Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Loaded??!? Lol.
Your standards may not be as high as mine when it comes to keeping a car's finish. Again, who are you to mandate what is good enough?
I think you need to ask this of yourself.You seem to have a mandate against coal.
I ask you this.Where do you think electricty comes from? The vast majority comes from coal and there is no plausible alternative in the foreseeable future,regardless of what the EPA and others that promote these things might say.
I live in a state that coal is almost the only source of electricty and I have never had a problem with acid rain.
You work with chemicals,suppose the EPA comes in and adds a huge tax to the chemicals you work with and they have the intent to make them so unaffordable that they cant be used,as they are coal.Also consider that the foreseeable future has no replacement for the chemicals in question.
Do you not think that your industry would not lose jobs? Of course it would.It would also increase the prices of products that use the chemicals that are taxed.
When you take chemicals getting taxed to the point thay that cant be used in an affordable way and then you add the fact that there is no real replacement for these chemicals,there will be job loss.
Loaded??!? Lol.
Your standards may not be as high as mine when it comes to keeping a car's finish. Again, who are you to mandate what is good enough?
I think you need to ask this of yourself.You seem to have a mandate against coal.
I ask you this.Where do you think electricty comes from? The vast majority comes from coal and there is no plausible alternative in the foreseeable future,regardless of what the EPA and others that promote these things might say.
I live in a state that coal is almost the only source of electricty and I have never had a problem with acid rain.
You work with chemicals,suppose the EPA comes in and adds a huge tax to the chemicals you work with and they have the intent to make them so unaffordable that they cant be used,as they are coal.Also consider that the foreseeable future has no replacement for the chemicals in question.
Do you not think that your industry would not lose jobs? Of course it would.It would also increase the prices of products that use the chemicals that are taxed.
When you take chemicals getting taxed to the point thay that cant be used in an affordable way and then you add the fact that there is no real replacement for these chemicals,there will be job loss.