That really grinds my gears when companies "recommend" their products for service categories they shouldn't, it's probably a decent MB229.3 replacement but not MB229.5, it's like multi-vehicle transmission fluid that says it's good to use in place of Allison TES-389 and TES-295 when they should just say TES-389 not both TES-389 and TES-295, because 389 is compatible in most TES-295 application but at a shorter interval, and very few if any multi-vehicle transmission fluids are actually to the caliber of TES-295 so they shouldn't list it as compatible.The Krypton is advertising MB 229.5 performance level, but lists a NOACK over 10.