Don't put words in my mouth. I indicated it was a last resort, because there are lots of people who have gotten significant mileage gains with PEA additives, like 1-3 mpg depending on many factors, of course. Of course I don't expect magic for $15, but it is certainly worth the experiment.60 years of wrenching you said? You are expecting magic in a bottle? There is no additive is going to increase your MPG's to that extent.
correct on both counts. the 3.5/3.7 use the same block, only difference is bore size. and yes, the RWD variants have a proper external pump.I'm just starting to learn about the Duratec line. I don't think the 3.7 is any bigger than the 3.0 I'm thinking the difference is in FWD or RWD. In the latter, plenty of room to hang a water pump.
Your intention insulates it. You should already know that there are infinite variables when it comes to fuel economy. There is no way you can pin point the problem and assume it need additives just to improve you MPG's. Not only that - how many bottles do you need to use just to improve your fuel economy? Will justify the amount of money you put into the additives be cheaper in the long run? How many bottles will be used? I understand it can be used as a maintenance protocol such as other preventative maintenances. And just because it works for other vehicles does not necessarily will work for your vehicle (even if it's the same year, make, model, engine size and etc.. due to variabilities of the circumstances). We do not live in the same area, climate, altitude, etc, etc.. We don't take the same route nor drive the same driving conditions.Don't put words in my mouth. I indicated it was a last resort, because there are lots of people who have gotten significant mileage gains with PEA additives, like 1-3 mpg depending on many factors, of course. Of course I don't expect magic for $15, but it is certainly worth the experiment.
I like your thoughtful, measured response. Heck, I might try it. Will let you and the thread know what happens if I do so.Just to restate my previous post, Ford does not want a check engine light unless absolutely necessary. To that end, the ECU is programmed to compensate to maintain emissions compliance. Lazy O2 sensors and other sensors can contribute to low MPG while not showing up during a scan.
I am not going to insist that's what is wrong. I don't know your vehicle. But please don't be under the impression that since there is no code, everything is optimally functional.
Try my idea of non ethanol fuel and report back.
Product | Bottle Size | Price per Bottle | Cost per Ounce | Estimated PEA % |
Red Line SI-1 | 15 oz | $15.99 (Amazon) | $1.07/oz | ~50% |
15 oz | $11.54 (Walmart) | $0.77/oz | ~50% | |
BG 44K | 11 oz | $23.96 (Walmart) | $2.18/oz | ~40-50% |
11 oz | $24.80 (Amazon) | $2.25/oz | ~40-50% | |
Gumout Regane Complete | 6 oz | $6.34 (Walmart) | $1.06/oz | ~30-50% |
6 oz | $6.34 (Amazon) | $1.06/oz | ~30-50% | |
Techron Concentrate Plus | 32 oz | $21.49 (Amazon) | $0.67/oz | ~20-30% |
20 oz | $14.92 (Amazon) | $0.75/oz | ~20-30% |
Your numbers for percent of PEA is far greater than what any of them claim on the SDS's. And for the sake of simplicity and comparing apples to apples, my pricing was from one source.
Product Bottle Size Price per Bottle Cost per Ounce Estimated PEA %Red Line SI-1
15 oz
$15.99 (Amazon)
$1.07/oz
~50%
15 oz
$11.54 (Walmart)
$0.77/oz
~50%
BG 44K
11 oz
$23.96 (Walmart)
$2.18/oz
~40-50%
11 oz
$24.80 (Amazon)
$2.25/oz
~40-50%
Gumout Regane Complete
6 oz
$6.34 (Walmart)
$1.06/oz
~30-50%
6 oz
$6.34 (Amazon)
$1.06/oz
~30-50%
Techron Concentrate Plus
32 oz
$21.49 (Amazon)
$0.67/oz
~20-30%
20 oz
$14.92 (Amazon)
$0.75/oz
~20-30%
25k miles is really infrequent, almost not worth the bother. Personally I think every 10k would be more like it.Who said anything about a maintenance dose. Just pour it in and forget about it for another 25k miles. Top tier fuel will keep everything clean anyways
Agreed, if those numbers were that high they would surely be published as such in the SDS.Your numbers for percent of PEA is far greater than what any of them claim on the SDS's. And for the sake of simplicity and comparing apples to apples, my pricing was from one source.
Yes, I realize that there is a lot of varying facts for the same product on the various MSDS's and SDS's. As you say, still floating around, nothing dies on the internet. I don't know if you looked at the one for the Techron High Mileage. On the SDS that I saw and used, it had a nice narrow range of 20-25% "Trade secret." That's why I used 22.5% for my OP analysis.You need to be careful where you pull these. There's lots of old versions, old revisions of MSDS floating around the web.
These are directly from the respective manufacturers websites as of today:
Redline: Sl-1 dated Jan-2025:
View attachment 272786
Chevron Techron dated aug 2024:
View attachment 272788
Perhaps I'm overestimating the performance of top tier fuels.25k miles is really infrequent, almost not worth the bother. Personally I think every 10k would be more like it.