Most PEA Bang For Your Buck

60 years of wrenching you said? You are expecting magic in a bottle? There is no additive is going to increase your MPG's to that extent.
Don't put words in my mouth. I indicated it was a last resort, because there are lots of people who have gotten significant mileage gains with PEA additives, like 1-3 mpg depending on many factors, of course. Of course I don't expect magic for $15, but it is certainly worth the experiment.
 
Imho, those injector cleaners are about that, they will dissolve some gum in fuel tank, lines and injectors thus helping with better and less restricted fuel delivery and injection allowing for better ignitability and fuller burn after cleaning. Additive itself will also dilute fuel to potentially reduce gas mileage just a smidge while going thru that tank.
I run Gumout Regane Complete bought in US WM and usually on about 1/2 full tank; and basically just to keep injectors unclogged and spraying as they should.
 
I'm just starting to learn about the Duratec line. I don't think the 3.7 is any bigger than the 3.0 I'm thinking the difference is in FWD or RWD. In the latter, plenty of room to hang a water pump.
correct on both counts. the 3.5/3.7 use the same block, only difference is bore size. and yes, the RWD variants have a proper external pump.
 
Don't put words in my mouth. I indicated it was a last resort, because there are lots of people who have gotten significant mileage gains with PEA additives, like 1-3 mpg depending on many factors, of course. Of course I don't expect magic for $15, but it is certainly worth the experiment.
Your intention insulates it. You should already know that there are infinite variables when it comes to fuel economy. There is no way you can pin point the problem and assume it need additives just to improve you MPG's. Not only that - how many bottles do you need to use just to improve your fuel economy? Will justify the amount of money you put into the additives be cheaper in the long run? How many bottles will be used? I understand it can be used as a maintenance protocol such as other preventative maintenances. And just because it works for other vehicles does not necessarily will work for your vehicle (even if it's the same year, make, model, engine size and etc.. due to variabilities of the circumstances). We do not live in the same area, climate, altitude, etc, etc.. We don't take the same route nor drive the same driving conditions.
 
I use redline every 5K in the Tundra. It sees top tier fuel every time. The Pilot get 2 bottles at 60% and 20% olm. It gets top tier every so often.
 
Just to restate my previous post, Ford does not want a check engine light unless absolutely necessary. To that end, the ECU is programmed to compensate to maintain emissions compliance. Lazy O2 sensors and other sensors can contribute to low MPG while not showing up during a scan.

I am not going to insist that's what is wrong. I don't know your vehicle. But please don't be under the impression that since there is no code, everything is optimally functional.

Try my idea of non ethanol fuel and report back.
 
Just to restate my previous post, Ford does not want a check engine light unless absolutely necessary. To that end, the ECU is programmed to compensate to maintain emissions compliance. Lazy O2 sensors and other sensors can contribute to low MPG while not showing up during a scan.

I am not going to insist that's what is wrong. I don't know your vehicle. But please don't be under the impression that since there is no code, everything is optimally functional.

Try my idea of non ethanol fuel and report back.
I like your thoughtful, measured response. Heck, I might try it. Will let you and the thread know what happens if I do so.
 
To the OP, if the drive train is up to spec, turn your attention to the wheel bearings, brakes, Tires and tire pressure, and Alignment (as another poster mentioned). Also record your own observed mileage and compare to the Lincoln's built in calculations. With two of my vehicles (both Nissans) one is almost dead on, the other is off by up 4 mpg at times. With all this said....and every other comment, something is seriously out of wack to be down 16+ MPG.
 

Product
Bottle Size
Price per Bottle
Cost per Ounce
Estimated PEA %
Red Line SI-1
15 oz

$15.99 (Amazon)

$1.07/oz

~50%


15 oz

$11.54 (Walmart)

$0.77/oz

~50%

BG 44K

11 oz

$23.96 (Walmart)

$2.18/oz

~40-50%


11 oz

$24.80 (Amazon)

$2.25/oz

~40-50%

Gumout Regane Complete

6 oz

$6.34 (Walmart)

$1.06/oz

~30-50%


6 oz

$6.34 (Amazon)

$1.06/oz

~30-50%

Techron Concentrate Plus

32 oz

$21.49 (Amazon)

$0.67/oz

~20-30%


20 oz

$14.92 (Amazon)

$0.75/oz

~20-30%
 

Product
Bottle Size
Price per Bottle
Cost per Ounce
Estimated PEA %
Red Line SI-1
15 oz

$15.99 (Amazon)

$1.07/oz

~50%

15 oz

$11.54 (Walmart)

$0.77/oz

~50%

BG 44K

11 oz

$23.96 (Walmart)

$2.18/oz

~40-50%

11 oz

$24.80 (Amazon)

$2.25/oz

~40-50%

Gumout Regane Complete

6 oz

$6.34 (Walmart)

$1.06/oz

~30-50%

6 oz

$6.34 (Amazon)

$1.06/oz

~30-50%

Techron Concentrate Plus

32 oz

$21.49 (Amazon)

$0.67/oz

~20-30%

20 oz

$14.92 (Amazon)

$0.75/oz

~20-30%
Your numbers for percent of PEA is far greater than what any of them claim on the SDS's. And for the sake of simplicity and comparing apples to apples, my pricing was from one source.
 
On Amazon now.

BG 44K Fuel System Cleaner Power Enhancer 2 Pack 11oz can​

Lowest price in 30 days
$26.98 with 45 percent savings -45% $26.98

From: camelcamelcamel
 
Last edited:
Who said anything about a maintenance dose. Just pour it in and forget about it for another 25k miles. Top tier fuel will keep everything clean anyways
25k miles is really infrequent, almost not worth the bother. Personally I think every 10k would be more like it.
 
Your numbers for percent of PEA is far greater than what any of them claim on the SDS's. And for the sake of simplicity and comparing apples to apples, my pricing was from one source.
Agreed, if those numbers were that high they would surely be published as such in the SDS.
Very optimistic for sure
 
Redline 30-50%

1744235547635.webp




Techron 5-10%

1744235651793.webp




Regane 10-30%

1744235784747.webp




BG 44K ???

1744235966283.webp
 
You need to be careful where you pull these. There's lots of old versions, old revisions of MSDS floating around the web.
These are directly from the respective manufacturers websites as of today:

Redline: Sl-1 dated Jan-2025:
1744291221911.webp


Chevron Techron dated aug 2024:
1744291296145.webp
 
You need to be careful where you pull these. There's lots of old versions, old revisions of MSDS floating around the web.
These are directly from the respective manufacturers websites as of today:

Redline: Sl-1 dated Jan-2025:
View attachment 272786

Chevron Techron dated aug 2024:
View attachment 272788
Yes, I realize that there is a lot of varying facts for the same product on the various MSDS's and SDS's. As you say, still floating around, nothing dies on the internet. I don't know if you looked at the one for the Techron High Mileage. On the SDS that I saw and used, it had a nice narrow range of 20-25% "Trade secret." That's why I used 22.5% for my OP analysis.

Coincidentally with all this, the local Advance has a BOGO on the Techron products, $12.99 for two, so I bought six.
 
Back
Top Bottom