Originally Posted By: brianm_14
As a former chemistry professor (I am now in Life Sciences) and experienced researcher, I of course love to see quantitative data that rests on good stats. But there is a lot in the world which resists such analysis, due to inherent difficulties or lack of money. Many scientists avoid addressing a number of interesting and meaningful questions simply because they cannot figure out how to get at the problem in the standard fashion, with all the statistical trimmings. Too bad for all of all!
In science, and especially medicine, we often need to address problems with only a limited database. Not the ideal, not my preference, but sometimes anecdotal evidence is what we have to go on. This is where artfulness comes in. Use your judgment. This applies to MSDS. Deal with them all the time, remember when they were hard to obtain. The composition of MMO suggests to me that one avoid skin contact or ingestion. As for it harming aluminum, the MSDS is not fine-tuned to help us judge at what concentration, and length of exposure, this would be of concern in an engine. I suspect Al engine parts are exposed to greater challenges!
I use MMO on a limited basis. Don't go around chronically worrying about it, or I wouldn't use it. If you need to use products which meet certain evidential standards, you are going to live in a quite circumscribed world. Long use in pharmacy has led to many components and products being termed GRAS -Generally Recognized As Safe. This acknowledges that accumulated anecdotal evidence is not without value.
Your mileage may -indeed will- vary, so to each his own. But by all means, let us share our "anecdotes".
I largely agree with you.
I use approved medicines on a limited basis. If I needed to use them more often, I would investigate / see a doctor.
I also rely on those that have performed testing and given approvals eg USP for medicines
As a former chemistry professor (I am now in Life Sciences) and experienced researcher, I of course love to see quantitative data that rests on good stats. But there is a lot in the world which resists such analysis, due to inherent difficulties or lack of money. Many scientists avoid addressing a number of interesting and meaningful questions simply because they cannot figure out how to get at the problem in the standard fashion, with all the statistical trimmings. Too bad for all of all!
In science, and especially medicine, we often need to address problems with only a limited database. Not the ideal, not my preference, but sometimes anecdotal evidence is what we have to go on. This is where artfulness comes in. Use your judgment. This applies to MSDS. Deal with them all the time, remember when they were hard to obtain. The composition of MMO suggests to me that one avoid skin contact or ingestion. As for it harming aluminum, the MSDS is not fine-tuned to help us judge at what concentration, and length of exposure, this would be of concern in an engine. I suspect Al engine parts are exposed to greater challenges!
I use MMO on a limited basis. Don't go around chronically worrying about it, or I wouldn't use it. If you need to use products which meet certain evidential standards, you are going to live in a quite circumscribed world. Long use in pharmacy has led to many components and products being termed GRAS -Generally Recognized As Safe. This acknowledges that accumulated anecdotal evidence is not without value.
Your mileage may -indeed will- vary, so to each his own. But by all means, let us share our "anecdotes".
I largely agree with you.
I use approved medicines on a limited basis. If I needed to use them more often, I would investigate / see a doctor.
I also rely on those that have performed testing and given approvals eg USP for medicines