Oil change intervals for a rarely-driven vehicle

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
401
Location
Largo, FL
Here's another reminder for you all to change oil in your infrequently driven vehicles according to time and not mileage:

Vehicle: 1985 Volvo 245 DL
Oil: Mobil-1 Tri Syn 10W-30
Miles on Vehicle: 217,747
Miles on Oil: 2,150
Time on Oil: 18 months

Al: 1
Cr: 0
Fe: 4
Cu: 8
Pb: 138
Sb: 0
Mo: 4
Ni: 0
Mn: 0
Ag: 0
Ti: 0
K: 0
B: 0
Si: 27
Na: 3
Ca: 1,945
Mg: 32
P: 342
Zn: 815
Ba: 0
SUS Visc: 55.7
Flashpoint: 375
Fuel: Antifreeze: 0
Water: 0
Insolubles 0.6

This vehicle is a candidate for an Auto-RX treatment, which is probably what I'll do next. It's getting driven a bit more now than it was, and I'll follow up the Auto-RX with a shorter interval and another UOA to see where things are.

I've already read here and heard elsewhere that a thinner synthetic like Mobil-1 is probably not the best choice for an infrequently driven vehicle or a vehicle that spends time in storage, and that a 15W-40 diesel truck oil would be more appropriate. Since I'm already using Chevron Delo in another vehicle, that's probably what I'll switch this one to.
 
I thought infrequent use would increase the Iron content. I wonder where all the lead and silicon came from?
 
High lead with low copper is strange. I always see silicon go up with infrequent use. The crankcase is not a sealed system and dust gets into everything eventually.
 
If it were me, I'd retest. I'd want a little more evidence than one cheapy $20 oil analysis before I ran to the bank. Mistakes are made.

A TBN reading would be nice, especially in these conditions. I doubt a low TBN results in high Pb though. More than likely, a low TBN would give high Fe numbers.
 
quote:

Originally posted by satterfi:
If it were me, I'd retest. I'd want a little more evidence than one cheapy $20 oil analysis before I ran to the bank. Mistakes are made.

A TBN reading would be nice, especially in these conditions. I doubt a low TBN results in high Pb though. More than likely, a low TBN would give high Fe numbers.


I totally agree. The Phosphorus is not right . I wonder about the lead. And the Iron seems too low. I have very little confidence in this analysis.
frown.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top