A 66 GTO Goat came with massive 7:74x14 bias ply rubber. An upgrade to F70x14 was the way to go!Tires have come a long way over the years.
A 66 GTO Goat came with massive 7:74x14 bias ply rubber. An upgrade to F70x14 was the way to go!Tires have come a long way over the years.
Man, you are still driving KIA Rio.They're the same car, X3/X4.
Anyway, nice SUV, like I've always said, if I were forced to go back into a gasser, it would be an X3 or X4 M Comp with a tune.
I really don’t know. I don’t pay attention to 0-60. It is impressive result, don’t get me wrong.We need examples of cars in these discussions
If I’m reading your message correctly we agree, it’s the whole package which BMW delivers. (Mentioned in another post to someone above)
I will never do a 0-60 run, but merging and passing happens all the time.I really don’t know. I don’t pay attention to 0-60. It is impressive result, don’t get me wrong.
But, next time you drive it pay attention on 40-80mph acceleration or 60-100mph. That is where the game is.
And the numbers that engine, especially mild-hybrid put are insane in elasticity category. Mild-hybrid wasn’t really put to aid start (it helps) but to aid passing, merging etc. where one needs all power and aids mpg.I will never do a 0-60 run, but merging and passing happens all the time.
Yeah, BMW tends to "understate" their engines' power. My B58 engine is rated at 340hp. Others with the same car have had their cars dyno'd and the results typically show that the engine is really producing close to 380hp, using a 15% driveline loss of power. I've owned 5 bimmers over the years, and every time I walk into the garage to use the car I smile. I've owned the car for 6 years!It’s a mild hybrid right?
BMW does engines very well and they are often better performers than pure numbers would suggest.
However if you think that was insane a GT500 or demon would make your head explode.
Man, you are still driving KIA Rio.
Not really, the B and S 58 seem to be a huge underrate, though, for sure. Best engines BMW has ever made. Even Toyota buys them.Yeah, BMW tends to "understate" their engines' power. My B58 engine is rated at 340hp. Others with the same car have had their cars dyno'd and the results typically show that the engine is really producing close to 380hp, using a 15% driveline loss of power. I've owned 5 bimmers over the years, and every time I walk into the garage to use the car I smile. I've owned the car for 6 years!
You just buy what the magazines tell you then act enlightened.Hey, I can't help always buying best in class.
Rio, Rio! OK, to make you feel better, since your "contribution" is all about that, Sorento.Did you mean to say World Performance Car of 2023?
Maybe not but they would throw you back against the seat.I think you’d be disappointed in the supercar era of the 60s and 70s compared to most any modern car that isn’t an econobox. Nostalgia makes for fond memories but those cars were not very fast.
Cool X3. A coworker just got an X7 M60, it’s sweet and pretty darn quick itself for its size.
It's about passing strict Euro emission standards and avoiding taxes in Europe. It doesn't do a hill of beans for passing. It does help smooth the auto start/stop and with economy around town as well as low speed turbo lag. It does allow the engine to shut off and "glide" from 15-99mph. Basically, it's an economy enhancer and tax avoider.And the numbers that engine, especially mild-hybrid put are insane in elasticity category. Mild-hybrid wasn’t really put to aid start (it helps) but to aid passing, merging etc. where one needs all power and aids mpg.
blah blah blah. We get it, the BMW is quick for an ICE SUV, for sure! It even handles pretty good. Nothing at all wrong with it. Your "contribution" is just conjecture about stuff like the 48V hybrid system that you made up because it sounded good to you.Rio, Rio! OK, to make you feel better, since your "contribution" is all about that, Sorento.
European emissions are same for 2018 and 2022, Euro 6.It's about passing strict Euro emission standards and avoiding taxes in Europe. It doesn't do a hill of beans for passing. It does help smooth the auto start/stop and with economy around town as well as low speed turbo lag. It does allow the engine to shut off and "glide" from 15-99mph. Basically, it's an economy enhancer and tax avoider.
2022 X3 M40i:
Power: 382 hp @ 6500 rpm
Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm
C/D TEST RESULTS
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.1 sec
100 mph: 11.1 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.8 sec @ 107 mph
130 mph: 21.2 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.9 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.5 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.1 sec
2018 X3 M40i:
Power: 355 hp @ 6500 rpm
Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 1520 rpm
C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.4 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 11.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 21.0 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.3 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.8 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.4 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.0 sec @ 107 mph
The differences are right what they should be with the hp delta.
Before you start talking emissions, familiarize yourself with same. And you are still driving Sorento, Euro 6 or not.blah blah blah. We get it, the BMW is quick for an ICE SUV, for sure! It even handles pretty good. Nothing at all wrong with it. Your "contribution" is just conjecture about stuff like the 48V hybrid system that you made up because it sounded good to you.