Re-Looking at Amsoil for problem engines.(Ford Ecoboost and GM 5.3/6.2)

@Glenda W. So, either buy cheap and change more often for most OTS oils (not all; mind you) OR buy boutique and give yourself more options; such as better overall performance in more severe conditions (i.e. extended OCIs)?

Seems pretty straight forward and why boutiques would; in part, charge more?

Hmm. Imagine that.
 
@Glenda W. So, either buy cheap and change more often for most OTS oils (not all; mind you) OR buy boutique and give yourself more options; such as better overall performance in more severe conditions (i.e. extended OCIs)?

Seems pretty straight forward and why boutiques would; in part, charge more?

Hmm. Imagine that.
Not to mention cleaner oil control rings at any oci!
 
it’s like buddy didn’t even watch the video in question. 😂
I admit that I didn’t watch. Those videos trigger spontaneous Tourette’s alternating with maniacal laughter. It’s quite concerning for unsuspecting bystanders around me. My support group recommends I stay away from those things that trigger those behaviors.
 
@Glenda W. So, either buy cheap and change more often for most OTS oils (not all; mind you) OR buy boutique and give yourself more options; such as better overall performance in more severe conditions (i.e. extended OCIs)?

Seems pretty straight forward and why boutiques would; in part, charge more?

Hmm. Imagine that.
In the big picture, you’re trading a slight increase in upfront costs for longer and fewer service intervals, without sacrificing protection, and also generating significantly less waste oil and filters.

For people who DIY this is a valid route to investigate; for those too busy to bother or those who physically can’t do their changes and have to pay someone, WM top shelf from majors are a great alternative other than shorter intervals.
 
Prove to me where engines have failed due to using Amsoil.

I’ll wait.

You believe something Lake posted that is not supported by the context of the information that was presented. Nor do you demonstrate the ability to understand the meaning of single, basic UOAs. Once again, a lack of understanding context of things. Stop your narration while claiming to stand on science, yet providing no proof of your own.

Here is one case but I overall agree with your point.
 
As far as using a UOA to compare oils based on wear. Blackstone says there is no statistical difference in wear between brands. That includes conventional, syn blend, and synthetic. The real differences are in engine/piston cleanliness, shear stability, and oxidation resistance etc. for longer oci’s.

View attachment 281190

View attachment 281191

View attachment 281192
Now that’s an intelligent response to have me say that interesting and I learned something new. Very professional response. Not some juvenile sophomoric response. Thanks
 
Annual oil changes with Amsoil. And it sludged and had cam wear. Am I misremembering what happened?
That’s what was told. Even the OP stated he didn’t intend to indicate it was related to the Amsoil. Apparently, those VCM enabled engines are notoriously hard on the oil. Incorrect maintenance coupled with a trouble prone engine, is a bad combination. Amsoil just catching strays with that example, not the true source of the problem; even if the description was true.
 
Annual oil changes with Amsoil. And it sludged and had cam wear. Am I misremembering what happened?
That's an engine that likes to sludge itself up and burn huge amounts of oil (as discussed in the thread), it is an application that is incredibly hard on oil and it should never have been running 1-year/15,000 mile intervals. Trav was able to keep them clean doing short intervals on a Euro LL oil like M1 FS 0W-40, which is an oil capable of, and approved for, extended drains in a plethora of applications.

On one hand, I don't think it's unreasonable to point out that the oil didn't hold up for that interval length, given what it's advertised to do, but on the other, there's a history of that engine destroying oils on FAR shorter intervals, and ending up even uglier, so 🤷‍♂️
 
That's an engine that likes to sludge itself up and burn huge amounts of oil (as discussed in the thread), it is an application that is incredibly hard on oil and it should never have been running 1-year/15,000 mile intervals. Trav was able to keep them clean doing short intervals on a Euro LL oil like M1 FS 0W-40, which is an oil capable of, and approved for, extended drains in a plethora of applications.

On one hand, I don't think it's unreasonable to point out that the oil didn't hold up for that interval length, given what it's advertised to do, but on the other, there's a history of that engine destroying oils on FAR shorter intervals, and ending up even uglier, so 🤷‍♂️
Yeah, the OCI just pushed the Amsoil too far. I doubt any oil would’ve been up to that task given what we know about the context of the application in question. Trav first hand goes up two grades and still cuts the intervals way down. Just simply not a viable candidate for extended drains.
 
No it didn’t
Just kind of interesting that "there are no Amsoil failures," and when one is pointed out, when someone changes it according to Amsoil's recommendations (annual or every 25,000 miles), well, that one doesn't count, etc etc. J series engine is a good engine.
 
Here's another example:
https://www.odyclub.com/threads/camshaft-failures.356574/

There's also another one from The Critic:

Just to underscore that this pair of issues isn't specific to AMSOIL.
 
Just kind of interesting that "there are no Amsoil failures," and when one is pointed out, when someone changes it according to Amsoil's recommendations (annual or every 25,000 miles), well, that one doesn't count, etc etc. J series engine is a good engine.
VCM really was not good.

Single incident, anecdotal and not well documented do not science or truth make - especially when the failure manifestation appears almost (no proof) not related to oil bottle name.
 
VCM really was not good.

Single incident, anecdotal and not well documented do not science or truth make - especially when the failure manifestation appears almost (no proof) not related to oil bottle name.
Exactly. Not all engines are capable of extended drains. There was a mechanical / design related problem with the engine and the owner extended the interval blindly; yet Amsoil is supposed to take the fall for it? Is Amsoil supposed to come out and tell someone if they have an engine with design problems then don’t extend the interval? That’s the owner’s negligence for blindly extending the interval. The example isn’t severe service, it’s an outlier of extreme use. It’s akin to regular tracking of the oil and then still using it for extended OCIs. In other words, off label / outside the scope of Amsoil’s recommendations.
 
Last edited:
VCM really was not good.

Single incident, anecdotal and not well documented do not science or truth make - especially when the failure manifestation appears almost (no proof) not related to oil bottle name.
Yeah to be clear, I'm not saying that a different oil would have done better. So it seems like it's an oil related failure to me, and Amsoil was in the sump.

Exactly. Not all engines are capable of extended drains. There was a mechanical / design related problem with the engine and the owner extended the interval blindly; yet Amsoil is supposed to take the fall for it? Is Amsoil supposed to come out and tell someone if they have an engine with design problems then don’t extend the interval? That’s the owner’s negligence for blindly extending the interval. The example isn’t severe service, it’s an outlier of extreme use. It’s akin to regular tracking of the oil and then still using it for extended OCIs. In other words, off label / outside the scope of Amsoil’s recommendations.
I'm not sure it's negligence. He followed Amsoil's recommendations. And it failed.

Maybe Amsoil should say 1 year/25,000 miles*

*except in Honda J series engines with VCM.

Is that what you guys are saying?
 
Yeah to be clear, I'm not saying that a different oil would have done better. So it seems like it's an oil related failure to me, and Amsoil was in the sump.


I'm not sure it's negligence. He followed Amsoil's recommendations. And it failed.

Maybe Amsoil should say 1 year/25,000 miles*

*except in Honda J series engines with VCM.

Is that what you guys are saying?
I think any oil with a mileage promise, be it Castrol Edge with their 25K, Mobil 1 EP...etc would have all crapped the bed in a similar fashion in this application. This is the risk with just running extended drain intervals without detailed knowledge as to the suitability of your application or performing oil analysis.

The Critic's other thread shows the spec conventional oil, run at the spec interval failing just as badly, so even going by the OEM's own standards for lubricant selection and OCI duration, you still end up in the same place.
 
Back
Top Bottom