Originally Posted By: ThirdeYe
Originally Posted By: Pablo
No they legally can't. They can only, if the lack of changing every 4 months causes some related damage. I'm not saying they wouldn't put up a stupid non-customer friendly fight, but what you say is just not true and it's repeated here on BITOG.
Say the OP changes every 6 months and his suspension explodes or a camshaft snaps in two because of some exceedingly rare metallurgical flaw, Mazda cannot just "deny warranty coverage".
I believe Pablo is right about this. I've always heard that the dealer/manufacturer has to prove that your lack of oil changes is what actually caused the damage in order to void your warranty.
The law that prevents them from voiding a warranty because of a perceived maintenance lapse is called the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act of 1975. ThirdeYe and Pablo are correct, the dealer must prove the issue was caused by a lack of maintenance.
Originally Posted By: Pablo
No they legally can't. They can only, if the lack of changing every 4 months causes some related damage. I'm not saying they wouldn't put up a stupid non-customer friendly fight, but what you say is just not true and it's repeated here on BITOG.
Say the OP changes every 6 months and his suspension explodes or a camshaft snaps in two because of some exceedingly rare metallurgical flaw, Mazda cannot just "deny warranty coverage".
I believe Pablo is right about this. I've always heard that the dealer/manufacturer has to prove that your lack of oil changes is what actually caused the damage in order to void your warranty.
The law that prevents them from voiding a warranty because of a perceived maintenance lapse is called the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act of 1975. ThirdeYe and Pablo are correct, the dealer must prove the issue was caused by a lack of maintenance.