOJ is getting involved? People are tired of paying too much.
I don't and I'm trying to reverse engineer the system with my little experience on the topic and then recreate it as a DIY project. I'll let everyone know what I find out.
From being involved in managerial levels in other businesses it appears the main cost is employees here. The employees may have 4 year degrees and pay some RE licensing exams. I presume these exams are difficult but not bar / medical exam difficult.
What other costs are there, a CRM for managing prospects, building space? Basic office stuff.
What I'm saying is there is a lot of fluff and I hate to say, unnecessary profit / markup, which is what all the recent outrage appears to me for. Maybe it's worth it for some but to me it's too much.
If someone can itemize, even very briefly, the costs of selling a house, I am open to that. The actual numbers behind a sale and the profit margin.
I agree, my case will be an outlier because I presume most investors / landlord prefer out of pocket FSBO deals. They are cost conscious to begin with, it's the nature of being a land lord, and dealing with these guys is going to be tough negotiating I presume. I like negotiating though, I've been borderline kicked out of car dealerships and I know what I have here. A high quality house, turn key operation, and I presume it will sell itself and generate a lot of interest. We'll see!
Thank you, I appreciate it. I know I might have gone a little scorched earth on the profession and don't mean to offend anyone in the industry. It's mostly my ignorance and napkin math assumption of the process. Maybe I'll be right, or get lucky, or end up finding a realtor?
I figure if I can't pull this off myself, then what am I good for, is it that hard? It's not like I'm going into a match to play Andre Agassi.
Us BITOGs take on mechanical projects that push the limits of our experience and skill. To me, this is one of them, just in a different field.
As I posted in the Zillow thread: "I've been calling multiple agents to see if I can negotiate this magical negotiable rate and everyone is sticking to their guns saying 6% or maaaybe 5.5%. It's a monopoly and you guys know it."The number 6% is used for dramatic purposes. I would think it might be that on lower priced homes, but I have no idea.
I have not seen 6% commissions in the New York metropolitan area since around the year 2000 and in fact the 4.5% media report your quoting for Germany is very typical.
That doesn’t matter real estate is a service pay whatever you want or whatever you don’t want. Truly and I mean this all good
This the biggest story that has come out on this topic in years in my view. Realtor laws and regulations have never made it to MSM headlines from my daily observations, which is why I am talking about this and realize the grift.As far as the media, I don’t care what they say, happens in the rest of the world as I assume it’s been the same for the last 50 years. We love to quote the media when it fits our side of an argument that we’re trying to create that goes for anything and any topic.
Since the Internet there is a media story for any topic that you want to choose
Major metro area / warzone.It sounds like you really in a rural area vs where people in metropolitan areas, severely limit their showings when not listed with a broker.
Are the realtors advocating for the buyer here by showing them all homes for sale or are they protecting the agencies profits and going for the home run deals? If FSBOs are so rare then can't the realtor use their superior negotiating skills and education to work a deal out in favor of everyone?If you read my previous post, the agents have the buyers, buyers do not want to go around and talk to 4, 8 or 12 homeowners, some of which are dishonest or have something to hide. The buyers see the homeowners as the sales people and just imagine the dredge of them every week lining up all the homes they want to see which of for sale by owner only knowing they will have to talk to each and everyone of them and tell them what a great house they have so they can get out the door and move onto the next.
I will have a real estate attorney draft up documents. Property for sale as is and all the legalese that goes with it.It's legal to sell your own property but you have to ask if you're willing to bear 100% of potential liability if/when the buyer decides to sue you, for anything whatsoever, before or after the close of escrow? Most, but not all, "Realtors" (keep in mind not everyone who holds a real estate license is a "Realtor") carry E&O (Errors and Omissions) insurance to not only protect themselves, but you as well against potential lawsuits.
Since you're going through this process ..."mostly for the principal and the challenge"..., you have to ask yourself if you're willing to take the risk of potential litigation?
I'll wait them out, it's a hot market.When you sell a house yourself, you're not "saving" any money. The buyer(s) know you're not paying a commission, and they factor that into their offer.
What difference in work and effort considering a 1 week sale in a hot market does the agent do with selling a $130k home and $500k home? The demand is there, it's not 2008.Let's use your example of $130K sales price. IF you paid the "typical" 6% commission (for all real estate agents involved), that would be $7,800. Now split that between both real estate offices, and escrow would send them a check for $3,900. Each agent working for an office doesn't get to keep that $3,900 because they have a commission "split" agreement with their office, which (typically) ranges from 55%-80%). Let's use the best case of 80% here. That means that agent would get paid $3,120 for the transaction. If they're e new agent who likely doesn't have that lucrative agreement with their office, they may get $2,145 (55% of $3,900).
The guy was supposedly an expert in that market, maybe he is familiar with comps or he's just talking out of his muffler, doesn't matter. I had the appraisal done recently and we'll see what the numbers come back as."The estate attorneys real estate agent nosed in on the deal and said the property is worth $130k after driving by the house"...130K?...where did they come up with that figure? From their Ouija Board? Without looking at comparable sales? Without even looking at the property? That's laughable for an agent to make statements like that and does disservice to agents who do things correctly.
I'll be hiring an attorney.Make sure to get up to speed on disclosure laws in your state.
So what is your idea of a solution?As I posted in the Zillow thread: "I've been calling multiple agents to see if I can negotiate this magical negotiable rate and everyone is sticking to their guns saying 6% or maaaybe 5.5%. It's a monopoly and you guys know it."
That's what every commission sales position is like. Its not for everyone, that is for sure.I tried selling real estate when I was a lot younger. FWIW the commission was 6% no negotiating in small town Pa. I soon found it wasn't for me, I discovered I need to be paid for hours worked to be comfortable and feel useful and that's not how RE works. My take-away was that what you made on a sale whether you sold a property or listed a property that got sold by another agent covered the time you spent chasing leads, networking, taking photos, doing showings that didn't result in a sale, office time, etc. that didn't generate a dollar of income. The seller paid me for time not spent on his sale. Just how it was and how it is still I imagine.
As I posted in the Zillow thread: "I've been calling multiple agents to see if I can negotiate this magical negotiable rate and everyone is sticking to their guns saying 6% or maaaybe 5.5%. It's a monopoly and you guys know it."
It's not a monopoly at all. Like I pointed out, in California it has been part of the standard California Association of Realtors contract for decades the line that reads ..."commissions are not set by law and are negotiable..." I can't speak to how the other states real estate contracts read, but that's what California is like. The fact that the local agents don't want to budge on commissions is typical. Selling Real Estate for a living is a very litigious climate and you, as an individual, have to weigh your risk versus reward for making a living.
My personal solution is to DIY, FSBO, or a discount broker.Curious to hear what your solution would be?
In no way am I looking at regulated pricing, that's an un-American slippery slope.Would you like your company or the company of people you know or anyone in this forum to have the government set a price that they have to sell their products and services for and determine where those products can be displayed, and sold?
There's a variety of car manufacturers, I can choose one that is cheaper, but in the world of real estate, most companies won't budge.Why is it when I go to buy a product? Let’s say a Chevrolet traverse wherever I go in the country. General Motors puts the price of the product on the car i that I must pay is that a monopoly too?
I'm cost conscious and if I go with a realtor, I'll find a discount broker. I don't see the value of using a realtor in a hot market.I’m curious to hear your point of view because all all I read in your posts is you want people to work for you at a price you determine.
To me that isn't worth a $40,000 commission, which is why I'd rather DIY and save $10's of thousands.My take-away was that what you made on a sale whether you sold a property or listed a property that got sold by another agent covered the time you spent chasing leads, networking, taking photos, doing showings that didn't result in a sale, office time, etc. that didn't generate a dollar of income
Yep, if the neighbor doesn't want to play ball I'll have a sign made in addition to MLS.Put a sign out front. Wait for a flipper. Flippers and wholesalers LOVE duplexes in low rent neighborhoods. Sure, they'll heeem and haaaw at what you want, but you ain't in a hurry.
I see your point, kind of boxes out FSBOs because they can be dicey, but is the buyer ever told this property exists or are they left in the dark, especially if it meets their criteria?As an agent, you have to weigh your risks versus reward carefully before deciding on that you think is a fair commission.