I'm not sure I agree. I'm not seeing how that is bad, to have a tire that "sees" a disproportionate amount of time at one corner. If the goal is to rotate before an appreciable amount of difference in wear occurs, then does it matter if one tire "saw" more time at one corner than the rest? As long as all four wear evenly and (hopefully) go to tread warranty, does it really matter?
From what I can tell, I do 6 to 8 rotations on a set of tires, and generally get nice even wear. Then again, I guess I don't give them a chance to wear badly--but that was my goal in the first place. If I replace a set after six rotations, it's because they are worn out--but all four look the same.
From what I can tell, I do 6 to 8 rotations on a set of tires, and generally get nice even wear. Then again, I guess I don't give them a chance to wear badly--but that was my goal in the first place. If I replace a set after six rotations, it's because they are worn out--but all four look the same.