I will, but they'll have to pay for my overtime! 1.5xYou should submit your findings to SAE and STLE.
I also worked on some holidays and that's 2.5x $
I will, but they'll have to pay for my overtime! 1.5xYou should submit your findings to SAE and STLE.
Until then, silence.I will, but they'll have to pay for my overtime! 1.5x
I also worked on some holidays and that's 2.5x $
I’ve run two 10k mile intervals in my mustang with Mobil 1, one with Valvoline and one with Castrol. Yeah Valvoline uses a lot of moly in their blend, Castrol uses titanium, guess which one did better? I can’t answer that because the wear metals aren’t significantly different. They’ve all held up and they’ve all ran fine.OP here : For sake of arguement what I should have focused on is that Mobil 1 UOA’s or VOA’s can be deceiving just by looking at numbers alone (i.e. especially Moly if you don’t know the type of Moly used ?) Other additives may show low (or may not show up in a UOA or VOA at all) causing one to wrongly assume M1 oils compared to other brand oils make M1 oils not look so good …. The higher additive numbers must be better” hypothesis ?
Until then, silence.
I agree Shel. Tens of millions of gallons over Pennzoil, Castrol, Valvoline etc? Might be a stretch.
Say you have a DI engine , the M1 0W30 ESP has a VI of 180 . Do you have any concerns regarding VII’s and possible IVD’s with that higher VI 180 number over a typical 5K mile OCI ?I’ve run two 10k mile intervals in my mustang with Mobil 1, one with Valvoline and one with Castrol. Yeah Valvoline uses a lot of moly in their blend, Castrol uses titanium, guess which one did better? I can’t answer that because the wear metals aren’t significantly different. They’ve all held up and they’ve all ran fine.
Plasma spectroscopy destroys all the chemistry of whatever additive molecules were the oil. Yes it gives you an idea what’s in the oil but it’s like asking what cut of steak is for dinner and the only answer you get back is beef. That’s nice but the details of what kind of beef matter.
It can’t tell if I’ve added more ZDDP or if I’ve pointlessly sprinkled in some powdered zinc and phosphorus. It also can’t tell if that zinc and phosphorus were still bound in a useful ZDDP molecule or if they’ve been used up and are just floating around as spent additive.
People adding up ppm of elements and declaring one oil better than another “because it has more” is just about the dumbest thing you could do and yet you see these types of reviews all over the place.
Mobil 1 0w-30 ESP has become a goto when changing oil for friends and family. Readily available, not expensive, lower saps, low pour point, GTL/PAO/Grp3 blend. Plus they’re usually running a rebate or promotion.
Oh no I have Mobil 1 in the wife's lawn mower now. Better run out and change it.Here’s an example. This was just posted 3 hours ago on a Facebook post on a high mileage Toyota page regarding high mileage motor oils.
Supertech outperforms Mobile 1 garbage by far in all testing. Mobile 1 is way at the bottom of all testing against all big name oils. Amsoil of course lands on top I. Legitimate testing over all other oils as it's 1 of only 2 legitimate actual true synthetic oils. I would not put Mobile 1 in a lawnmower let alone my car.
Low saps oil and a catch can, mostly the catch can, keep valve deposit worries away.Say you have a DI engine , the M1 0W30 ESP has a VI of 180 . Do you have any concerns regarding VII’s and possible IVD’s with that higher VI 180 number over a typical 5K mile OCI ?
Don’t worry you’re safe, this guy was referring to Mobile 1…which is way at the bottom of testing.Oh no I have Mobil 1 in the wife's lawn mower now. Better run out and change it.
Your wife mows the lawn? Does she have a sister?Oh no I have Mobil 1 in the wife's lawn mower now. Better run out and change it.